Literature DB >> 274455

An analysis of three mixed dentition analyses.

R G Kaplan, C C Smith, P H Kanarek.   

Abstract

The accuracy of prediction of three mixed dentition analyses was compared. Hixon and Oldfather's method was found to be the most accurate. A simplified version of the analysis obviates referral to a table, allowing assessment of the size of the unerupted teeth prior to eruption of the lateral incisor.

Mesh：

Year:  1977        PMID： 274455     DOI： 10.1177/00220345770560110801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN： 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of two non-radiographic techniques of mixed dentition space analysis and evaluation of their reliability for Bengali population.

Authors:  Barun Dasgupta; Shabnam Zahir
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-09

2.  Reliability of permanent mandibular first molars and incisors widths as predictor for the width of permanent mandibular and maxillary canines and premolars.

Authors:  Madhulika Mittar; Vinay S Dua; Suvil Wilson
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-04

3.  Evaluation of mixed dentition analyses in north Indian population: A comparative study.

Authors:  Ravi Kumar Goyal; Vijay P Sharma; Pradeep Tandon; Amit Nagar; Gyan P Singh
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2014-10

4.  Applicability of Tanaka-Johnston, Moyers, and Bernabé and Flores-Mir Mixed Dentition Analyses in School-going Children of Sri Ganganagar City, Rajasthan (India): A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Ashish Kakkar; Kanika Gupta Verma; Purshottam Jusuja; Suruchi Juneja; Nishtha Arora; Shobhit Singh
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.