| Literature DB >> 27443559 |
Francesca D'Avila1,2, Mirella Meregalli3,4, Sara Lupoli1,2, Matteo Barcella1,2, Alessandro Orro5, Francesca De Santis3, Clementina Sitzia3, Andrea Farini3, Pasqualina D'Ursi5, Silvia Erratico4, Riccardo Cristofani6, Luciano Milanesi5, Daniele Braga1,2, Daniele Cusi1,2, Angelo Poletti6, Cristina Barlassina7,8,9, Yvan Torrente10,11.
Abstract
Myofibrillar myopathies (MFMs) are genetically heterogeneous dystrophies characterized by the disintegration of Z-disks and myofibrils and are associated with mutations in genes encoding Z-disk or Z-disk-related proteins. The c.626 C > T (p.P209L) mutation in the BAG3 gene has been described as causative of a subtype of MFM. We report a sporadic case of a 26-year-old Italian woman, affected by MFM with axonal neuropathy, cardiomyopathy, rigid spine, who carries the c.626 C > T mutation in the BAG3 gene. The patient and her non-consanguineous healthy parents and brother were studied with whole exome sequencing (WES) to further investigate the genetic basis of this complex phenotype. In the patient, we found that the BAG3 mutation is associated with variants in the NRAP and FHL1 genes that encode muscle-specific, LIM domain containing proteins. Quantitative real time PCR, immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis of the patient's muscular biopsy showed the absence of NRAP expression and FHL1 accumulation in aggregates in the affected skeletal muscle tissue. Molecular dynamic analysis of the mutated FHL1 domain showed a modification in its surface charge, which could affect its capability to bind its target proteins. To our knowledge this is the first study reporting, in a BAG3 MFM, the simultaneous presence of genetic variants in the BAG3 and FHL1 genes (previously described as independently associated with MFMs) and linking the NRAP gene to MFM for the first time.Entities:
Keywords: BAG3; Exome sequencing; LIM proteins; Myofibrillar myopathies
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27443559 PMCID: PMC5010835 DOI: 10.1007/s10974-016-9451-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Muscle Res Cell Motil ISSN: 0142-4319 Impact factor: 2.698
Primer sequences (5′–3′) used for variant validation
| Gene | Variation | Validation technique | Forward PCR primer sequence | Reverse PCR primer sequence | Sequencing primer sequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NRAP | rs200747403 | Pyrosequencing | TCCCCACTCATTCAAGTACACA | GCACTTGGAAAGCAAGACTACA | TTATCTGGTTGCTGAATT |
| NRAP | rs2270182 | Pyrosequencing | AAGTACAGGCTGCCTTGTAAAATG | TCCCCACATTGCTCTCTTACCT | CCGTGCTGACTATGAGAA |
| NRAP | rs2275799 | Pyirosequencing | CTGTGCATGGGAGTCAAATTCA | TATTGGTCTGCACATTCCCTTGTC | TCAAGATGCCCTCAG |
| FHL1 | rs151315725 | Sanger Sequencing | GTTTCCTCACCTGTATTCATTCAGC | AAATGGGAGAAAAGACGGAAGGAGAAC | GAGAAAAGACGGAAGGAGAAC |
Primer sequences (5′–3′) used in qPCR analysis
| Gene | Forward primer sequence | Reverse primer sequence |
|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | GTGGCAAAGTGGAGATTGTTGCC | GTAGATGACCCGTTTGGCTCC |
| BAG3 | GCTCCGACCAGGCTACATT | GATAGACATGGAAAGGGTGC |
| NRAP | GCTGCAGAGTGATGTCAAGTAT | CCGAGCCATTTCCACTTTGTA |
| FHL1 | AAAGGACTGTGTCAAGAGTGAG | AAACAGGGTGAGAGGCAAG |
Fig. 1Family pedigree. The patient is marked with an arrow and is indicated with a filled circle. The unaffected relatives are marked with open circle/square
Fig. 2Immunohistochemistry analysis on the patient’s muscle biopsy. a, a’ Histological characterization of the patient’s muscle tissue by Hematoxylin & Eosin. b, b’ Acid phosphatase activity showed many cytoplasmic inclusions. c, c’ Cytoplasmic glycolytic bodies were visualized by αGPD enzyme. Sections were stained for COX (d, d’) NADH (e, e’), SDH (h, h’), showing the presence of amorphous deposits. Fast (f, f’) and slow (g, g’) myofiber staining was performed. Gomori’s trichrome (i, i’) and Oil Red O (j, j’) staining. Note the variability in fiber areas, collagen and oil droplets deposition
