| Literature DB >> 27446157 |
Francesca Sparvoli1, Monica Laureati2, Roberto Pilu3, Ella Pagliarini2, Ivan Toschi3, Gianluca Giuberti4, Paola Fortunati4, Maria G Daminati1, Eleonora Cominelli1, Roberto Bollini1.
Abstract
Consumption of legumes is associated with a number of physiological and health benefits. Legume proteins complement very well those of cereals and are often used to produce gluten-free products. However, legume seeds often contain antinutritional compounds, such as phytate, galactooligosaccharides, phenolic compounds, lectins, enzyme inhibitors, whose presence could affect their nutritional value. Screening natural and induced biodiversity for useful traits, followed by breeding, is a way to remove undesirable components. We used the common bean cv. Lady Joy and the lpa1 mutant line, having different seed composition for absence/presence of lectins,α-amylase inhibitor, (α-AI) and phytic acid, to verify the advantage of their use to make biscuits with improved nutritional properties. We showed that use of unprocessed flour from normal beans (Taylor's Horticulture and Billò) must be avoided, since lectin activity is still present after baking, and demonstrated the advantage of using the cv. Lady Joy, lacking active lectins and having active α-AI. To assess the contribution of bean flour to biscuit quality traits, different formulations of composite flours (B12, B14, B22, B24, B29) were used in combinations with wheat (B14), maize (gluten-free B22 and B29), or with both (B12 and B24). These biscuits were nutritionally better than the control, having a better amino acid score, higher fiber amount, lower predicted glycemic index (pGI) and starch content. Replacement of cv. Lady Joy bean flour with that of lpa1, having a 90% reduction of phytic acid and devoid of α-AI, contributed to about a 50% reduction of phytic acid content. We also showed that baking did not fully inactivate α-AI, further contributing to lowering the pGI of the biscuits. Finally, data from a blind taste test using consumers indicated that the B14 biscuit was accepted by consumers and comparable in terms of liking to the control biscuit, although the acceptability of these products decreased with the increase of bean content. The B22 gluten-free biscuits, although received liking scores that were just above the middle point of the hedonic scale, might represent a good compromise between health benefits (absence of gluten and lower pGI), expectations of celiac consumers and likeness.Entities:
Keywords: amino acid score; biscuits; consumers test; lectins; nutritional enhancement; phytic acid; predicted glycemic index; α-amylase inhibitor
Year: 2016 PMID: 27446157 PMCID: PMC4921496 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00928
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1SDS-PAGE analysis (A), immunoblot profiles (B), and hemagglutination test (C) of the seed extracts from the different genotypes used to prepare the bean containing biscuits. G12894, wild accession containing PHA-E. The major storage proteins are indicated. Red bar, Phsl, phaseolin polypeptides; blu bar, α-AI; asterisk, PHA-E; circle, PHA-L; dotted circle, pinto lectin.
Main ingredients composition of biscuit samples.
| Control | 360 | 180 | − | 29 | 14 | − | 540 | 110 | 300 | 300 | 1250 |
| B12 | 240 | 150 | 150 | 19 | 12 | 12 | 540 | 110 | 300 | 300 | 1250 |
| B14 | 360 | − | 180 | 29 | − | 14 | 540 | 110 | 300 | 300 | 1250 |
| B22 | − | 270 | 270 | − | 22 | 22 | 540 | 110 | 300 | 300 | 1250 |
| B24 | 120 | 120 | 300 | 10 | 10 | 24 | 540 | 110 | 300 | 300 | 1250 |
| B29 | − | 180 | 360 | − | 14 | 29 | 540 | 110 | 300 | 300 | 1250 |
Figure 2Appearance of bean biscuits and bean seeds of the cv. Lady Joy and .
Figure 3Hemagglutination test of extracts from defatted flours of sample biscuits (B14 type) and corresponding bean seed flours of cv. Lady Joy (LJ), . Control shows erythrocytes incubated with an equivalent voulme of PBS buffer, instead of the seed extract. Arrows and arrowheads indicate the agglutination limit. Samples dilutions are indicated.
