Literature DB >> 27445278

Students' motivation toward laboratory work in physiology teaching.

Niels Bonderup Dohn1, Angela Fago2, Johannes Overgaard2, Peter Teglberg Madsen2, Hans Malte2.   

Abstract

The laboratory has been given a central role in physiology education, and teachers report that it is motivating for students to undertake experimental work on live animals or measuring physiological responses on the students themselves. Since motivation is a critical variable for academic learning and achievement, then we must concern ourselves with questions that examine how students engage in laboratory work and persist at such activities. The purpose of the present study was to investigate how laboratory work influences student motivation in physiology. We administered the Lab Motivation Scale to assess our students' levels of interest, willingness to engage (effort), and confidence in understanding (self-efficacy). We also asked students about the role of laboratory work for their own learning and their experience in the physiology laboratory. Our results documented high levels of interest, effort, and self-efficacy among the students. Correlation analyses were performed on the three motivation scales and exam results, yet a significant correlation was only found between self-efficacy in laboratory work and academic performance at the final exam. However, almost all students reported that laboratory work was very important for learning difficult concepts and physiological processes (e.g., action potential), as the hands-on experiences gave a more concrete idea of the learning content and made the content easier to remember. These results have implications for classroom practice as biology students find laboratory exercises highly motivating, despite their different personal interests and subject preferences. This highlights the importance of not replacing laboratory work by other nonpractical approaches, for example, video demonstrations or computer simulations.
Copyright © 2016 The American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  interest; laboratory work; motivation; self-determination theory; self-efficacy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27445278     DOI: 10.1152/advan.00029.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ        ISSN: 1043-4046            Impact factor:   2.288


  3 in total

1.  Development of low-cost cardiac and skeletal muscle laboratory activities to teach physiology concepts and the scientific method.

Authors:  Jennifer L Judge; Victor A Cazares; Zoe Thompson; Lynnda A Skidmore
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Facilitatory Effect of Extending the Course Duration on Dissemination of Educational Content.

Authors:  Hiromasa Satoh; Fuminobu Tamalu; Narumi Hirosawa; Hajime Hirasawa; Mitsuo Nagane; Ryohei Saito; Shu-Ichi Watanabe; Naofumi Miwa
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2022-05-07

3.  Sharing a Preliminary Experience of an Effective Online Teaching Strategy for Physiology Practicals.

Authors:  Anindita Mahanta; L Sundareswaran; Krishnan S; Abhishek Sinha; Naveen P; Manasi Bhattacharjee
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.