| Literature DB >> 27447172 |
Iban Aldecoa1, Begoña Atares2, Jordi Tarragona3, Laia Bernet4, Jose Domingo Sardon5, Teresa Pereda6, Carlos Villar7, M Carmen Mendez8, Elvira Gonzalez-Obeso8, Kepa Elorriaga9, Guadalupe Lopez Alonso10, Javier Zamora11, Nuria Planell12, Jose Palacios13, Antoni Castells14, Xavier Matias-Guiu3, Miriam Cuatrecasas15,16.
Abstract
Stage I-II (pN0) colorectal cancer patients are surgically treated although up to 25 % will eventually die from disease recurrence. Lymph node (LN) status is an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (CRC), and molecular tumour detection in LN of early-stage CRC patients is associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence and poor survival. This prospective multicentre study aimed to determine the relationship between LN molecular tumour burden and conventional high-risk factors in stage I-II colon cancer patients. A total of 1940 LN from 149 pathologically assessed pN0 colon cancer patients were analysed for the amount of tumour cytokeratin 19 (CK19) messenger RNA (mRNA) with the quantitative reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification molecular assay One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification. Patient's total tumour load (TTL) resulted from the sum of all CK19 mRNA tumour copies/μL of each positive LN from the colectomy specimen. A median of 15 LN were procured per case (IQR 12;20). Molecular positivity correlated with high-grade (p < 0.01), mucinous/signet ring type (p = 0.017), male gender (p = 0.02), number of collected LN (p = 0.012) and total LN weight per case (p < 0.01). The TTL was related to pT stage (p = 0.01) and tumour size (p < 0.01) in low-grade tumours. Multivariate logistic regression showed independent correlation of molecular positivity with gender, tumour grade and number of fresh LN [AUC = 0.71 (95 % CI = 0.62-0.79)]. Our results show that lymph node CK19 mRNA detection correlates with classical high-risk factors in stage I-II colon cancer patients. Total tumour load is a quantitative and objective measure that may help to better stage early colon cancer patients.Entities:
Keywords: Colorectal neoplasms; Cytokeratin 19; Lymph nodes; Molecular pathology; Neoplasm staging
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27447172 PMCID: PMC5033997 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-016-1990-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virchows Arch ISSN: 0945-6317 Impact factor: 4.064
Fig. 2Study flow diagram
Fig. 1a A primary high-grade mucinous carcinoma with signet ring cells. b Positive CK19 immunohistochemistry from the same case. c Amplification curve of CK19 mRNA from a positive LN, assessed through turbidity variation (Y-axis) over time (X-axis, minutes). (Fig. 1a, b, scale bar 250 μm)
Patient’s demographics and specimen characteristics and correlation with CK19 mRNA results
| Clinical parameter |
| CK19 mRNA negative | CK19 mRNA positive |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | 149 (100) | 73 (49.0) | 76 (51.0) | – |
| Gender | 0.02 | |||
| Male | 97 (65.1) | 41 (42.3) | 56 (57.7) | |
| Female | 52 (34.9) | 32 (61.5) | 20 (38.5) | |
| Age (years) | 67 (61–75) | 68 (61–74) | 66 (61–75) | 0.89 |
| Surgical specimen characteristics | ||||
| Specimen size (cm) | 20 (15–25) | 20 (15–25) | 19.5 (15–25) | 0.81 |
| Tumour size (cm)a—median (IQR) | 3 (2–5) | 3 (2–4) | 4 (2–5.5) | 0.045 |
| Large tumours (>4 cm) | 39 (26.7) | 14 (38.9) | 25 (64.1) | 0.09 |
| Small tumours (≤4 cm) | 107 (73.3) | 57 (53.3) | 50 (46.7) | |
| Tumour location | 0.33 | |||
| Right colon and caecum (incl. hepatic flexure) | 67 (45) | 37 (55.2) | 30 (44.8) | |
| Transverse colon | 14 (9.4) | 5 (35.7) | 9 (64.3) | |
| Left colon and sigmoid colon (incl. splenic flexure) | 68 (45.6) | 31 (45.6) | 37 (54.4) | |
| Macroscopic tumour configuration | 0.57 | |||
| Annular | 8 (5.4) | 5 (62.5) | 3 (37.5) | |
| Ulcerated | 65 (43.6) | 33 (50.8) | 32 (49.2) | |
| Polypoid | 75 (50.3) | 34 (45.3) | 41 (54.7) | |
| Other | 1 (0.7) | 1 (100) | 0 (0) | |
| Vascular invasion | 0.45 | |||
| No | 137 (91.9) | 65 (47.4) | 72 (52.6) | |
