Literature DB >> 27445216

Impact of Replacing the Pooled Cohort Equation With Other Cardiovascular Disease Risk Scores on Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment (from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis [MESA]).

Waqas T Qureshi1, Erin D Michos2, Peter Flueckiger3, Michael Blaha2, Veit Sandfort4, David M Herrington3, Gregory Burke5, Joseph Yeboah3.   

Abstract

The increase in statin eligibility by the new cholesterol guidelines is mostly driven by the Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE) criterion (≥7.5% 10-year PCE). The impact of replacing the PCE with either the modified Framingham Risk Score (FRS) or the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) on assessment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk assessment and statin eligibility remains unknown. We assessed the comparative benefits of using the PCE, FRS, and SCORE for ASCVD risk assessment in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Of 6,815 participants, 654 (mean age 61.4 ± 10.3; 47.1% men; 37.1% whites; 27.2% blacks; 22.3% Hispanics; 12.0% Chinese-Americans) were included in analysis. Area under the curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis were used to compare the 3 risk scores. Decision curve analysis is the plot of net benefit versus probability thresholds; net benefit = true positive rate - (false positive rate × weighting factor). Weighting factor = Threshold probability/1 - threshold probability. After a median of 8.6 years, 342 (6.0%) ASCVD events (myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease death, fatal or nonfatal stroke) occurred. All 4 risk scores had acceptable discriminative ability for incident ASCVD events; (AUC [95% CI] PCE: 0.737 [0.713 to 0.762]; FRS: 0.717 [0.691 to 0.743], SCORE (high risk) 0.722 [0.696 to 0.747], and SCORE (low risk): 0.721 [0.696 to 0.746]. At the ASCVD risk threshold recommended for statin eligibility for primary prevention (≥7.5%), the PCE provides the best net benefit. Replacing the PCE with the SCORE (high), SCORE (low) and FRS results in a 2.9%, 8.9%, and 17.1% further increase in statin eligibility. The PCE has the best discrimination and net benefit for primary ASCVD risk assessment in a US-based multiethnic cohort compared with the SCORE or the FRS.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27445216     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Prognostic value of exercise capacity among patients with treated depression: The Henry Ford Exercise Testing (FIT) Project.

Authors:  Amjad M Ahmed; Waqas T Qureshi; Sherif Sakr; Michael J Blaha; Clinton A Brawner; Jonathan K Ehrman; Steven J Keteyian; Mouaz H Al-Mallah
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Predicting the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease among adults living with HIV/AIDS in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A hospital-based study.

Authors:  Minyahil Woldu; Omary Minzi; Workineh Shibeshi; Aster Shewaamare; Ephrem Engidawork
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Estimated Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Disparities and Severe COVID-19 Outcomes (from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative).

Authors:  Yousif A Arif; Alexa M Stefanko; Nicholas Garcia; David A Beshai; Wenjun Fan; Nathan D Wong
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  Association of Vascular Risk Scores and Cognitive Performance in a Diverse Cohort: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Christopher L Schaich; Joseph Yeboah; Mark A Espeland; Laura D Baker; Jingzhong Ding; Kathleen M Hayden; Bonnie C Sachs; Suzanne Craft; Stephen R Rapp; José A Luchsinger; Annette L Fitzpatrick; Susan R Heckbert; Wendy S Post; Gregory L Burke; Norrina B Allen; Timothy M Hughes
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 6.591

5.  Optimisation of lipids for prevention of cardiovascular disease in a primary care.

Authors:  Smita Bakhai; Aishwarya Bhardwaj; Parteet Sandhu; Jessica L Reynolds
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2018-08-13

6.  A cross-sectional validation study comparing the accuracy of different risk scores in assessing the risk of acute coronary syndrome among patients in a tertiary care hospital in Kerala.

Authors:  Gnanaguru Durairaj; Akash Thomas Oommen; M Gopalakrishna Pillai
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2020-04-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.