| Literature DB >> 27441282 |
Satoru Arata1, Jun Watanabe2, Masako Maeda3, Masato Yamamoto3, Hideto Matsuhashi4, Mamiko Mochizuki4, Nobuyuki Kagami4, Kazuho Honda5, Masahiro Inagaki3.
Abstract
AIMS: Cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide; therefore, effective measures for cancer prevention and treatment are in constant demand. The extracts of Inonotus obliquus (Chaga mushroom) demonstrate potent anti-tumor activities and have been used to treat cancer in several countries; however, the actual effect and underlying mechanisms are still unclear. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the effects of continuous intake of aqueous extract from I. obliquus on tumor suppression. MAINEntities:
Keywords: Biochemistry; Biological sciences
Year: 2016 PMID: 27441282 PMCID: PMC4946216 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 5The intake of the I. obliquus extract agglomerated tumor cells in the mouse model of spontaneous metastasis. Mice drinking water with or without the I. obliquus aqueous extract received intravenous injection of 3LL cells. Representative HE-stained images of lung sections 2 weeks after cancer cell injection are shown.
Fig. 1The intake of the I. obliquus extract promoted body weight loss in middle-aged mice. Middle-aged and mature adult mice received water without (control) or with the I. obliquus extract for the indicated times and were analyzed for body weight. (A) Body weight of middle-aged mice (weight at day 0: 37.3 ± 3.5 g and 37.9 ± 5.1 g for the water and I. obliquus group, respectively; n = 4–5). (B) Amount of water drunk by middle-aged mice. (C) Body weight of mature adult mice (weight at day 0: 22.7 ± 1.8 g and 23.3 ± 2.1 g for the water and I. obliquus group, respectively; n = 8–9). (D) Amount of water drunk by mature adult mice. The data were normalized to the body weight at day 0 and expressed as the mean ± SD; *P < 0.05.
Fig. 2The intake of the I. obliquus extract suppressed tumor development in mice implanted Lewis lung carcinoma cells. Mice drinking water with or without the I. obliquus aqueous extract were injected 3LL cells subcutaneously in the right flanks and analyzed for tumor size. (A) Representative images of carcinomas. (B) Quantification of tumor size at the indicated times after 3LL cell implantation. (C) The weight of solid tumors at day 16 after 3LL cell implantation. Each dot represents a single mouse and lines show mean values (n = 8 per group; *P < 0.05).
Fig. 3I. obliquus extract caused tumor agglomeration and suppressed vascularization. 3LL cells were injected subcutaneously at the left abdomen of mice drinking water with or without the I. obliquus aqueous and tumors were analyzed by histology 7 days after cells implantation. (A) HE staining. (B) Immunostaining for CD31.
Fig. 4I. obliquus extract suppressed metastasis in mice injected with Lewis lung carcinoma cells. Mice drinking water with or without the I. obliquus aqueous extract received intravenous injection of 3LL cells. (A) Representative stereomicroscopic images of fixed mouse lungs containing carcinoma nodules. Arrowheads mark 3LL nodules on the lung. (B) The number of metastatic nodules counted under a stereomicroscope. Each dot represents a single mouse and lines show mean values (n = 4–6 per group). (C) Representative CT images of mouse lungs containing carcinoma nodules. Arrowheads mark 3LL nodules visible as dents on the lung. (D) The number of nodules measured in CT images of the lungs extracted at day 9 after cancer cell injection. Each dot represents a single mouse and lines show mean values (n = 4–5 per group; *P < 0.05).
Fig. 6Continuous intake of the I. obliquus extract prevented body temperature decrease in mice implanted Lewis lung carcinoma cells. (A) Average body temperature of mice measured from week 2 to 3 after the intake of drinking water without or with the aqueous extract of I. obliquus. (B, C) Average body temperature of mice receiving water (B) or I. obliquus extract (C) measured 1 week before (0 week), and 1 week and 2 weeks after cancer cell injection. The data are expressed as the mean (n = 3 per group); *P < 0.05 versus water (A) or 0 week (B, C).