Literature DB >> 27442786

"I Broke My Ankle": Access to Orthopedic Follow-up Care by Insurance Status.

Laura N Medford-Davis1, Fred Lin1, Alexandra Greenstein2, Karin V Rhodes3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: While the Affordable Care Act seeks to reduce emergency department (ED) visits for outpatient-treatable conditions, it remains unclear whether Medicaid patients or the uninsured have adequate access to follow-up care. The goal of this study was to determine the availability of follow-up orthopedic care by insurance status.
METHODS: Using simulated patient methodology, all 102 eligible general orthopedic practices in Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, were contacted twice by a caller requesting follow-up for an ankle fracture diagnosed in a local ED using a standardized script that differed by insurance status. Practices were randomly assigned to paired private and uninsured or Medicaid and uninsured scenarios.
RESULTS: We completed 204 calls: 59 private, 43 Medicaid, and 102 uninsured. Appointment success rate was 83.1% for privately insured (95% confidence interval [CI] = 73.2% to 92.9%), 81.4% for uninsured (95% CI = 73.7% to 89.1%), and 14.0% for Medicaid callers (95% CI = 3.2% to 24.7%). Controlling for paired calls to the same practice, an uninsured caller had 5.7 times higher odds (95% CI = 2.74 to 11.71) of receiving an appointment than a Medicaid caller (p < 0.001), but the same odds as a privately insured caller (odds ratio = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.19 to 5.37, p = 1.0). Uninsured patients had to bring a median of $350 (interquartile range = $250 to $400) to their appointment to be seen, and only two uninsured patients were able to obtain an appointment for $100 or less up front. In comparison, typical total payments collected for privately insured patients were $236 and for Medicaid patients $128. When asked where else they could go, 49 (48%) uninsured callers and one Medicaid caller (2%) were directed to local public hospital EDs as alternative sources of care. Of the practices that appeared on Medicaid's published list of orthopedic providers accepting new patients, 15 told callers that they did not accept Medicaid, 11 did not treat ankles, nine listed nonworking phone numbers, and only three actually scheduled an appointment for the Medicaid caller.
CONCLUSIONS: Less than one in seven Medicaid patients could obtain orthopedic follow-up after an ED visit for a fracture, and prices quoted to the uninsured were 30% higher than typical negotiated rates paid by the privately insured. High up-front costs for uninsured patients and low appointment availability for Medicaid patients may leave these patients with no other option than the ED for necessary care.
© 2016 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27442786     DOI: 10.1111/acem.13058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  7 in total

1.  Is Insurance Status Associated with the Likelihood of Operative Treatment of Clavicle Fractures?

Authors:  Dominick V Congiusta; Kamil M Amer; Aziz M Merchant; Michael M Vosbikian; Irfan H Ahmed
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Not the Last Word: JoeCare: Free Health Insurance Coverage for All.

Authors:  Joseph Bernstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Access to Primary, Mental Health, and Specialty Care: a Comparison of Medicaid and Commercially Insured Populations in Oregon.

Authors:  K John McConnell; Christina J Charlesworth; Jane M Zhu; Thomas H A Meath; Rani M George; Melinda M Davis; Somnath Saha; Hyunjee Kim
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Inpatient Versus Outpatient Treatment of Gartland Type II Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: A Cost and Safety Comparison.

Authors:  Christopher A Makarewich; Alan K Stotts; Minkyoung Yoo; Richard E Nelson; David L Rothberg
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Increased Total Cost and Lack of Diagnostic Utility for Emergency Department Visits After ACL Injury.

Authors:  Lambert T Li; Carlin Chuck; Steven L Bokshan; Brett D Owens
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-12

6.  Definitive surgical femur fracture fixation in Northern Tanzania: implications of cost, payment method and payment status.

Authors:  Praveen Paul Rajaguru; Honest Massawe; Mubashir Jusabani; Rogers Temu; Neil Perry Sheth
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-06-15

7.  Is Insurance Status Associated With Likelihood of Operative ACL Injury Treatment Compared With Nonoperative Treatment?

Authors:  Katie Otero; Dominick Congiusta; Balazs Galdi
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-03-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.