| Literature DB >> 27444612 |
Xue-Ping Wang1, Xiao-Hui Li1, Lin Zhang1,2, Jian-Hua Lin1, Hao Huang3, Ting Kang1, Min-Jie Mao1, Hao Chen4, Xin Zheng5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prognostic tools for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are urgently needed. Serum lipids and lipoproteins are used for the prognosis of certain diseases; however, the prognostic value of serum apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I) in ESCC has not been described.Entities:
Keywords: Apolipoprotein A-I; ESCC; Overall survival; Prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27444612 PMCID: PMC4957343 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2502-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
The levels of ApoA-I between the ESCC patients and healthy controls
| Characteristics | ESCC |
| Controls |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Numbers | Median (range) | Numbers | Median (range) | |||
| Age, years | 0.973 | 0.733 | ||||
| <58 | 102 | 1.21(0.83–1.64) | 105 | 1.56(0.8–2.32) | ||
| ≥58 | 108 | 1.21(0.71–2.05) | 114 | 1.59(1.23–2.11) | ||
| Sex | 0.084 | 0.887 | ||||
| Male | 150 | 1.16(0.71–2.05) | 137 | 1.56(0.8–2.24) | ||
| Female | 60 | 1.25(0.81–1.89) | 82 | 1.58(1.05–2.32) | ||
| pT status | 0.175 | |||||
| pT 1 | 17 | 1.15(0.95–1.39) | ||||
| pT 2 | 40 | 1.26(0.88–2.05) | ||||
| pT 3 | 128 | 1.20(0.71–1.84) | ||||
| pT 4 | 25 | 1.12(0.87–1.6) | ||||
| pN status | 0.094 | |||||
| pN 0 | 114 | 1.25(0.8–2.05) | ||||
| pN 1 | 96 | 1.16(0.71–1.8) | ||||
| pM status | 0.828 | |||||
| pM 0 | 197 | 1.21(0.71–2.05) | ||||
| pM 1 | 13 | 1.16(0.92–1.59) | ||||
| pTNM status | 0.226 | |||||
| Stage I | 15 | 1.15(1.03–1.39) | ||||
| Stage II | 103 | 1.25(0.8–2.05) | ||||
| Stage III | 80 | 1.15(0.71–1.8) | ||||
| Stage IV | 12 | 1.22(0.92–1.59) | ||||
| Histological differentiation | 0.393 | |||||
| DCIS | 3 | 1.61(1.12–1.67) | ||||
| Low | 66 | 1.22(0.8–1.89) | ||||
| Moderate | 98 | 1.19(0.71–2.05) | ||||
| Well | 43 | 1.17(0.81–1.6) | ||||
| Alcohol index | 0.815 | |||||
| Yes | 96 | 1.19(0.71–1.64) | ||||
| No | 114 | 1.21(0.8–2.05) | ||||
The levels of lipids between the ESCC patients and healthy controls
| ESCC | Normal |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | (range) | Median | (range) | ||
| ApoA-I(g/L) | 1.21 | 0.71–2.05 | 1.56 | 0.8–2.25 |
|
| ApoB(g/L) | 1.00 | 0.41–1.81 | 0.96 | 0.41–1.88 |
|
| HDL-C(mmol/L) | 1.20 | 0.39–2.34 | 1.40 | 0.68–2.47 |
|
| LDL-C(mmol/L) | 3.38 | 1.32–7.09 | 3.42 | 1.17–6.11 | 0.583 |
| TC(mmol/L) | 4.89 | 2.72–7.57 | 5.59 | 2.57–8.92 |
|
| TG(mmol/L) | 1.10 | 0.38–10.55 | 1.12 | 0.4–12.91 | 0.534 |
Bold values represent the P-value <0.05, which was considered to be statistically significant
Fig. 1Pre-therapy serum levels of lipids in ESCC patients and healthy controls. The serum HDL-C, TC, ApoA-I, ApoB levels in ESCC patients and healthy controls are plotted as a distribution (a, b, c, d)
Univariate and multivariate cox analysis for overall survival in patients with ESCC
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95 % CI |
| HR | 95 % CI |
| |
| Sex | ||||||
| Male vs. Female | 1.376 | 0.918–2.063 | 0.123 | |||
| Age | ||||||
| <58 vs. ≥58 | 1.008 | 0.712–1.428 | 0.965 | |||
| pT status | ||||||
| T1-2 vs. T3-4 | 0.453 | 0.288–0.712 | 0.001 | |||
| pN status | ||||||
| Yes vs. No | 0.416 | 0.292–0.594 | 0.000 | |||
| pM status | ||||||
| Yes vs. No | 0.401 | 0.220–0.729 | 0.003 | |||
| pTNM status | ||||||
| I–II vs. III–IV | 0.412 | 0.289–0.587 | 0.000 | 0.427 | 0.299–0.609 | 0.000 |
| Histological differentiation | ||||||
| Differentiated vs. Undifferentiated | 0.907 | 0.227–3.722 | 0.907 | |||
| Tobacco index | ||||||
| Yes vs. No | 0.762 | 0.528–1.101 | 0.147 | |||
| Alcohol index | ||||||
| Yes vs. No | 0.65 | 0.458–0.921 | 0.015 | 0.688 | 0.484–0.977 | 0.037 |
| ApoA-I (g/L) | ||||||
| <1.21 vs. ≥1.21 | 1.541 | 1.082–2.193 | 0.016 | 1.519 | 1.021–2.261 | 0.039 |
| ApoB(g/L) | ||||||
| <1.00 vs. ≥1.00 | 0.927 | 0.654–1.313 | 0.669 | |||
| HDL-C(mmol/L) | ||||||
| <1.20 vs. ≥1.20 | 0.993 | 0.701–1.407 | 0.968 | |||
| LDL-C(mmol/L) | ||||||
| <3.38 vs. ≥3.38 | 0.935 | 0.659–1.327 | 0.707 | |||
| TC(mmol/L) | ||||||
| <4.89 vs. ≥4.89 | 1.041 | 0.734–1.475 | 0.824 | |||
| TG(g/L) | ||||||
| <1.10 vs. ≥1.10 | 1.111 | 0.784–1.574 | 0.554 | |||
Fig. 2Analysis of 5-year overall survival in ESCC patients. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for overall survival of ESCC patients showing significantly poor survival with higher p TNM status (a), alcohol index (b) and lower ApoA-I (c)