Literature DB >> 27446065

Draft Genome Sequence of Bacillus pumilus ku-bf1 Isolated from the Gut Contents of Wood Boring Mesomorphus sp.

Jatoth Balsingh1, Surabhi Radhakrishna1, Kandasamy Ulaganathan1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacillus pumilus; Mesomorphus; bioethanol; cellulolytic bacteria; genome sequencing; xylose isomerase

Year:  2016        PMID: 27446065      PMCID: PMC4927586          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

The threat of climate change has intensified efforts toward the development of safer alternatives to depleting fossil fuels (Cox et al., 2000). Lignocellulosic bioethanol is considered to be a viable and environmentally friendly alternative to fossil fuels. Though lignocellulosic biomass is available in massive quantities and is renewable (Dillon and Dillon, 2003; Lynd et al., 2008; Pauly and Keegstra, 2008; Kricka et al., 2015), the presence of certain barriers makes lignocellulosic bioethanol expensive. Discovery of proteins with novel specificities is necessary to break these barriers and make lignocellulosic bioethanol economically viable (Horn et al., 2012; Ulaganathan et al., 2015). Cellulolytic bacteria isolated from various environments have been explored for proteins of potential use in lignocellulosic bioethanol production (Badger, 2002; Wang et al., 2012; Pinheiro et al., 2015). Bacteria belonging to the genera Bacillus, Bacteroides, Butyrivibrio, Cellulosimicrobium, Citrobacter, Clostridium, Devosia, Dyadobacter, Ensifer, Kaistia, Labrys, Methanobrevibacter, Microbacterium, Ochrobactrum, Paracoccus, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Ruminococcus, Shinella, Siphonobacter, Stenotrophomonas, Trichonympha, and Variovorax, were found to be cellulolytic (Saxena et al., 1993; Schwarz, 2001; Gupta et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2012; Yanga et al., 2014). Bacillus pumilus strains are known to produce cellulase enzyme up to a maximum of 11.4 mg/g of cell dry mass (Suzuki and Kaneko, 1976; Kotchoni and Shonukan, 2002; Ariffin et al., 2006). The cellulase enzyme produced by B. pumilus strain EB3 has been found to be superior to fungal cellulases due to its higher optimum pH and temperature (Ariffin et al., 2006). Further it has been shown that the B. pumilus cellulase enzyme could be mutated to remove the catabolite repression (Kotchoni et al., 2003). We have recently isolated bacterial strains from the gut contents of the wood boring Mesomorphus sp. These isolates were screened for cellulolytic and xylose isomerase activities and the isolate ku-bf1 which exhibited maximum cellulolytic and xylose isomerase activities was identified as B. pumilus by 16S rRNA sequencing. The whole genome of this strain has been sequenced. The dataset has been submitted to NCBI and is reported here.

Materials and methods

Isolation of the bacterial strain

Bacterial isolates were made by plating the gut contents of wood boring Mesomorphus sp. on YEP-Agar medium (Yeast extract, peptone and agar). After incubation for 24 h at 25°C, the growing bacterial colonies were sub-cultured. These colonies were tested for cellulolytic and xylose isomerase activities on CMC-Agar medium (NH4H2PO4—1 g/L; KCl—0.2 g/L; MgSO4.7H2 O—1 g/L; Yeast Extract—1 g/L; Carboxymethyl Cellulose—26 g/L; Agar—3 g/L) and YEP-Xylose-Agar medium, respectively (Sapunova et al., 2004; Ponnambalam et al., 2011). The bacterial isolate (ku-bf1) which produced maximum clearance zone in both plate assays was selected for this work.

Genomic DNA isolation, library preparation and sequencing

Genomic DNA was isolated using a modified Cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method (Murray and Thompson, 1980; Zhou et al., 1996). The quality of isolated DNA was checked using a Qubit fluorimeter (Thermo Fisher) and 50 ng of pure genomic DNA was used for library preparation. Genomic DNA was fragmented and adapter-tagged using a Sure Select QXTKit (Agilent Technologies). Fragmented DNA was cleaned using HighPrepBeads (MagBio Genomics). Cleaned and adapter tagged fragments were amplified and indexed. The prepared library was quantified using a Qubit Fluorimeter. The quality of the library was checked by running an aliquot (1 ul) on a High Sensitivity Bioanalyzer DNA Chip (Agilent Technologies). The library showed a size range of ~300–1000 bp in the Bioanalyzer profile. The effective insert size of the library was in the range of ~180–880 bp, Whole genome sequencing was carried out with an IluminaMiseq system (Illumina, San Diego, CA) at Genotypic Technology (P) Ltd., Bangalore

