| Literature DB >> 27447461 |
Krzysztof Mikołajczak1, Anetta Kuczyńska2, Paweł Krajewski1, Aneta Sawikowska1, Maria Surma1, Piotr Ogrodowicz1, Tadeusz Adamski1, Karolina Krystkowiak1, Andrzej G Górny1, Michał Kempa1, Iwona Szarejko3, Justyna Guzy-Wróbelska3, Kornelia Gudyś3.
Abstract
High-yielding capacity of the modern barley varieties is mostly dependent on the sources of semi-dwarfness associated with the sdw1/denso locus. The objective of the study was to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with the plant height and yield potential of barley recombinant inbred lines (RILs) grown under various soil moisture regimes. The plant material was developed from a hybrid between the Maresi (European cv.) and CamB (Syrian cv.). A total of 103 QTLs affecting analysed traits were detected and 36 of them showed stable effects over environments. In total, ten QTLs were found to be significant only under water shortage conditions. Nine QTLs affecting the length of main stem were detected on 2H-6H chromosomes. In four of the detected QTLs, alleles contributed by Maresi had negative effects on that trait, the most significant being the QLSt-3H.1-1 in the 3H.1 linkage group. The close linkage between QTLs identified around the sdw1/denso locus, with positive alleles contributed by Maresi, indicates that the semi-dwarf cv. Maresi could serve as a donor of favourable traits resulting in grain yield improvement, also under water scarcity. Molecular analyses revealed that the Syrian cv. also contributed alleles which increased the yield potential. Available barley resources of genomic annotations were employed to the biological interpretation of detected QTLs. This approach revealed 26 over-represented Gene Ontology terms. In the projected support intervals of QGWSl-5H.3-2 and QLSt-5H.3 on the chromosome 5H, four genes annotated to 'response to stress' were found. It suggests that these QTL-regions may be involved in a response of plant to a wide range of environmental disturbances.Entities:
Keywords: Drought; Functional annotation; Phenotyping; QTLs; Spring barley; sdw1/denso gene
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27447461 PMCID: PMC5243891 DOI: 10.1007/s13353-016-0358-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Genet ISSN: 1234-1983 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig. 1Water retention curve pF
Variance components and standard errors (s.e.) estimated for phenotypic traits observed in barley RIL population, broad-sense heritabilitiesies heritability (h2 bs) calculated across different treatments
| Trait | Variance component, standard error (s.e.) | Broad sense heritability (h2 bs) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIL | s.e. | RIL × year | s.e. | RIL × treatment | s.e. | RIL × year × treatment | s.e. | T-I | T-II | C | |
| LSt | 31.73* | 5.34 | 8.51* | 1.60 | 2.05 | 0.97 | 6.41* | 1.34 | 83.58 | 72.44 | 84.84 |
| NPT | 0.13* | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.08* | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 40.73 | 58.49 | 83.53 |
| LSm | 0.737* | 0.115 | 0.106* | 0.016 | 0.062* | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 90.96 | 94.01 | 91.69 |
| NGSm | 6.96* | 1.06 | 0.49* | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.43 | 0.15 | 89.86 | 81.98 | 95.01 |
| GWSm | 0.013* | 0.002 | 0.002* | 0.000 | 0.001* | 0.000 | 0.002* | 0.000 | 88.06 | 92.29 | 88.84 |
| LSl | 0.533* | 0.083 | 0.093* | 0.015 | 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.022 | 0.012 | 90.73 | - | 87.99 |
| NGSl | 3.84* | 0.64 | 0.84* | 0.17 | 0.46* | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 81.97 | 64.00 | 90.89 |
| GWSl | 0.005* | 0.001 | 0.002* | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.002* | 0.000 | 54.94 | 58.45 | 82.04 |
| TGW | 5.59* | 1.17 | 4.81* | 0.79 | −0.24 | 0.37 | 2.57* | 0.64 | 48.92 | 43.81 | 59.59 |
| GWP | 0.032* | 0.008 | 0.037* | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.004 | 0.008 | 0.005 | 36.06 | 76.19 | 54.98 |
| HD | 18.19* | 2.86 | 3.39* | 0.43 | 1.41* | 0.25 | 1.55* | 0.18 | 88.41 | 92.68 | 94.11 |
