| Literature DB >> 27441220 |
Hongfeng Zhang1, Xiwen Wang1, Yun Liang1.
Abstract
Optimizing the desired properties for stretch monolayer separators used in Lithium-ion batteries has been a challenge. In the present study a cellulose nanofiber/PET nonwoven composite separator is successfully fabricated, using a wet-laid nonwoven (papermaking) process, which can attain optimal properties in wettability, mechanical strength, thermal resistance, and electrochemical performance simultaneously. The PET nonwoven material, which is fabricated from ultrafine PET fibers by a wet-laid process, is a mechanical support layer. The porous structure of the composite separator was created by cellulose nanofibers coating the PET in a papermaking process. Cellulose nanofibers (CNFs), which are an eco-friendly sustainable resource, have been drawing considerable attention due to their astounding properties, such as: incredible specific surface area, thermal and chemical stability, high mechanical strength and hydrophilicity. The results show that the CNF separator exhibits higher porosity (70%) than a PP (polypropylene) separator (40%). The CNF separator can also be wetted by electrolyte in a few seconds while a PP separator cannot be entirely wetted after 1 min. The CNF separator has an electrolyte uptake of 250%, while a PP separator has only 65%. Another notable finding is that the CNF separator has almost no shrinkage when exposed to 180 °C for 1 h, whereas a PP separator shrinks by more than 50%. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) shows that the CNF separator has a higher melting point than a PP separator. These findings all indicate that the CNF 29 separator will be more favorable than stretch film for use in Lithium-ion batteries.Entities:
Keywords: Materials processes; Materials science; Nanomaterials; Natural product modification
Year: 2015 PMID: 27441220 PMCID: PMC4939761 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2015.e00032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Process of wet-laid multi-layer separator preparation.
Pore sizes of CNF separators at different pulp proportions.
| 1#+ 2# | 1#+ 3# | 1#+ 4# | 1#+ 5# | 1#+ 6# | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean pore size/μm | 3.20 ± 0.41 | 2.4 ± 0.32 | 1.08 ± 0.27 | 0.6 ± 0.17 | 0.30 ± 0.1 |
| Maximum pore size/μm | 7.63 ± 1.86 | 5.42 ± 1.32 | 3.67 ± 0.89 | 1.73 ± 0.36 | 0.83 ± 0.15 |
Fig. 2FESEM/SEM photographs of: (a) Single Tencel nanofiber; (b) PET nonwoven; (c) PP separator; (d) CNF separator.
Physical properties of the PET nonwoven, PP, PPTA/PET and CNF separators.
| Thickness /μm | Tensile strength/MPa | Modulus /MPa | Porosity /% | Electrolyte uptake /% | Mean pore size/μm | Maximum pore size/μm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP separator | 30 | 134.5 ± 3.5 | 298 ± 10.6 | 42 | 65 | 0.065 | 0.1 |
| CNF separator | 30 ± 3 | 57 ± 5 | 929.5 ± 3.5 | 70 ± 3 | 380 ± 5 | 0.30 ± 0.1 | 0.83 ± 0.15 |
| PET nonwoven | 18 ± 3 | – | – | 59 ± 4 | 80 ± 7 | 64.7 ± 8 | 117.3 ± 15 |
| PPTA/PET separator | 30 | – | – | 36 | 370 | 0.18 | 1.23 |
Fig. 4(a): Photographs of electrolyte (EC/DEC) wettability of PP separator, CNF separator. (b): Photograph of electrolyte immersion height of PP separator, CNF separator.
Fig. 3Photographs of contact angles of PET nonwoven, PP and CNF separators.
Fig. 5Thermal shrinkage comparison of the PP separator and CNF separator.
Fig. 6DSC diagram of CNF separator and PP separator.
Fig. 7Discharge profiles of cells with (a) CNF separator, (b) PP separator. (c) Comparison of cycling performance between CNF separator and PP separator.