Preprocessing and genome assembly

The quality of sequence reads was analyzed using the FastQC tool (Andrews, 2010). Reads were trimmed off adapters using the Fastx-toolkit (Gordon and Hannon, 2010). Reference genome assembly was carried out using the Bowtie2 tool (ver. 2.2.4) (Langmead and Salzberg, 2012). The genome of B. pumilus W3, downloaded from Genbank, was used as the reference genome. Reference based assembly involved indexing of the reference genome and alignment of reads to the reference and creation of a SAM file using SAMtools (ver 0.1.18) (Li et al., 2009). The SAM file was converted to a binary BAM file, sorted and indexed by using the “view,” “sort” and “index” functions of SAMtools, respectively. The BAM file was checked using the BamView tool and used for variation report generation (Carver et al., 2010). The consensus sequence was generated using SAMtools. The variation report in “bcf” format was converted into a “vcf” file using BCFTools.

Results

Whole genome sequencing of B. pumilus ku-bf1

Sequencing the genome of B. pumilus ku-bf1 produced a total of 3,841,334 paired-end reads (150 bp). After removing adapters and low quality reads, the reads were used for reference based genome assembly. These reads were assembled on to the reference genome (B. pumilus W3) using Bowtie-2 (Langmead and Salzberg, 2012). Over 90% of the reads were aligned to the reference genome and the coverage was estimated to be >100x. The BAM file was used for generating the variation report using SAMtools with a mapping quality of >30 and read depth of >20 as cutoffs. The consensus sequence generated was 37,45,118 bp long. NCBI Prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline predicted a total of 3430 protein coding genes, 94 RNA coding genes and 56 pseudogenes. The RNA coding genes predicted include seventy tRNA genes, six 5S rRNA genes, seven 16S rRNA genes, six 23S rRNA genes and five non-coding RNA genes (Table 1).
Table 1

.

S. NoNameGenome characteristics and Resources
1NCBI Bioproject IDPRJNA298672
2NCBI Biosample IDSAMN04230746
3NCBI Genome Accession NumberCP014165
4Sequence typeIllumina Miseq
5Total number of Reads3,841,334
6Read length150
7Overall coverage>100x
8Mapped reads90 %
9Estimated genome size3,745,118 bp
10GC content41.64%
11Protein coding genes3430
12tRNA coding genes70
13rRNA coding genes19
14ncRNA coding genes5
15Pseudogenes56
.

Direct link to deposited data and information to users

The dataset submitted to NCBI include the assembled consensus sequence of B. pumilus ku-bf1 in Fasta format and the Bam file generated by reference based assembly. The genome sequence can be accessed at NCBI using the accession number CP014165. Users can download and use the data freely for research purpose only with acknowledgment to us and quoting this paper as reference to the data.

Author contributions

Work was planned by KU and executed jointly by KU and JB. SR was associated with isolation of the bacterial strain.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  18 in total

Review 1.  The cellulosome and cellulose degradation by anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  W H Schwarz
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  The gut bacteria of insects: nonpathogenic interactions.

Authors:  R J Dillon; V M Dillon
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  [A plate method to screen for microorganisms producing xylose isomerase].

Authors:  L I Sapunova; A G Lobanok; I O Kazakevich; A N Evtushenkov
Journal:  Mikrobiologiia       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

Review 4.  How biotech can transform biofuels.

Authors:  Lee R Lynd; Mark S Laser; David Bransby; Bruce E Dale; Brian Davison; Richard Hamilton; Michael Himmel; Martin Keller; James D McMillan; John Sheehan; Charles E Wyman
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 5.  Challenges for the production of bioethanol from biomass using recombinant yeasts.

Authors:  William Kricka; James Fitzpatrick; Ursula Bond
Journal:  Adv Appl Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 5.086

6.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.

Authors:  Ben Langmead; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA.

Authors:  M G Murray; W F Thompson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1980-10-10       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Proteins for breaking barriers in lignocellulosic bioethanol production.

Authors:  Kandasamy Ulaganathan; Burragoni S Goud; Mettu M Reddy; Vanaparthi P Kumar; Jatoth Balsingh; Surabhi Radhakrishna
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.272

9.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools.

Authors:  Heng Li; Bob Handsaker; Alec Wysoker; Tim Fennell; Jue Ruan; Nils Homer; Gabor Marth; Goncalo Abecasis; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  BamView: viewing mapped read alignment data in the context of the reference sequence.

Authors:  Tim Carver; Ulrike Böhme; Thomas D Otto; Julian Parkhill; Matthew Berriman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  1 in total

1.  Draft Genome Sequence of Enterococcus mundtii SL 16, an Indigenous Gut Bacterium of the Polyphagous Pest Spodoptera littoralis.

Authors:  Bosheng Chen; Chao Sun; Xili Liang; Xingmeng Lu; Qikang Gao; Pol Alonso-Pernas; Beng-Soon Teh; Alexey L Novoselov; Wilhelm Boland; Yongqi Shao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 5.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.