Literature DB >> 27447341

JOURNAL CLUB: Value of Quantitative FDG PET/CT Volumetric Biomarkers in Recurrent Colorectal Cancer Patient Survival.

Charles Marcus1, Rick Wray1, Mehdi Taghipour1, Wael Marashdeh1, Se Jin Ahn1, Esther Mena1, Rathan M Subramaniam1,2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of quantitative PET parameters in the overall survival of patients with recurrent colorectal cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 105 patients with a biopsy-proven recurrence of colorectal cancer who underwent PET/CT were included in the study. A gradient segmentation method was used to calculate maximum and peak standardized uptake values (SUVmax, SUVpeak), total lesion glycolysis (TLGtotal), and metabolic tumor volume (MTVtotal). These parameters were measured for each recurrent lesion at the primary, locoregional, and distant sites. The median follow-up time was 31.3 months. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome and was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival plots and Cox regression analyses.
RESULTS: The mean ± SD for SUVmax, SUVpeak, TLGtotal, and MTVtotal of the included patients was 7.3 ± 5.3, 5.3 ± 3.3, 280.8 ± 1181 g, and 79.8 ± 294 mL, respectively. The median OS for patients who were alive was 50 months in comparison with 23.4 months among patients who died. Age (p = 0.041), tumor grade (p = 0.010), median TLG (p = 0.031), and median MTV (p = 0.009) remained significantly associated with OS in the multivariate Cox regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis performed on the basis of the median PET/CT parametric values showed that SUVmax (threshold, 5.63; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.7; 95% CI, 1-2.8; p = 0.02), MTVtotal (threshold, 13.85 mL; HR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.9; p = 0.003), and TLGtotal (threshold, 36.14 g; HR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.3; p = 0.01) were significant predictors of OS during follow-up. An integrated risk stratification model with SUVmax and MTVtotal into three subgroups predicted patient survival outcomes (HR = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.25-2.65; log-rank p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: SUVmax, MTVtotal, TLGtotal, and integrated score with FDG avidity and total tumor burden provide survival information for patients with biopsy-proven recurrent colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET/CT; colorectal cancer; follow-up; metabolic tumor volume; overall survival; recurrence; standardized uptake value; total lesion glycolysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27447341     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.15.15806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  8 in total

1.  Metabolic tumor burden quantified on [18F]FDG PET/CT improves TNM staging of lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Paula Lapa; Bárbara Oliveiros; Margarida Marques; Jorge Isidoro; Filipe Caseiro Alves; J M Nascimento Costa; Gracinda Costa; João Pedroso de Lima
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Clinical Indications and Impact on Management: Fourth and Subsequent Posttherapy Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans in Oncology Patients.

Authors:  Mehdi Taghipour; Charles Marcus; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Esther Mena; Shwetha Prasad; Abhinav K Jha; Lilja Solnes; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Lymph Nodes Evaluation in Rectal Cancer: Where Do We Stand and Future Perspective.

Authors:  Alessandra Borgheresi; Federica De Muzio; Andrea Agostini; Letizia Ottaviani; Alessandra Bruno; Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Ginevra Danti; Federica Flammia; Roberta Grassi; Francesca Grassi; Federico Bruno; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Antonio Barile; Vittorio Miele; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Predictive Value of [18F]FDG PET/CT for Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Sung Hoon Kim; Bong-Il Song; Beong Woo Kim; Hae Won Kim; Kyoung Sook Won; Sung Uk Bae; Woon Kyung Jeong; Seong Kyu Baek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer: Parametric evaluation of morphological, functional and molecular tomographic imaging.

Authors:  Pier Paolo Mainenti; Arnaldo Stanzione; Salvatore Guarino; Valeria Romeo; Lorenzo Ugga; Federica Romano; Giovanni Storto; Simone Maurea; Arturo Brunetti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Prognostic value of metabolic parameters on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron tomography/computed tomography in classical rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Byung Wook Choi; Sungmin Kang; Sung Uk Bae; Woon Kyung Jeong; Seong Kyu Baek; Bong-Il Song; Kyoung Sook Won; Hae Won Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Clinical Significance of Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/computed Tomography in the Follow-up of Colorectal Cancer: Searching off Approaches Increasing Specificity for Detection of Recurrence.

Authors:  Semra Ince; Kursat Okuyucu; Oguz Hancerliogulları; Engin Alagoz; Huseyin San; Nuri Arslan
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Retrospective analysis of the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression and 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hao Jiang; Rongjun Zhang; Huijie Jiang; Mingyu Zhang; Wei Guo; Jifeng Zhang; Xinglu Zhou; Wenbin Pan; Sheng Zhao; Ping Li
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.207

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.