M Rickard1, L H Braga2, J-P Oliveria3, R Romao4, J Demaria5, A J Lorenzo6. 1. McMaster Children's Hospital, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada. 2. McMaster Children's Hospital, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada; McMaster University, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada; McMaster Pediatric Surgery Research Collaborative, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada. Electronic address: braga@mcmaster.ca. 3. McMaster University, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada. 4. Dalhousie University, 6299 South Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada. 5. McMaster Children's Hospital, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada; McMaster University, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada. 6. The Hospital for Sick Children, Division of Urology, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Renograms are frequently obtained post-pyeloplasty in patients with residual hydronephrosis to confirm adequate drainage. Recent evidence suggests that percent improvement in antero-posterior diameter (PI-APD) ≥38 is predictive of success. We sought to further explore PI-APD ranges that would allow identification of patients who would benefit from ultrasound (US) monitoring alone vs. post-operative renal scan, and those more likely to develop recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (rUPJO). METHODS: A single-center prospectively-collected pyeloplasty database (2008-2015) was queried (n = 151). Only patients with both pre- and post-operative APD measurements were included (n = 138). PI-APD was divided into 3 categories: <20%; 20-39%; ≥40%. The following variables were collected post-operatively: patients monitored with US alone, renogram and US, rUPJO and minimal or resolved hydronephrosis (SFU ≤2; UTD ≤1; APD ≤15 mm). RESULTS: Mean age at first and last follow-up were 4.8 (median 4.0; range 0-60) months and 26.6 (median 20.5; range 1-77) months, respectively. Of 138 patients, 84 (61%) had US alone, 54 (39%) had a renogram and US post-operatively, and 6 (4%) developed rUPJO. Of 84 patients who had US alone, 71 (84%; p < 0.01) demonstrated ≥40% PI-APD. Of 54 patients with renogram and US 46 (85%; p < 0.01) had ≥40 PI-APD. Of the 6 patients who developed rUPJO, all were in the <20 PI-APD group (100%; p < 0.01). Resolution of hydronephrosis according to SFU, UTD and APD occurred in 96/138 (70%), 89/138 (64%) and 113/138 (82%) patients respectively. Of these, 87 (91%), 81 (91%), and 108 (95%) occurred in >40% PI-APD group. CONCLUSION: ≥40% PI-APD at the first post-operative visit strongly predicts pyeloplasty success, as up to 82% of these patients showed resolved hydronephrosis and 61% underwent non-invasive monitoring by US alone. Our data suggests that up to 85% of renograms may have been unnecessary. Finally, <20% PI-APD permitted identification of all rUPJO cases. Stratification of patients based in PI-APD is a promising strategy for further minimizing radiation exposure while safely detecting children at risk for rUPJO.
INTRODUCTION: Renograms are frequently obtained post-pyeloplasty in patients with residual hydronephrosis to confirm adequate drainage. Recent evidence suggests that percent improvement in antero-posterior diameter (PI-APD) ≥38 is predictive of success. We sought to further explore PI-APD ranges that would allow identification of patients who would benefit from ultrasound (US) monitoring alone vs. post-operative renal scan, and those more likely to develop recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (rUPJO). METHODS: A single-center prospectively-collected pyeloplasty database (2008-2015) was queried (n = 151). Only patients with both pre- and post-operative APD measurements were included (n = 138). PI-APD was divided into 3 categories: <20%; 20-39%; ≥40%. The following variables were collected post-operatively: patients monitored with US alone, renogram and US, rUPJO and minimal or resolved hydronephrosis (SFU ≤2; UTD ≤1; APD ≤15 mm). RESULTS: Mean age at first and last follow-up were 4.8 (median 4.0; range 0-60) months and 26.6 (median 20.5; range 1-77) months, respectively. Of 138 patients, 84 (61%) had US alone, 54 (39%) had a renogram and US post-operatively, and 6 (4%) developed rUPJO. Of 84 patients who had US alone, 71 (84%; p < 0.01) demonstrated ≥40% PI-APD. Of 54 patients with renogram and US 46 (85%; p < 0.01) had ≥40 PI-APD. Of the 6 patients who developed rUPJO, all were in the <20 PI-APD group (100%; p < 0.01). Resolution of hydronephrosis according to SFU, UTD and APD occurred in 96/138 (70%), 89/138 (64%) and 113/138 (82%) patients respectively. Of these, 87 (91%), 81 (91%), and 108 (95%) occurred in >40% PI-APD group. CONCLUSION: ≥40% PI-APD at the first post-operative visit strongly predicts pyeloplasty success, as up to 82% of these patients showed resolved hydronephrosis and 61% underwent non-invasive monitoring by US alone. Our data suggests that up to 85% of renograms may have been unnecessary. Finally, <20% PI-APD permitted identification of all rUPJO cases. Stratification of patients based in PI-APD is a promising strategy for further minimizing radiation exposure while safely detecting children at risk for rUPJO.
Authors: Javier Ordóñez; Rubén Ortiz; Alberto Parente; Laura Burgos; Beatriz Fernández-Bautista; Laura Pérez-Egido; José María Angulo Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 3.569