| Literature DB >> 27446570 |
Tatsuo Shimura1, Yasuhide Kofunato2, Ryo Okada2, Rei Yashima2, Koji Okada3, Kenichiro Araki3, Yasuo Hosouchi4, Hiroyuki Kuwano3, Seiichi Takenoshita2.
Abstract
Despite strict criteria for the observation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), it remains difficult to distinguish invasive IPMN from non-invasive IPMN. The aim of the present study was to identify an indicator of invasive IPMN. The present study retrospectively evaluated 53 patients (28 with non-invasive and 25 with invasive IPMN) who underwent resection of IPMN, and examined the usefulness of the MIB-1 labeling index as an indicator of invasive IPMN. The MIB-1 labeling indexes in patients with invasive IPMN were significantly higher compared with those with non-invasive IPMN (P<0.001). A receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that the area under the curve was 0.822. These results suggested that a cut-off level for the MIB-1 labeling index should be set to 15.5% to distinguish invasive from non-invasive IPMN. A multivariate analysis using a logistic regression model revealed the MIB-1 labeling index (hazard ratio, 18.692; 95% confidential interval, 4.171-83.760; P<0.001) and the existence of mural nodules (hazard ratio, 6.187, 95% confidential interval, 1.039-36.861; P=0.045) were predictive factors for invasive IPMN. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between patients with a lower MIB-1 labeling index and patients with a higher MIB-1 labeling index (P=0.798). The MIB-1 labeling index must be considered as a candidate for the classification of IPMN.Entities:
Keywords: IPMN; Ki-67; MIB-1; invasive IPMN; mural nodule
Year: 2016 PMID: 27446570 PMCID: PMC4950762 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2016.908
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Clin Oncol ISSN: 2049-9450