| Literature DB >> 27446208 |
Fatih Kuzu1, Dilek Arpaci1, Mustafa Unal1, Ayfer Altas2, Gürkan Haytaoglu2, Murat Can3, Figen Barut4, Furuzan Kokturk5, Sevil Uygun Ilikhan2, Taner Bayraktaroglu1.
Abstract
Background. Midkine (MK), a new heparin-binding growth factor, plays important roles in a variety of biological phenomena such as carcinogenesis, inflammation, and angiogenesis. In this study, we aimed to evaluate serum midkine (SMK) and nodular midkine (NMK) levels in patients with thyroid nodules to predict malignancy and whether there was any association between. Methods. A total of 105 patients (74 women, 31 men) with thyroid nodules were enrolled. The levels of SMK and NMK were measured. Any possible correlation between SMK, NMK, and biochemical, cytopathological, or radiological variables was investigated. Results. Both SMK and NMK were found to be higher in hypoechoic nodules with an irregular border and without a halo (p < 0.05). Serum MK levels were significantly higher in nodules with microcalcifications than nodules with macrocalcification or without calcification (p = 0.001). SMK levels were found to be correlated with NMK levels (SMK 0.63 ng/ml versus 1.04 ng/mL and NMK 0.55 ng/mL versus 0.55 ng/mL, r (2) = 0.54, p < 0.001). Conclusion. Both SMK and NMK can predict tumorigenesis of highly malignant/suspicious thyroid cytopathology and also well correlated with sonographic features of thyroid nodules. We suggest that MK levels may serve as an alternative biomarker, in conjunction with the cytopathological results in preoperative assessment of thyroid nodules.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27446208 PMCID: PMC4944023 DOI: 10.1155/2016/6035024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Endocrinol ISSN: 1687-8337 Impact factor: 3.257
Demographic and clinical characteristics in relation to serum midkine (SMK) and nodular midkine (NMK) concentrations.
| Demographic and clinical characteristics | SMK | NMK |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Female | 0.60 | 0.52 |
| Male | 0.63 (0.30–4.97) | 0.68 (0.35–1.73) |
|
| 0.912 | 0.223 |
| Age (years) | ||
| <40 | 0.67 (0.37–4.97) | 0.56 (0.38–1.73) |
| 40–59 | 0.60 (0.30–2.77) | 0.52 (0.35–1.45) |
| ≥60 | 0.60 (0.40–2.03) | 0.55 (0.37–0.82) |
|
| 0.396 | 0.298 |
| TSH ( | ||
| <0.4 | 0.57 (0.33–2.03) | 0.52 (0.35–0.82) |
| 0.4–4 | 0.63 (0.30–4.97) | 0.53 (0.35–1.73) |
| >4 | 0.63 (0.50–1.37) | 0.58 (0.43–0.62) |
|
| 0.467 | 0.529 |
BMI: body mass index; TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone.
Sonographic correlations of SMK/NMK concentrations.
| Sonographic features | SMK | NMK |
|---|---|---|
| Nodule volume | ||
| <10 mL | 0.60 (0.30–4.97) | 0.52 (0.37–1.73) |
| 10–20 mL | 0.63 (0.33–4.13) | 0.57 (0.35–1.50) |
| >20 mL | 0.63 (0.33–2.47) | 0.55 (0.35–0.97) |
|
| 0.809 | 0.658 |
| Nodular echogenicity | ||
| Hypoechoic | 0.90 (0.47–4.97) | 0.59 (0.35–1.73) |
| Hyperechoic | 0.55 (0.40–0.93) | 0.55 (0.40–0.68) |
| Isoechoic | 0.53 (0.30–1.47) | 0.48 (0.35–0.80) |
|
| <0.001 | 0.003 |
| Calcification | ||
| Microcalcification | 1.20 (0.60–4.13) | 0.60 (0.43–1.50) |
| Macrocalcification | 0.63 (0.37–1.10) | 0.56 (0.35–0.65) |
| No calcification | 0.57 (0.30–4.97) | 0.52 (0.35–1.73) |
|
| 0.001 | 0.308 |
| Border | ||
| Regular | 0.59 (0.30–4.97) | 0.49 (0.35–1.73) |
| Irregular | 0.90 (0.37–2.77) | 0.60 (0.40–1.45) |
|
| 0.015 | 0.001 |
| Halo | ||
| Present | 0.57 (0.30–4.97) | 0.50 (0.35–1.73) |
| Absent | 0.70 (0.37–4.13) | 0.58 (0.35–1.50) |
|
| 0.003 | 0.019 |
| Nodule structure | ||
| Heterogeneous | 0.67 (0.30–4.13) | 0.57 (0.35–1.57) |
| Homogeneous | 0.53 (0.40–4.97) | 0.48 (0.38–1.73) |
|
| 0.023 | 0.031 |
| Number of nodules | ||
| Solitary | 0.70 (0.47–2.77) | 0.57 (0.38–1.45) |
| Multiple | 0.60 (0.30–4.97) | 0.53 (0.35–1.73) |
|
| 0.198 | 0.356 |
(Hint: ∗: statistically significant.)
The relationship between SMK/NMK concentrations and fine needle aspiration cytology/histopathology results.
| SMK (median) | Mean ± SD | 95% CI | NMK (median) | Mean ± SD | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cytopathology | ||||||
| Benign ( | 0.60 (0.30–4.97) | 0.77 ± 0.65 | 0.62–0.93 | 0.52 (0.35–1.73) | 0.55 ± 0.21 | 0.50–0.60 |
| Suspicious/ | 1.37 (0.50–4.13) | 1.47 ± 1.11 | 0.61–2.32 | 0.62 (0.43–1.50) | 0.72 ± 0.31 | 0.48–0.96 |
|
| 0.005 | <0.001 | 0.015 | 0.005 | ||
| Histopathology | ||||||
| Follicular adenoma/ | 0.63 (0.30–4.13) | 0.78 ± 0.71 | 0.50–1.06 | 0.55 (0.35–1.50) | 0.55 ± 0.20 | 0.47–0.64 |
| Differentiated thyroid | 1.04 (0.48–1.53) | 1.03 ± 0.42 | 0.58–1.47 | 0.57 (0.48–0.80) | 0.59 ± 0.13 | 0.46–0.73 |
|
| 0.066 | <0.001 | 0.341 | 0.050 | ||
Figure 1Serum and nodular MK levels evaluated according to FNA cytology.
Figure 2Correlation between serum and nodular midkine levels.