Figure 4SDS-PAGE analysis of extracts from defatted flours of sample biscuits (B14-B29, CTRL, control biscuit) and cv. Lady Joy seed extract (LJ). MW molecular weight markers. Bar indicates phaseolin polypeptides (Phsl).
α-amylase inhibitory activity in extracts of defatted biscuit flours and bean flours of cv. Lady Joy (LJ), cv. Tayolor's Horticultural (TH), Billò (B), the .
| Flour | cv. Lady Joy | – | 1048.42 ± 94.5 | |||
| Biscuits | Control | 0 | 0.00 | 37.56± 41.28 | 0.00 | |
| B12 | 16 | 167.75 | 94.53± 20.44 | 56.35 | ||
| B14 | 19 | 199.20 | 203.98± 8.060 | 102.40 | ||
| B22 | 28 | 293.56 | 222.73± 40.77 | 75.87 | ||
| B24 | 32 | 335.50 | 209.61± 18.67 | 62.48 | ||
| B29 | 38 | 398.40 | 196.64± 37.90 | 49.36 | ||
| Flours | cv. Lady Joy | 1132.47 ± 161.7 | ||||
| cv. Taylor's H. | 1226.04 ± 164.0 | |||||
| Billò | 1181.99 ± 76.9 | |||||
| 0.00 | ||||||
| Biscuits | B14 (LJ) | 19 | 215.17 | 234.96± 23.50 | 109.20 | |
| B14 (TH) | 19 | 232.95 | 160.68± 60.06 | 68.98 | ||
| B14-OB (TH) | 19 | 232.95 | 48.65± 2.4 | 20.88 | ||
| B14 (B) | 19 | 224.58 | 169.16± 48.87 | 75.32 | ||
| B14 ( | 19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Units of inhibited α-amylase are per 100mg of flours (U α-AI/100 mg).
Values are the product of α-AI activity in bean flour x the percent of bean flour in defatted biscuit. B12-B29: see Table 1.
Phytic acid (PA) content in biscuit samples (defatted flours) and bean flours of the .
| Biscuits | B14 ( | 1.91± 0.03 |
| B14 (LJ) | 4.63± 0.81 | |
| B14 (Taylor's H.) | 3.78± 0.65 | |
| Flours | 2.38± 0.05 | |
| Lady Joy cv. | 9.32± 0.23 | |
| Taylor's H. cv. | 10.53± 1.01 |
Proximate composition and .
| Control | 97.1 ± 0.03 | 1.21 ± 0.03 | 7.07 ± 0.00 | 22.4 ± 0.26 | 1.40 ± 0.06 | 0.96 ± 0.07 | 0.77 ± 0.11 | 1.80 ± 0.13 | 31.2 ± 0.06 | 41.9 ± 0.96 | 22.4 ± 0.230 | 89.0 ± 0.35 |
| B12 | 94.6 ± 0.04 | 1.87 ± 0.00 | 8.07 ± 0.23 | 24.4 ± 0.15 | 3.44 ± 0.17 | 2.07 ± 0.01 | 0.80 ± 0.00 | 1.70 ± 0.05 | 30.3 ± 0.14 | 31.1 ± 0.07 | 22.0 ± 0.005 | 80.6 ± 0.99 |
| B14 | 95.7 ± 0.03 | 2.09 ± 0.00 | 9.24 ± 0.21 | 24.5 ± 0.49 | 2.23 ± 0.08 | 2.05 ± 0.03 | 0.77 ± 0.01 | 2.06 ± 0.26 | 30.9 ± 0.61 | 29.8 ± 0.02 | 22.6 ± 0.001 | 74.2 ± 1.34 |
| B22 | 94.8 ± 0.00 | 2.21 ± 0.02 | 8.79 ± 0.02 | 24.5 ± 0.50 | 4.25 ± 0.68 | 3.04 ± 0.06 | 0.89 ± 0.18 | 1.90 ± 0.12 | 31.9 ± 0.76 | 30.5 ± 1.17 | 22.5 ± 0.090 | 70.7 ± 0.57 |
