| Literature DB >> 27443986 |
Qian Zhu1, Xiubin Sun1, Xiaokang Ji1, Lin Zhu1, Jing Xu1, Chunxia Wang2, Chengqi Zhang3, Fuzhong Xue1, Yanxun Liu1.
Abstract
The precise association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and gallstone disease remains unclear in China. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between MetS and gallstone and evaluate whether counts of metabolic abnormalities had influence on gallstone disease. We fitted gender-specific generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression models with data from a large-scale longitudinal study over 6-year follow-up to elucidate the real association. This study included 18291 participants with 3 times repeated measures at least who were free from a prior history of gallstone disease and cholecystectomy. A total of 873 cases of gallstones occurred during 6-year follow-up. The incidence density of gallstone in the group of subjects with MetS was higher than the group without MetS (10.27 vs 5.79). The GEE analyses confirmed and clarified the association between MetS and gallstone disease in males (RR = 1.33, P = 0.0020), while this association was not significant in females (RR = 1.15, P = 0.4962). With numbers of metabolic syndrome components increasing, the risk of gallstone disease showed corresponding increasing in males. In conclusion, the associations of MetS and gallstone are different in males and in females. And the risk of gallstone disease increases with the number of components of MetS for males but not for females.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27443986 PMCID: PMC4957232 DOI: 10.1038/srep29937
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Distribution of associated factors and components of MetS for gallstone events of participants grouped by MetS status at baseline.
| non-Mets | Mets | Chiq | P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | |||
| Age at baseline | 864.98 | <0.0001 | ||||
| ≤24 | 721 | 95.62 | 33 | 4.38 | ||
| 25–44 | 9128 | 91.13 | 888 | 8.87 | ||
| 45–64 | 4425 | 78.68 | 1199 | 21.32 | ||
| ≥65 | 1338 | 70.53 | 559 | 29.47 | ||
| Gender | 864.98 | <0.0001 | ||||
| male | 9365 | 80.66 | 2246 | 19.34 | ||
| female | 6247 | 93.52 | 433 | 6.48 | ||
| Obesity | 3148.59 | <0.0001 | ||||
| No | 9691 | 99.03 | 95 | 0.97 | ||
| Yes | 5921 | 69.62 | 2584 | 30.38 | ||
| Hypertension | 6005.73 | <0.0001 | ||||
| No | 13132 | 97.47 | 341 | 2.53 | ||
| Yes | 2480 | 51.47 | 2338 | 48.53 | ||
| DM | 3789.73 | <0.0001 | ||||
| No | 14891 | 90.83 | 1504 | 9.17 | ||
| Yes | 721 | 38.03 | 1175 | 61.97 | ||
| Dyslipidemia | 3135.99 | <0.0001 | ||||
| No | 10535 | 97.55 | 265 | 2.45 | ||
| Yes | 5077 | 67.77 | 2414 | 32.23 | ||
DM = diabetes mellitus.
Event rates of gallstones in 6 year follow-up grouped by MetS status at baseline.
| MetS status | N (%) | Gallstone events% | Person-year observation | Event rate (per 1000 person-year) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | MetS | 2679(14.65) | 209(7.80) | 20346 | 10.27 |
| non-MetS | 15612(85.35) | 664(4.25) | 114626 | 5.79 | |
| Male | MetS | 2246(19.36) | 175(7.79) | 17000 | 10.29 |
| non-MetS | 9365(80.66) | 429(4.58) | 68385 | 6.27 | |
| Female | MetS | 433(6.48) | 34(7.85) | 3346 | 10.16 |
| non-MetS | 6247(93.52) | 235(3.76) | 46241 | 5.08 |
Figure 1Modeled cumulative incidence of gallstone disease from age 18 to 82, stratified by sex and MetS status.
The curves were modeled by real cumulative incidence of gallstone disease. Curves of cumulative incidence of gallstone disease among persons with MetS are in red; curves of cumulative incidence of gallstone disease among persons without MetS are in blue.
Results of GEE analysis for gallstone disease and MetS.
| Age-adjusted | Multi-GEE | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR | lower 95% CI | higher 95% CI | P Value | RR | lower 95% CI | higher 95% CI | P Value | |
| All | 1.32 | 1.12 | 1.55 | 0.0011* | 1.25 | 1.06 | 1.49 | 0.0097* |
| Male | 1.33 | 1.11 | 1.59 | 0.0020* | 1.36 | 1.13 | 1.63 | 0.0011* |
| Female | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.71 | 0.4962 | 0.84 | 0.56 | 1.26 | 0.4117 |
The association between MetS and gallstones was assessed by age-adjusted GEE analysis with the baseline age for all participants.
The association between MetS and gallstones was assessed by multiple GEE analysis with age, gender, ALT, GGT, STP, ALB, GLO, BUN, CREA, MCHC, LYM, neutrophil percentage, basophil percentage and diet history adjustment for all participants.
The association between MetS and gallstones was assessed by multiple GEE analysis with age, ALT, STP, ALB, GLO, CREA, MCHC, basophil percentage and diet history adjustment for male.
The association between MetS and gallstones was assessed by multiple GEE analysis with age, ALT, GGT, STP, ALB, GLO, BUN, MCHC, basophil percentage and diet history adjustment for female.
CI = Confidence interval; RR = the relative risk; *p < 0.05.
The association between the count of metabolic disorders and gallstone events.
| Total | Male | Female | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number (yes/total) | Prevalence | RR (95% CI) | P value | Number (yes/total) | Prevalence | RR (95% CI) | P value | Number (yes/total) | Prevalence | RR (95% CI) | P value | |
| Number of metabolic components | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | >0.05 | |||||||||
| 0 | 174/5779 | 3.01 | 1 | 73/2352 | 3.1 | 1 | 101/3427 | 2.95 | 1 | |||
| 1 | 229/5467 | 4.19 | 1.26 (1.04, 1.53) | 155/3437 | 4.51 | 1.45 (1.12, 1.88) | 74/2030 | 3.65 | 0.97 (0.72, 1.31) | |||
| 2 | 261/4366 | 5.93 | 1.47 (1.20, 1.79) | 201/3576 | 5.62 | 1.5 (1.15, 1.95) | 60/790 | 7.59 | 1.43 (0.97, 2.10) | |||
| 3 | 173/2205 | 7.85 | 1.5 (1.19, 1.89) | 144/1858 | 7.75 | 1.62 (1.21, 2.16) | 29/347 | 8.36 | 1.27 (0.78, 2.06) | |||
| 4 | 36/474 | 7.59 | 2.6 (1.94, 3.50) | 31/388 | 7.99 | 2.87 (2.01, 4.09) | 5/86 | 5.81 | 1.69 (0.84, 3.41) | |||
CI = Confidence interval; RR = the relative risk.
Figure 2The distribution of participants for each repeated surveys at each year.
The participants had their first survey and entered our cohort in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, separately. The total number of participants was 18291. The 1st survey represented the total number of participants to be involved in the subsequent surveys of the different years. The 2nd survey represented the number of participants who had their second survey in each subsequent year. Similarly, the 3rd survey, the 4th survey, the 5th survey and 6th survey separately represented the number of participants who had their third survey, fourth survey, fifth survey and sixth survey. 18291 participants took the 1st survey and at least two of 2nd–6th surveys.