Fig. 3Analysis of BAG3 expression, content and localization in the patient’s muscle biopsy. a RT-qPCR analysis of BAG3 mRNA revealed a non-statistically significant downregulation of BAG3 expression in the patient’s muscle compared with healthy controls. b WB analysis of BAG3 performed on the patient’s and control muscles showed a downregulation of BAG3 expression in the patient’s muscle. Images of bands were obtained using the CanoScan LiDE60 Scanner (Canon) and the Canon ScanGear Software. c Densitometric analysis of the protein levels was performed using ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). d Immunohistochemical analysis of BAG3 in the patient’s and control muscles. In the controls BAG3 localized with sarcolemma, while in the patient it accumulated in the cytoplasm of some muscle fibers
Fig. 4Analysis of NRAP and FHL1 expression, content and localization in the patient’s muscle biopsy. a RT-qPCR analysis showed a statistically significant downregulation of NRAP expression in the patient’s muscle compared with healthy controls (unpaired t test, p < 0.05). b WB analysis of NRAP in the patient’s and control muscle. The analysis showed the absence of NRAP expression in the patient. c Densitometric analysis of the protein levels was performed using ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). d RT-qPCR analysis showed a non-statistically significant downregulation of FHL1 in the patient’s muscle compared to healthy controls. e WB analysis revealed an overexpression of FHL1 in the patient’s muscle compared to the healthy controls. f Densitometric analysis of the protein levels was performed using ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). g Immunohistochemical analysis of NRAP was performed on the patient’s and control muscles. In the control NRAP localized with myofibrils, while in the patient it was not detectable. Immunohistochemical analysis of FHL1 demonstrated an intracytoplasmatic myofiber association of the protein in the controls while in the patient it was detectable in intracytoplasmatic aggregates
Fig. 5Molecular dynamics simulation and electrostatic potential study of FHL1 fourth LIM domain. a Structure of fourth LIM domain from MD simulation of wild-type FHL1 and the D275N FHL1 mutant. Each structure was the most representative frame obtained from the cluster analysis of the simulations. A ribbon representation of the wild-type protein is shown in green with the mutant structure superimposed in cyan. Asp275, Asn275 mutant and the zinc ion coordination residues are shown in rod and colored by atom type, while the zinc ions are shown in space-filling (van der Waals) representations. The D275N mutant remained folded in native conformation, with zinc sites almost fully intact. b Surface electrostatic potential distribution of D275N mutant compared to the wild type LIM domain. Green circles indicate the position of Asp275 and Asn275 in wild type and mutant, respectively. The potential scale ranges from −1 kT/e to 1 kT/e from red to blue
Fig. 6In vitro evaluation of NRAP and FHL1 expression after transfection with wild type and mutated BAG3. a Evaluation of the expression of BAG3, NRAP and FHL1 expression in CHQRb cells before and after transfection with wild-type pCIneoHisBag3 (BAG3) and mutated pCIneoHisBag3 c626C > T (BAG3*) by WB analysis. b Densitometric analysis of BAG3, NRAP and FHL1 levels in CHQRb cells performed using ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). c WB analysis for BAG3, NRAP and FHL1 expression in patient’s myoblasts before and after transfection with wild-type pCIneoHisBag3 (BAG3). d Densitometric analysis of BAG3, NRAP and FHL1 levels in patient’s myoblasts performed using ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). e–h Evaluation of the expression of FHL1 in patient’s myoblasts before (e) and after (f) transfection with wild type pCIneoHisBag3 (BAG3) and in normal myoblasts treated with wild type (g) and mutated (h) BAG3 by immunofluorescence analysis. Images were captured using the Leica TCS SP2 confocal system (Leica, Germany), ×20 magnification, scale bar 100 μm