| Yes | 12 (8.1) | 8 (66.7) | 4 (33.3) | |
| Histological type | 0.017 | |||
| Adenocarcinoma | 136 (91.3) | 71 (52.2) | 65 (47.8) | |
| Mucinous/signet ring cell AC | 13 (8.7) | 2 (15.4) | 11 (84.6) | |
| Gradeb | <0.01 | |||
| High grade | 22 (15.0) | 4 (18.2) | 18 (81.8) | |
| Low grade | 125 (85.0) | 69 (55.2) | 56 (44.8) | |
| pT | 0.19 | |||
| pT1 | 40 (26.8) | 17 (42.5) | 23 (57.5) | |
| pT2 | 31 (20.8) | 20 (64.5) | 11 (35.5) | |
| pT3 | 66 (44.3) | 29 (43.9) | 37 (56.1) | |
| pT4a | 12 (8.1) | 7 (58.3) | 5 (41.7) | |
IQR interquartile range, AC adenocarcinoma
aIn three patients, tumour size could not be assessed
bIn two patients, tumour grade could not be assessed
Fig. 3OSNA results and correlation with LN retrieval and pT stage, regarding number of LN retrieved (a), time spent on fresh LN search in minutes (b) and total weight of fresh LN per case (gr) (c). OSNA positive cases held significantly more LN due to a higher fresh LN yields. d Shows that most cases in every pT stage held up to 3 OSNA positive LN. e Although not significant, a trend was observed between pT stage and TTL
Logistic regression of clinical and histological variables related to CK19 mRNA positivity
| Variables | Univariate model | Multivariate model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95 % CI) | Wald test | OR (95 % CI) | Wald test | |
| Gender (male vs female) | 2.2 (1.1–4.4) | 0.026 | 3.1 (1.4–7.0) | 0.006 |
| Age (years) | 0.99 (0.96–1.03) | 0.74 | – | – |
| Tumour size | 1.2 (1.0–1.4) | 0.06 | – | – |
| Tumour location | 0.31 | – | – | |
| Transverse colon vs right colon and caecum (including hepatic flexure) | 2.2 (0.7–7.9) | |||
| Left colon and sigmoid colon (including splenic flexure) vs Right colon and caecum (including hepatic flexure) | 1.4 (0.7–2.9) | |||
| Macroscopic tumour configuration | 0.59 | – | – | |
| Ulcerated vs annular | 1.6 (0.4–8.4) | |||
| Polypoid vs annular | 2.0 (0.5–10.4) | |||
| Histological type (mucinous / signet ring cell AC vs adenocarcinoma) | 0.02 | – | – | |
| 6.0 (1.5–39.8) | ||||
| Vascular invasion (yes vs no) | 0.5 (0.1–1.5) | 0.21 | – | – |
| Grade (high vs low) | 5.4 (1.9–19.5) | <0.01 | 4.8 (1.5–18.9) | 0.013 |
| pT | 0.20 | – | – | |
| pT2 vs pT1 | 0.4 (0.2–1.1) | |||
| pT3 vs pT1 | 0.9 (0.4–2.1) | |||
| pT4a vs pT1 | 0.5 (0.1–1.9) | |||
| Fresh LN per case weight (gr) | 1.1 (1.0–1.1) | <0.01 | 1.1 (1.0–1.2) | 0.017 |
AC adenocarcinoma, gr grammes
Fig. 4ROC curve of the multivariate logistic regression model for OSNA results including gender, grade and the number of fresh lymph nodes as variables predicting molecular positivity. Continuous line: All data (0.71 (95 % CI = 0.62–0.79); Dashed line: 10-fold CV (AUC = 0.67 [95 % CI = 0.59–0.76])
Total tumour load distribution in high and low-grade tumours
| pT | CK19 mRNA copies/μL per case | Total |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <1000 | <2000 | <6000 | ≥6000 | |||
| All cases | 0.246 | |||||
| pT1 | 8 (34.8)a | 6 (26.1) | 6 (26.1) | 3 (13.0) | 23 (100) | |
| pT2 | 1 (9.1) | 5 (45.4) | 3 (27.3) | 2 (18.2) | 11 (100) | |
| pT3 | 9 (24.3) | 6 (16.2) | 8 (21.6)a | 14 (37.8) | 37 (100) | |
| pT4a | 2 (40.0) | 1 (20.0) | 2 (40.0) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (100) | |
| Total | 20 (26.3) | 18 (23.7) | 19 (25) | 19 (25) | 76 (100) | |
| High grade | 0.61 | |||||
| pT1 | 1 (20.0) | 1 (20.0) | 2 (40.0) | 1 (20.0) | 5 (100) | |
| pT2 | 1 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (50.0) | 2 (100) | |
| pT3 | 1 (12.5) | 4 (50.0) | 1 (12.5) | 2 (25.0) | 8 (100) | |
| pT4a | 1 (33.3) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (66.7) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (100) | |
| Total | 4 (22.2) | 5 (27.8) | 5 (27.8) | 4 (22.2) | 18 (100) | |
| Low grade | 0.01 | |||||
| pT1 | 6 (35.3) | 5 (29.4) | 4 (23.5) | 2 (11.8) | 17 (100) | |
| pT2 | 0 (0.0) | 5 (55.6) | 3 (33.3) | 1 (11.1) | 9 (100) | |
| pT3 | 8 (28.6) | 2 (7.1) | 6 (21.4) | 12 (42.9) | 28 (100) | |
| pT4a | 1 (50.0) | 1 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (100) | |
| Total | 15 (26.8) | 13 (23.2) | 13 (23.2) | 15 (26.8) | 56 (100) | |
aIn two patients, tumour grade could not be assessed