Literature DB >> 27445399

How to find home backwards? Navigation during rearward homing of Cataglyphis fortis desert ants.

Sarah E Pfeffer1, Matthias Wittlinger2.   

Abstract

Cataglyphis ants are renowned for their impressive navigation skills, which have been studied in numerous experiments during forward locomotion. However, the ants' navigational performance during backward homing when dragging large food loads has not been investigated until now. During backward locomotion, the odometer has to deal with unsteady motion and irregularities in inter-leg coordination. The legs' sensory feedback during backward walking is not just a simple reversal of the forward stepping movements: compared with forward homing, ants are facing towards the opposite direction during backward dragging. Hence, the compass system has to cope with a flipped celestial view (in terms of the polarization pattern and the position of the sun) and an inverted retinotopic image of the visual panorama and landmark environment. The same is true for wind and olfactory cues. In this study we analyze for the first time backward-homing ants and evaluate their navigational performance in channel and open field experiments. Backward-homing Cataglyphis fortis desert ants show remarkable similarities in the performance of homing compared with forward-walking ants. Despite the numerous challenges emerging for the navigational system during backward walking, we show that ants perform quite well in our experiments. Direction and distance gauging was comparable to that of the forward-walking control groups. Interestingly, we found that backward-homing ants often put down the food item and performed foodless search loops around the left food item. These search loops were mainly centred around the drop-off position (and not around the nest position), and increased in length the closer the ants came to their fictive nest site.
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Backward homing; Cataglyphis desert ants; Food dragging; Navigation; Search behaviour

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27445399     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.137786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  4 in total

1.  Opponent processes in visual memories: A model of attraction and repulsion in navigating insects' mushroom bodies.

Authors:  Florent Le Möel; Antoine Wystrach
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 2.  Multimodal interactions in insect navigation.

Authors:  Cornelia Buehlmann; Michael Mangan; Paul Graham
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  A dung beetle that path integrates without the use of landmarks.

Authors:  Marie Dacke; Basil El Jundi; Yakir Gagnon; Ayse Yilmaz; Marcus Byrne; Emily Baird
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 4.  How to Navigate in Different Environments and Situations: Lessons From Ants.

Authors:  Cody A Freas; Patrick Schultheiss
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.