*statistical significance of variance components was defined by comparing their values with standard error (component was significant if its value was greater than three times of standard error value); missing data of h2 bs – negative value of heritability
Pearson correlation coefficients between length of the main stem and other phenotypic traits in the barley RIL population under different environments; significance at P < 0.001
| Trait | Length of main stem (LSt) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T-I_11 | C_11 | T-II_12 | C_12 | T-I_13 | T-II_13 | C_13 | |
| NPT | n.s. | n.s. | −0.35 | −0.51 | −0.54 | n.s. | −0.50 |
| LSm | 0.31 | n.s. | 0.23 | 0.32 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.54 |
| NGSm | 0.47 | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | 0.50 | 0.59 | 0.34 |
| GWSm | 0.60 | 0.39 | n.s. | n.s. | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.44 |
| LSl | 0.31 | n.s. | n.s. | 0.28 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.40 |
| NGSl | 0.49 | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | 0.24 | 0.24 | n.s. |
| GWSl | 0.58 | 0.42 | n.s. | n.s. | 0.32 | 0.30 | n.s. |
| TGW | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.35 | n.s. | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.26 |
| GWP | 0.49 | 0.36 | n.s. | −0.29 | n.s. | 0.36 | n.s. |
| HD | n.s. | −0.43 | −0.24 | n.s. | 0.33 | 0.43 | n.s. |
n.s. – not significant
Fig. 2The co-localization of the QTLs for the length of main stem (bolded) and other traits (±5 cM); names of the closest linked markers and QTL symbol on the right side and their position in cM – left side; no QTLs for LSt were detected on 1H and 7H chromosomes; diagram was designed on the base of the genetic linkage map constructed by Mikołajczak et al. (2016)
GO biological process terms over-represented in the annotation of genes occurring in the regions of QTLs
| GO biological process term | QTL symbol | Total number of genes in the QTL region | Number of genes annotated with the term | List of genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| carbohydrate metabolic process | QGWSl-4H | 7 | 1 | MLOC_69905 |
| defense response | QLSm-3H.1-1 | 82 | 2 | MLOC_3038, MLOC_50823 |
| QLSt-6H-2 | 41 | 2 | MLOC_38183, MLOC_76360 | |
| QNGSm-7H.2 | 102 | 5 | MLOC_52432, MLOC_14659, MLOC_6883, MLOC_31061, MLOC_62757 | |
| QNPT-5H.1 | 36 | 1 | MLOC_67608 | |
| fatty acid biosynthetic process | QGWP-4H | 7 | 1 | MLOC_79574 |
| QLSm-4H-1 | 35 | 2 | MLOC_55029, MLOC_54031 | |
| lipid metabolic process | QLSl-7H.2 | 146 | 5 | MLOC_58861, MLOC_57679, MLOC_81843, MLOC_65304, MLOC_4594 |
| QNPT-6H-1 | 103 | 2 | MLOC_35847, MLOC_19178 | |
| lipid transport | QLSm-2H-3 | 150 | 3 | MLOC_14732, MLOC_9887, MLOC_59422 |
| metabolic process | QLSt-2H | 47 | 4 | MLOC_44360, MLOC_12202, MLOC_51066, MLOC_25950 |
| multicellular organismal development | QNGSm-3H.1-1 | 161 | 6 | MLOC_37082, MLOC_63238, MLOC_71688, MLOC_50033, MLOC_56271, MLOC_81554 |
| QNPT-3H.1-1 | 77 | 4 | MLOC_68550, MLOC_68553, MLOC_64722, MLOC_3103 | |
| negative regulation of catalytic activity | QLSl-3H.1-2 | 82 | 3 | MLOC_72017, MLOC_52861, MLOC_16041 |
| obsolete ATP catabolic process | QLSl-7H.2 | 146 | 5 | MLOC_2098, MLOC_76366, MLOC_12388, MLOC_44081, MLOC_9846 |
| phosphorylation | QHD-4H | 100 | 6 | MLOC_2842, MLOC_37279, MLOC_10839, MLOC_61764, MLOC_58063, MLOC_53722 |
| QLSl-3H.1-1 | 10 | 2 | MLOC_55753, MLOC_55752 | |
| protein ubiquitination | QLSl-2H-3 | 228 | 9 | MLOC_40031, MLOC_54978, MLOC_679, MLOC_60024, MLOC_8581, MLOC_81408, MLOC_63051, MLOC_39480, MLOC_63511 |
| regulation of signal transduction | QLSl-3H.1-1 | 10 | 4 | MLOC_55753, MLOC_55752, MLOC_36868, MLOC_36867 |
| response to auxin | QGWP-5H.3 | 159 | 5 | MLOC_58506, MLOC_58508, MLOC_58507, MLOC_65368, MLOC_65978 |
| QLSl-2H-3 | 228 | 7 | MLOC_62887, MLOC_8923, MLOC_61988, MLOC_22418, MLOC_14016, MLOC_5261, MLOC_55346 | |
| response to freezing | QNPT-2H-1 | 42 | 1 | MLOC_50785 |
| response to stress | QGWSl-5H.3-2 | 159 | 3 | MLOC_51191 (HsfA2a), MLOC_59425, MLOC_14293 |
| QLSt-5H.3 | 54 | 1 | MLOC_59425 | |
| ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process | QNGSm-3H.1-1 | 161 | 6 | MLOC_37082, MLOC_63238, MLOC_71688, MLOC_50033, MLOC_56271, MLOC_81554 |
| QNPT-3H.1-1 | 77 | 4 | MLOC_68550, MLOC_68553, MLOC_64722, MLOC_3103 |