| B24 | 95.3 ± 0.02 | 2.03 ± 0.03 | 8.94 ± 0.04 | 26.3 ± 0.10 | 3.45 ± 0.16 | 2.67 ± 0.03 | 0.92 ± 0.04 | 1.61 ± 0.23 | 31.1 ± 0.88 | 28.5 ± 0.31 | 22.6 ± 0.070 | 66.2 ± 0.92 |
| B29 | 95.0 ± 0.12 | 2.32 ± 0.01 | 10.3 ± 0.26 | 23.3 ± 0.14 | 3.68 ± 0.17 | 2.98 ± 0.05 | 0.87 ± 0.22 | 2.28 ± 0.15 | 32.1 ± 0.77 | 26.4 ± 0.20 | 22.2 ± 0.180 | 61.9 ± 1.41 |
| B14 (LJ) | 92.9 ± 0.17 | 1.74 ± 0.14 | 11.2 ± 0.09 | 21.6 ± 0.09 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 30.2 ± 0.20 | 34.3 ± 0.58 | nd | 66.0 ± 0.71 |
| B14 ( | 94.4 ± 0.06 | 1.87 ± 0.14 | 12.0 ± 0.08 | 19.5 ± 0.58 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 29.5 ± 1.10 | 32.2 ± 0.53 | nd | 70.3 ± 0.21 |
| B14 (TH) | 94.5 ± 0.06 | 2.05 ± 0.14 | 11.3 ± 0.05 | 20.9 ± 0.33 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 30.3 ± 0.69 | 29.9 ± 0.53 | nd | 64.6 ± 1.70 |
| B14 (B) | 91.6 ± 0.08 | 1.74 ± 0.14 | 13.3 ± 0.02 | 21.6 ± 0.49 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 29.9 ± 0.78 | 29.6 ± 0.54 | nd | 64.5 ± 2.19 |
B12–B29: see Table 1.
Values are mean ± standard deviation of three independent determinations (dry weight basis), except for total sugars, the in vitro glycemic index classification, which were run in duplicate.
NDF, Neutral Detergent Fiber (cellulose, emicellulose, lignin).
ADF, Acid Detergent Fiber (cellulose, lignin).
GE, Gross Energy.
pGI, predicted Glycemic Index, calculated using commercial white wheat bread as reference (pGI = 94.4).
Total amino acid composition of biscuit samples (g/100 g defatted flour) and bean flours of cv. Lady Joy (LJ), cv. Tayolor's Horticultural (TH), and .
| Control | 0.337 | 0.144 | 0.041 | 0.175 | 0.141 | 0.379 | 0.496 | 0.229 | 0.323 | 0.572 | 2.354 | 0.940 | 0.299 | 0.395 | 0.722 | 0.300 | 0.309 | 0.268 | 21.4 | 8.75 |
| B12 | 0.371 | 0.314 | 0.057 | 0.170 | 0.170 | 0.496 | 0.625 | 0.220 | 0.404 | 0.745 | 2.318 | 0.942 | 0.357 | 0.455 | 0.809 | 0.352 | 0.569 | 0.302 | 23.6 | 10.05 |
| B14 | 0.461 | 0.485 | 0.096 | 0.165 | 0.173 | 0.590 | 0.713 | 0.325 | 0.509 | 0.809 | 2.748 | 1.277 | 0.446 | 0.478 | 0.876 | 0.378 | 0.568 | 0.401 | 22.8 | 12.03 |
| B22 | 0.472 | 0.454 | 0.058 | 0.156 | 0.189 | 0.575 | 0.544 | 0.353 | 0.475 | 1.020 | 1.947 | 1.312 | 0.405 | 0.580 | 1.005 | 0.405 | 0.557 | 0.238 | 23.4 | 11.28 |
