Literature DB >> 27447140

Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.

Ravel M Sousa, Paulo Cézar Simamoto-Junior, Alfredo Júlio Fernandes-Neto, Jos Vander Sloten, Siegfried Vn Jaecques, Roberto S Pessoa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of different implant numbers and connection types on the biomechanical behavior of mandibular full-arch implant-supported rehabilitation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography-based finite element models comprising a totally edentulous mandible and 3.8 × 13-mmdiameter implants, abutments, abutment screws, bar retaining screw, and bar were constructed. Different implant numbers (three, four, and five implants) and loading conditions (symmetrical/balanced, unilateral, and posterior with diverse loading magnitudes) were simulated for both external hex and Morse-taper connections. The peak equivalent strain (EQV strain) in the bone and the peak of von Mises stress (EQV stress) in the abutment screw and bar retaining screw were evaluated.
RESULTS: Lower strain values were observed for a symmetrical loading distribution. Considering the same loading conditions, significantly higher bone strain levels were observed for external hex, compared with the Morse-taper connection. The number of implants had no significant influence on strain levels in bone, irrespective of the connection types. Compared with the external hex connection, the Morse-taper connection type presented significantly lower EQV stress values in abutment screws, but significantly higher stress in the bar retaining screw. Increasing the number of implants significantly reduced the EQV stress in the abutment screw and bar retaining screw.
CONCLUSION: The Morse-taper connection type significantly decreased the strain levels in peri-implant bone, while increasing the stress in bar retaining screws. A smaller number of implants in an inferior full-arch rehabilitation slightly increased the stress in the abutment and bar retaining screws. Balanced adjustments of the loading improve the biomechanics of a mandibular full-arch rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27447140     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.4785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  3 in total

1.  Mechanical analysis of prosthetic bars and dental implants in 3 and 4 implant-supported overdenture protocols using finite element analysis.

Authors:  Luiz Bassi-Junior; Rafael Oliveira de Souza Silva; Victor Hugo Dias Dos Santos; Abner da Rocha Lourenço; Paulo Vinicius Trevizoli; Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Polyane Mazucatto Queiroz; Vilmar Divanir Gottardo
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-05-15

Review 2.  The use of three implants to support a fixed prosthesis in the management of the edentulous mandible: a systematic review.

Authors:  Murtaza Hirani; Maria Devine; Olamide Obisesan; Cathy Bryant
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-06-17

3.  Implant-supported bar overdentures in patients treated surgically for head and neck cancer: Two case reports.

Authors:  Nadine Omeish; Benjamin Pomes; Hélène Citterio
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.