| Literature DB >> 27441218 |
Kyungreem Han1, Jinwoong Kim2, MooYoung Choi1.
Abstract
Autophagy is a lysosomal degradation pathway, which is critical for maintaining normal cellular functions. Despite considerable advances in defining the specific molecular mechanism governing the autophagy pathway during the last decades, we are still far from understanding the underlying principle of the autophagy machinery and its complex role in human disease. As an alternative attempt to reinvigorate the search for the principle of the autophagy pathway, we in this study make use of the computer-aided analysis, complementing current molecular-level studies of autophagy. Specifically, we propose a hypothesis that autophagy mediates cellular phase transitions and demonstrate that the autophagic phase transitions are essential to the maintenance of normal cellular functions and critical in the fate of a cell, i.e., cell death or survival. This study should provide valuable insight into how interactions of sub-cellular components such as genes and protein modules/complexes regulate autophagy and then impact on the dynamic behaviors of living cells as a whole, bridging the microscopic molecular-level studies and the macroscopic cellular-level and physiological approaches.Entities:
Keywords: Autophagy; Mathematical model; Phase transitions; Simulations
Year: 2015 PMID: 27441218 PMCID: PMC4939812 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2015.e00027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Summary of the minimal autophagy model. The solid (blue) arrow describes the (total) protein/organelle synthesis RS (from DNA). While resident protein/organelle S1 is entirely synthesized from DNA, abnormal one S2 is produced either directly from DNA or indirectly via the deterioration of S1: The production rates RS1 and RS2 of S1 and S2 thus read and , where and denote the fraction of S2 in the (total) protein/organelle synthesis rate RS (from DNA) and the (specific) deterioration rate of S1, respectively. The dotted (green) and three dashed (red) arrows depict, respectively, non-autophagic degradation of rates and autophagic degradation steps including autophagosome formation of rates , autolysosome formation of rate , and intralysosomal hydrolysis of rate , where the subscript i labels resident (i = 1) and abnormal (i = 2) protein/organelle, respectively. The differential equations describe time evolutions of the corresponding intracellular concentrations , , , , and of autophagosomes, autolysosomes, protein/organelles, amino acids, and ATP, respectively. All concentrations have time arguments t unless specified otherwise, e.g., and so on; the rate of changes of the autolysosome concentration at time t depends on , and at time t – τ, earlier by the delay time , which is taken to be 8 min (τ = 480 s).
Parameters in computer simulations.
| Parameter | Value | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rate constant for autophagosome formation | |||
| Rate constant for autophagosome formation | |||
| Rate constant for autophagosome formation | |||
| Rate constant for autophagosome formation | |||
| Rate constant for autophagosome formation | |||
| Rate constant for deterioration of S1 | |||
| Constant for the protein/organelle synthesis | |||
| Constant for autophagosome formation | |||
| Constant for autophagosome formation | |||
| Constant for autophagosome formation | |||
| Constant for autophagosome formation | |||
| Constant for autophagosome formation | |||
| Rate constant for autolysosome formation | |||
| Constant for autolysosome formation | |||
| Constant for autolysosome formation | |||
| Rate constant for intralysosomal hydrolysis | |||
| Exponent for intralysosomal hydrolysis | |||
| Constant for intralysosomal hydrolysis | |||
| Rate constant for protein/organelle synthesis | |||
| Constant for protein/organelle synthesis | |||
| ATP concentration corresponding to maximal protein/organelle synthesis rate |
Parameters with asterisks are fixed from the target biological experiments in Refs. [5][6][7][30]. Those without asterisks are determined from computer simulations or adjustable depending on simulation setups.
Fig. 2Dynamics of amino acid and ATP concentrations depending on autophagic flux. A and B show how the concentrations C of amino acids and C of ATP change with the autophagic flux. The level of autophagic flux is suppressed or promoted by adjusting the value of . Details of the corresponding behaviors for small values of r are shown in C and D. The concentrations (solid red lines) exhibit discontinuous jumps at r = r(1) ≈ 0.032 (in units of the normal value r(0)) and continuous transitions at r = r(2) ≈ 0.315, beyond which oscillations develop. Splits in the lines manifest emergence of oscillations, with the upper and lower lines plotting the maximum and minimum values of the oscillations, respectively, and the dotted blue lines representing the average values. E and F exhibit the time evolutions of C and C for three values of r (= 0.02, 0.1, and 0.5).
Fig. 3Relationship between the average concentrations and of resident and abnormal protein/organelles, depending on autophagic flux, at various values of the cellular deterioration rate β. Data points are plotted from the upper left corner as the autophagosome formation rate constant is increased from = 0 to = 0.1 (in units of ) at the increment of 0.01 and from = 0.1 to = 100 at the increment of 0.1.
Fig. 4Fractional abnormal protein/organelle concentration versus the autophagosome formation rate constant . The upper and lower panels display the dependence on the promotion and suppression, respectively, of the rate constant (in units of ). Data have been obtained at the specific deterioration rate β = 0.2 %/h, higher than the normal value β = 0.15 %/h β(0), where the resident protein/organelle synthesis rate is approximately equal to the abnormal one.