| B24 | 0.473 | 0.491 | 0.080 | 0.168 | 0.185 | 0.591 | 0.757 | 0.352 | 0.488 | 1.025 | 2.251 | 1.430 | 0.438 | 0.551 | 0.939 | 0.401 | 0.599 | 0.316 | 22.5 | 11.91 |
| B29 | 0.532 | 0.540 | 0.084 | 0.164 | 0.194 | 0.656 | 0.724 | 0.370 | 0.531 | 1.141 | 2.239 | 1.392 | 0.469 | 0.614 | 1.063 | 0.438 | 0.643 | 0.251 | 24.0 | 12.85 |
| LJ | 1.005 | 1.602 | 0.223 | 0.261 | 0.326 | 1.327 | 1.272 | 0.798 | 1.086 | 2.442 | 3.799 | 3.973 | 0.932 | 1.037 | 1.792 | 0.703 | 1.463 | 0.313 | − | 24.86 |
| TH | 1.186 | 1.741 | 0.243 | 0.252 | 0.307 | 1.526 | 1.416 | 0.819 | 1.241 | 2.985 | 4.300 | 5.037 | 1.043 | 1.120 | 2.024 | 0.722 | 1.793 | 0.374 | − | 28.20 |
| 1.120 | 1.861 | 0.228 | 0.282 | 0.334 | 1.521 | 1.377 | 0.875 | 1.269 | 3.010 | 4.638 | 5.334 | 1.073 | 1.104 | 2.130 | 0.748 | 1.851 | 0.396 | − | 29.11 |
Percent amino acid variations in biscuit samples containing different amounts of cv. Lady Joy bean flour compared to control biscuits.
| B12 | 10.09 | 118.06 | 39.02 | −2.86 | 20.57 | 7.59 | 30.87 | 26.01 | −3.93 | 25.08 | 30.24 | −1.53 | 0.21 | 19.40 | 15.19 | 12.05 | 17.33 | 84.14 | 14.86 |
| B14 | 36.80 | 236.81 | 134.15 | −5.71 | 22.70 | 6.96 | 55.67 | 43.75 | 41.92 | 57.59 | 41.43 | 16.74 | 35.85 | 49.16 | 21.01 | 21.33 | 26.00 | 83.82 | 37.49 |
| B22 | 40.06 | 215.28 | 41.46 | −10.86 | 34.04 | 9.18 | 51.72 | 9.68 | 54.15 | 47.06 | 78.32 | −17.29 | 39.57 | 35.45 | 46.84 | 39.20 | 35.00 | 80.26 | 28.91 |
| B24 | 40.36 | 240.97 | 95.12 | −4.00 | 31.21 | 11.71 | 55.94 | 52.62 | 53.71 | 51.08 | 79.20 | −4.38 | 52.13 | 46.49 | 39.49 | 30.06 | 33.67 | 93.85 | 36.11 |
| B29 | 57.86 | 275.00 | 104.88 | −6.29 | 37.59 | 13.29 | 73.09 | 45.97 | 61.57 | 64.40 | 99.48 | −4.89 | 48.09 | 56.86 | 55.44 | 47.23 | 46.00 | 108.09 | 46.86 |
| Average (B12–B29) | 37.03 | 217.22 | 82.93 | −5.94 | 29.22 | 9.75 | 53.46 | 35.60 | 41.48 | 49.04 | 65.73 | −2.27 | 35.17 | 41.47 | 35.59 | 29.97 | 31.60 | 90.03 | 32.85 |
Results of the consumer test (.
| Control | 69.8 ± 2.3 | |
| B12 | 60.7 ± 2.5 | |
| B14 | 64.6 ± 2.5 | |
| B22 | 54.5 ± 2.5 | |
| B24 | 55.1 ± 2.7 | |
| B29 | 45.5 ± 2.7 |
Identical letters indicate there is no statistically significant difference between the samples according to LSD post-hoc test. Consumers liking was expressed according to a 100-mm linear hedonic scale anchored at the extremes with “dislike extremely” (left of the scale, score = 0) and “like extremely” (right of the scale, score = 100).