Literature DB >> 27448746

Ensuring a negligible risk of Trichinella in pig farming from a control perspective.

Lis Alban1, Jesper Valentin Petersen2.   

Abstract

Today, the majority of pigs are raised in industrialised pig production systems with a high level of biosecurity resulting in a negligible risk of Trichinella. Carcass testing therefore seems less relevant if the aim of testing is to protect public health. However, traditional pig production (including backyard production) still occurs, and organic pig production is on the increase in some areas, suggesting a continued need for carcass testing from such compartments. These diverse developments within pig production have changed the epidemiologic situation of Trichinella. This has necessitated an adaption of the legislation regarding Trichinella surveillance and control, in order to ensure and document public health while also allowing trade of livestock and meat without unnecessary restrictions. This is reflected in the recent development of the international legislation regarding Trichinella and associated control obligations for trade in pork as described in the EU legislation and by OIE/FAO/Codex. A common element in the adapted legislation, standards and guidelines is that if a high level of biosecurity can be demonstrated on a pig farm, then the farm belongs to the negligible-risk compartment and there is no need for carcass testing. Maintaining a negligible-risk compartment involves compliance checks for biosecurity requirements, for example through regular audit visits to the farms. Private standards can be used as means of third-party audit of the biosecurity status. Other (or additional) approaches to maintaining the negligible-risk compartment that do not involving a visit to the farm include slaughter surveillance. For farms that do not belong to a negligible-risk compartment an auditing of biosecurity does not make sense in the traditional way. For these farms, all pigs should be tested for Trichinella in order to ensure food safety and to undertake early-warning surveillance of a potentially high-risk sub-population. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditing; Biosecurity; Guidelines; Trichinella

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27448746     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Alternative Meat Inspection Regimes for Pigs From Non-Controlled Housing - Considering the Cost of Error.

Authors:  Rikke Koch Hansen; Lisbeth Harm Nielsen; Mahmoud El Tholth; Barbara Haesler; Alessandro Foddai; Lis Alban
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-06-05

2.  Validation of the Magnetic Stirrer Method for the Detection of Trichinella Larvae in Muscle Samples Based on Proficiency Tests Results.

Authors:  Mirosław Różycki; Weronika Korpysa-Dzirba; Aneta Bełcik; Ewa Bilska-Zając; Maciej Kochanowski; Jacek Karamon; Jacek Sroka; Tomasz Cencek
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-02-11

3.  Trichinella spp. control in modern pork production systems.

Authors:  H Ray Gamble
Journal:  Food Waterborne Parasitol       Date:  2022-07-30

4.  Validation of a new commercial serine protease artificial digestion assay for the detection of Trichinella larvae in pork.

Authors:  Alvin Gajadhar; Kelly Konecsni; Brad Scandrett; Patrik Buholzer
Journal:  Food Waterborne Parasitol       Date:  2018-04-09

5.  Assessing the risk of human trichinellosis from pigs kept under controlled and non-controlled housing in Europe.

Authors:  Frits Franssen; Katsuhisa Takumi; Joke van der Giessen; Arno Swart
Journal:  Food Waterborne Parasitol       Date:  2018-04-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.