Literature DB >> 27442794

Mass Casualty Decontamination in the United States: An Online Survey of Current Practice.

Sarah Power, Charles Symons, Holly Carter, Emma Jones, Richard Amlôt, Joanne Larner, Hazem Matar, Robert P Chilcott.   

Abstract

Mass casualty decontamination is a public health intervention that would be employed by emergency responders following a chemical, biological, or radiological incident. The decontamination of large numbers of casualties is currently most often performed with water to remove contaminants from the skin surface. An online survey was conducted to explore US fire departments' decontamination practices and their preparedness for responding to incidents involving mass casualty decontamination. Survey respondents were asked to provide details of various aspects of their decontamination procedures, including expected response times to reach casualties, disrobing procedures, approaches to decontamination, characteristics of the decontamination showering process, provision for special populations, and any actions taken following decontamination. The aim of the survey was to identify any differences in the way in which decontamination guidance is implemented across US states. Results revealed that, in line with current guidance, many US fire departments routinely use the "ladder-pipe system" for conducting rapid, gross decontamination of casualties. The survey revealed significant variability in ladder-pipe construction, such as the position and number of fire hoses used. There was also variability in decontamination characteristics, such as water temperature and water pressure, detergent use, and shower duration. The results presented here provide important insights into the ways in which implementation of decontamination guidance can vary between US states. These inconsistencies are thought to reflect established perceived best practices and local adaptation of response plans to address practical and logistical constraints. These outcomes highlight the need for evidence-based national guidelines for conducting mass casualty decontamination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27442794      PMCID: PMC4976249          DOI: 10.1089/hs.2016.0047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Secur        ISSN: 2326-5094


  8 in total

Review 1.  Decontamination.

Authors:  Marc Houston; Robert G Hendrickson
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 2.  The national incident management system: a multi-agency approach to emergency response in the United States of America.

Authors:  J F Annelli
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.181

Review 3.  Managing mass casualties and decontamination.

Authors:  Robert P Chilcott
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Comparative analysis of showering protocols for mass-casualty decontamination.

Authors:  Richard Amlot; Joanne Larner; Hazem Matar; David R Jones; Holly Carter; Elizabeth A Turner; Shirley C Price; Robert P Chilcott
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.040

5.  In vivo percutaneous absorption and skin decontamination of alachlor in rhesus monkey.

Authors:  R C Wester; J Melendres; H I Maibach
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1992-05

6.  Public experiences of mass casualty decontamination.

Authors:  Holly Carter; John Drury; G James Rubin; Richard Williams; Richard Amlôt
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2012-07-23

7.  Terrorism in Australia: factors associated with perceived threat and incident-critical behaviours.

Authors:  Garry Stevens; Kingsley Agho; Melanie Taylor; Margo Barr; Beverley Raphael; Louisa Jorm
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Effective responder communication improves efficiency and psychological outcomes in a mass decontamination field experiment: implications for public behaviour in the event of a chemical incident.

Authors:  Holly Carter; John Drury; Richard Amlôt; G James Rubin; Richard Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Mass Casualty Decontamination for Chemical Incidents: Research Outcomes and Future Priorities.

Authors:  Samuel Collins; Thomas James; Holly Carter; Charles Symons; Felicity Southworth; Kerry Foxall; Tim Marczylo; Richard Amlôt
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.