Tobias Terbonssen1, Utz Settmacher2, Christine Wurst2, Olaf Dirsch3, Uta Dahmen4. 1. Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Experimental Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Drackendorfer Str. 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. 2. Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany. 3. Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Institute for pathology, Flemmingstrasse 2, 09116, Chemnitz, Germany. 4. Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Experimental Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Drackendorfer Str. 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. uta.dahmen@med.uni-jena.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: It is well known that personal decision making in respect to organ donation is highly dependent on the balance of knowledge, trust, and fear. We wanted to explore the attitude of German medical students towards organ donation and investigate the relationship between knowledge, trust, and fear in this special subgroup. METHODS: We conducted an online survey utilizing (1) the snowball effect of using Facebook groups and advertisement as well as (2) mailing lists of medical faculties in Germany for distribution. RESULTS: We surveyed 1370 medical students. 75.8 % (N = 988) of the participants stated to carry an organ donor card and allowed their organs to be donated. 1.8 % (N = 23) refused donation. 22.5 % (N = 293) did not carry an organ donor card. Analysis of the "decided" versus the "undecided" group revealed substantial differences regarding transplantation knowledge (mean knowledge score of 4.23 vs. 3.81; P < 0.001), trust in (mean trust score 4.11 vs. 3.39; P < 0.001), and fear of (mean fear score 1.63 vs. 2.22; P < 0.001) organ donation. 45.9 % of the undecided group (N = 134) opted for accessing additional information material. After reading the info material, 22.7 % (N = 29) stated their willingness to sign a donor card, whereas 76.6 % (N = 98) still could not reach a decision. CONCLUSIONS: The willingness to potentially act as organ donor was related to the pre-existent knowledge, trust, and fear. Access to information material did promote the decision towards organ donation in a group of previously undecided medical students. This advocates initiating information campaigns even in population groups with strong medical background.
PURPOSE: It is well known that personal decision making in respect to organ donation is highly dependent on the balance of knowledge, trust, and fear. We wanted to explore the attitude of German medical students towards organ donation and investigate the relationship between knowledge, trust, and fear in this special subgroup. METHODS: We conducted an online survey utilizing (1) the snowball effect of using Facebook groups and advertisement as well as (2) mailing lists of medical faculties in Germany for distribution. RESULTS: We surveyed 1370 medical students. 75.8 % (N = 988) of the participants stated to carry an organ donor card and allowed their organs to be donated. 1.8 % (N = 23) refused donation. 22.5 % (N = 293) did not carry an organ donor card. Analysis of the "decided" versus the "undecided" group revealed substantial differences regarding transplantation knowledge (mean knowledge score of 4.23 vs. 3.81; P < 0.001), trust in (mean trust score 4.11 vs. 3.39; P < 0.001), and fear of (mean fear score 1.63 vs. 2.22; P < 0.001) organ donation. 45.9 % of the undecided group (N = 134) opted for accessing additional information material. After reading the info material, 22.7 % (N = 29) stated their willingness to sign a donor card, whereas 76.6 % (N = 98) still could not reach a decision. CONCLUSIONS: The willingness to potentially act as organ donor was related to the pre-existent knowledge, trust, and fear. Access to information material did promote the decision towards organ donation in a group of previously undecided medical students. This advocates initiating information campaigns even in population groups with strong medical background.
Entities:
Keywords:
Fear; Germany; Knowledge; Medical students; Organ donation; Trust
Authors: Sonia Radunz; Benjamin Juntermanns; Matthias Heuer; Nils R Frühauf; Andreas Paul; Gernot M Kaiser Journal: Ann Transplant Date: 2012 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 1.530
Authors: Constantin E Uhlig; Daniel Böhringer; Gerrit Hirschfeld; Berthold Seitz; Hartmut Schmidt Journal: Ann Transplant Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 1.530
Authors: Yeshe Fenner; Suzanne M Garland; Elya E Moore; Yasmin Jayasinghe; Ashley Fletcher; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Bharathy Gunasekaran; John D Wark Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Emmanouil K Symvoulakis; George Rachiotis; Dimitrios Papagiannis; Adelais Markaki; Yiannis Dimitroglou; Myfanwy Morgan; Christos Hadjichristodoulou; Roger Jones Journal: Int J Med Sci Date: 2014-04-25 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Matthias Heuer; Sonia Radunz; Friederike von Hugo; Carmen Kirchner; Natalie Wittenburg; Karl-Heinz Stammen; Andreas Paul; Gernot Kaiser Journal: Eur J Med Res Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 2.175