| Literature DB >> 27441254 |
Maurizio Zotti1, Laura Del Coco1, Sandra Angelica De Pascali1, Danilo Migoni1, Salvatrice Vizzini2, Giorgio Mancinelli1, Francesco Paolo Fanizzi1.
Abstract
The proximate composition and element contents of claw muscle tissue of Atlantic blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) were compared with the native warty crab (Eriphia verrucosa) and the commercially edible crab (Cancer pagurus). The scope of the analysis was to profile the chemical characteristics and nutritive value of the three crab species. Elemental fingerprints showed significant inter-specific differences, whereas non-significant variations in the moisture and ash contents were observed. In the blue crab, protein content was significantly lower than in the other two species, while its carbon content resulted lower than that characterizing only the warty crab. Among micro-elements, Ba, Cr, Cu, Li, Mn, Ni, and Pb showed extremely low concentrations and negligible among-species differences. Significant inter-specific differences were observed for Na, Sr, V, Ba, Cd and Zn; in particular, cadmium and zinc were characterized in the blue crab by concentrations significantly lower than in the other two species. The analysis of the available literature on the three species indicated a general lack of comparable information on their elemental composition. The need to implement extended elemental fingerprinting techniques for shellfish quality assessment is discussed, in view of other complementary profiling methods such as NMR-based metabolomics.Entities:
Keywords: Food analysis; Food chemistry; Food constituents; Food science
Year: 2016 PMID: 27441254 PMCID: PMC4945894 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Biometric data, proximate composition and mineral elements of claw muscle tissues of the three crab species under analysis. Means, SE in brackets (n = 6); if < 0.005, SE are not shown. Macro- and microelements are expressed as g 100 g−1 wet weight. Among macro-elements, the C:N ratio is included. Results of 1-way ANOVAs (fixed factor = species) followed by post-hoc bivariate comparisons (Tukey HSD test) are reported. Abbreviations: Cs = Callinectes sapidus; Ev = Eriphia verrucosa; Cp = Cancer pagurus.
| F2,15 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biometric | Wet weight (g) | 173.00 (26.78) | 118.98 (23.35) | 615.69 (38.72) | ||
| Carapace width (mm) | 136.00 (7.58) | 64.00 (4.06) | 151.50 (1.50) | |||
| Proximate composition | Moisture (%) | 80.12 (1.90) | 78.03 (3.63) | 77.96 (4.64) | 0.12 | |
| Ash (%) | 1.63 (0.20) | 1.81 (0.12) | 2.25 (0.29) | 2.15 | ||
| Protein (%) | 15.13 (0.32) | 18.13 (0.49) | 17.02 (0.77) | 7.32 | Ev = Cp > Cs | |
| Macro-elements | C | 7.36 (0.15) | 9.38 (0.28) | 8.37 (0.20) | 23.01 | Ev = Cp > Cs |
| C:N | 3.04 (0.04) | 3.24 (0.11) | 3.14 (0.05) | 1.73 | ||
| Ca | 119.66 (67.43) | 456.76 (89.68) | 128.61 (29.50) | 8.23 | Ev > Cp = Cs | |
| K | 302.06 (8.74) | 278.43 (7.10) | 388.19 (33.30) | 8.10 | Cp > Ev = Cs | |
| Fe | 0.30 (0.07) | 0.46 (0.09) | 0.57 (0.15) | 1.63 | ||
| Mg | 35.86 (1.59) | 66.40 (5.10) | 42.03 (2.40) | 22.83 | Ev > Cp = Cs | |
| Na | 188.34 (8.55) | 325.90 (8.09) | 212.05 (30.09) | 15.54 | Ev > Cp = Cs | |
| Micro-elements | B | 0.06 (0.02) | 0.11 (0.01) | 0.05 | 4.63 | Cs = Ev > Cp |
| Ba | 0.02 (0.01) | 0.04 (0.01) | 0.14 (0.13) | 0.74 | ||
| Cd | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 28.24 | Ev = Cp > Cs | |
| Cr | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 3.30 | ||
| Cu | 0.90 (0.26) | 1.33 (0.29) | 0.71 (0.03) | 2.04 | ||
| Li | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 (0.01) | 1.31 | ||
| Mn | 0.03 (0.01) | 0.10 (0.04) | 0.03 | 3.11 | ||
| Ni | 0.02 (0.01) | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.62 | ||
| Pb | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.69 | ||
| Sr | 1.30 (1.10) | 5.92 (1.39) | 0.85 (0.41) | 7.16 | Ev > Cp = Cs | |
| V | 0.07 | 0.12 (0.01) | 0.06 | 29.58 | Ev > Cp = Cs | |
| Zn | 4.76 (0.96) | 9.40 (0.27) | 7.45 (1.41) | 5.49 | Ev = Cp > Cs | |
P < 0.05.
P < 0.01.
P < 0.0001.
Proximate composition of claw muscle tissues of the three crab species under analysis: comparison with literature data. Mean values, SE not reported. For literature data, means ± 95% confidence intervals are reported in italics. For the sake of comparison, literature information on other crab species of economic interest are reported at the bottom of the table.
| Species | Moisture(%) | Protein (%) | Ash (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.12 | 15.13 | 1.63 | ||
| 81.20 | 16.10 | 1.60 | ||
| 82.05 | 15.55 | 1.55 | ||
| 82.34 | 14.86 | 1.64 | ||
| 78.02 | 19.55 | |||
| 78.03 | 18.13 | 1.81 | ||
| 76.13 | 19.66 | 2.35 | ||
| 72.24 | 17.12 | 2.34 | ||
| 22.6 | ||||
| 77.96 | 17.02 | 2.25 | ||
| 76.77 | 18.4 | 2.1 | ||
| 76.3 | 19.1 | 2.2 | ||
| 78.7 | 17.1 | |||
| 79–81 | 17.8–18.2 | |||
| 78.8 | 18.9 | 1.89 | ||
| 79.2 | 15.7 | 2.55 | ||
| 84.4 | 14.3 | 1.67 | ||
averages of 77.4–86.7 (%moisture) 11.9–19.2 (%protein) and 1.3–1.8 (%ash).
average of 81.58–83.1 (%moisture) 14.71–15 (%protein) and 1.39–1.89 (%ash).
average of 19.4–25.8(%protein).
Fig. 1Score plot of the first two components of the principal components analysis (PCA) conducted with the proximate and element composition data characterizing Callinectes sapidus (circle symbol), Eriphia verrucosa (triangle), and Cancer pagurus (square) claw muscletissues. The most significant correlations with proximate parameters and chemical elements are shown.