Tony Shu Kam Mok1, Sarayut Lucien Geater2, Wu-Chou Su3, Eng-Huat Tan4, James Chi-Hsin Yang5, Gee-Chen Chang6, May Han7, Philip Komarnitsky7, Francis Payumo7, Jennifer E Garrus8, Sandra Close8, Keunchil Park9. 1. State Key Laboratory of South China, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Republic of China. Electronic address: tony@clo.cuhk.edu.hk. 2. Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand. 3. National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan City, Republic of China. 4. National Cancer Centre, Singapore. 5. National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Republic of China. 6. Division of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Republic of China. 7. AVEO Oncology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 8. Biodesix, Inc., Boulder, Colorado. 9. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A randomized phase 2 study was designed to compare the combination of ficlatuzumab (AV-299), a humanized hepatocyte growth factor-neutralizing monoclonal antibody, plus gefitinib versus gefitinib monotherapy in a pulmonary adenocarcinoma population clinically enriched for EFGR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitizing mutations. METHODS:A total of 188 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either gefitinib or ficlatuzumab plus gefitinib treatment. Patients who demonstrated disease control in the single-agent gefitinib arm were allowed to cross over to ficlatuzumab plus gefitinib treatment upon disease progression. Molecular analyses included tumor EGFR mutation status and retrospective proteomic testing using VeriStrat, a multivariate test based on mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The addition of ficlatuzumab to gefitinib did not provide significant improvement over gefitinib monotherapy for the primary end point of overall response rate or the secondary end points of progression-free survival and overall survival. In the subgroup classified as VeriStrat poor, the addition of ficlatuzumab to gefitinib showed significant improvement in both progression-free survival and overall survival in both the intent-to-treat population and the subgroup with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitizing mutations. For all patients, the most frequent adverse events were diarrhea, dermatitis acneiform, and paronychia. CONCLUSIONS: Although the trial showed no significant benefit from the addition of ficlatuzumab to gefitinib in the overall population of Asian patients with advanced-stage pulmonary adenocarcinoma, the biomarker data suggest that patients classified as VeriStrat poor may benefit from ficlatuzumab combination therapy.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: A randomized phase 2 study was designed to compare the combination of ficlatuzumab (AV-299), a humanized hepatocyte growth factor-neutralizing monoclonal antibody, plus gefitinib versus gefitinib monotherapy in a pulmonary adenocarcinoma population clinically enriched for EFGR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitizing mutations. METHODS: A total of 188 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either gefitinib or ficlatuzumab plus gefitinib treatment. Patients who demonstrated disease control in the single-agent gefitinib arm were allowed to cross over to ficlatuzumab plus gefitinib treatment upon disease progression. Molecular analyses included tumorEGFR mutation status and retrospective proteomic testing using VeriStrat, a multivariate test based on mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The addition of ficlatuzumab to gefitinib did not provide significant improvement over gefitinib monotherapy for the primary end point of overall response rate or the secondary end points of progression-free survival and overall survival. In the subgroup classified as VeriStrat poor, the addition of ficlatuzumab to gefitinib showed significant improvement in both progression-free survival and overall survival in both the intent-to-treat population and the subgroup with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitizing mutations. For all patients, the most frequent adverse events were diarrhea, dermatitis acneiform, and paronychia. CONCLUSIONS: Although the trial showed no significant benefit from the addition of ficlatuzumab to gefitinib in the overall population of Asian patients with advanced-stage pulmonary adenocarcinoma, the biomarker data suggest that patients classified as VeriStrat poor may benefit from ficlatuzumab combination therapy.
Authors: Consuelo Buttigliero; Frances A Shepherd; Fabrice Barlesi; Brian Schwartz; Sergey Orlov; Adolfo G Favaretto; Armando Santoro; Vera Hirsh; Rodryg Ramlau; Adele R Blackler; Joanna Roder; David Spigel; Silvia Novello; Wallace Akerley; Giorgio V Scagliotti Journal: Oncologist Date: 2018-08-23
Authors: Aflah Roohullah; Adam Cooper; Anna J Lomax; Jennifer Aung; Alan Barge; Lilian Chow; Mark McHale; Jayesh Desai; James R Whittle; Ben Tran; Paul de Souza; Lisa G Horvath Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Saiama N Waqar; Mary W Redman; Susanne M Arnold; Fred R Hirsch; Philip C Mack; Lawrence H Schwartz; David R Gandara; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Natasha B Leighl; Suresh S Ramalingam; Saloni H Tanna; Ryan S Raddin; Katherine Minichiello; Jeffrey D Bradley; Karen Kelly; Roy S Herbst; Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2020-10-14 Impact factor: 4.785