| Literature DB >> 27441217 |
Olga I Dadalko1, Kevin Niswender2, Aurelio Galli3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Food intake is highly regulated by central homeostatic and hedonic mechanisms in response to peripheral and environmental cues. Neutral energy balance stems from proper integration of homeostatic signals with those "sensing" the rewarding properties of food. Impairments in brain insulin signaling causes dysregulation of feeding behaviors and, as a consequence, hyperphagia. Here, we sought to determine how the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2), a complex involved in insulin signaling, influences high fat feeding.Entities:
Keywords: AMPH, Amphetamine; Amphetamine; DA, Dopamine; Dopamine; HF, High fat; High fat diet; LF, Low fat; Obesity; Rictor; mTORC2; mTORC2, mammalian Target Of Rapamycin Complex 2
Year: 2015 PMID: 27441217 PMCID: PMC4939830 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2015.e00025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Energy balance and body composition of TH Rictor KO mice on low-fat diet (LF) (A) Body composition of TH Rictor KO and CTR mice; n = 8 per genotype. (B) Cumulative food intake (LF diet) was measured over the course of eight weeks and was found to be indistinguishable from the LF food intake of CTR animals; n = 6–7 per genotype. (C) Feed efficiency over the corresponding eight week period was calculated as change in total body weight, fat, or lean mass in grams divided by total kcal consumed. Values represent mean ± SEM; ***p < 0.001.
Fig. 2Energy balance of TH Rictor KO mice on high-fat diet (HF). (A) Genotype-specific difference in cumulative consumption of HF food relative to LF food consumption (average low-fat food intake was subtracted from high-fat food intake in kcal); n = 7–9 per treatment per genotype. Inset: Cumulative food intake (high-fat diet) was measured over the course of eight weeks. In both graphs, high-fat food-induced escalating hyperphagia is shown for TH Rictor KO mice compared to CTR animals; n = 6–7 per genotype. (B) Body composition over the corresponding eight week period was measured and graphed to compare with CTR mice; n = 8 per genotype. (C) Feed efficiency over the corresponding eight week period was calculated as change in total body weight, fat, or lean mass in grams divided by total kcal consumed); n = 4–5 per genotype. Values represent mean ± SEM; ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05.
Fig. 3Aberrant NAc DA tone and disrupted DA-dependent behaviors in TH Rictor KO mice. (A) DA tissue content as measured by HPLC in NAc homogenates; n = 6–8 per genotype. (B) Novelty-induced locomotion: horizontal movement measured in open field chambers in 5-min intervals; n = 8 per genotype. Data are represented as area under the curve (AUC) for the first 30 min in the chamber. (C) AMPH-induced locomotion; n = 7–8 per treatment per genotype. CTR and TH Rictor KO mice were habituated to saline injections and open field chambers for six days. On day seven AMPH (2 mg/kg) was administered i.p. and horizontal locomotor activity recorded in 5-min intervals. Data are represented as area under the curve (AUC) from time of injection to 30 min, expressed as percent of corresponding saline control. Values represent mean ± SEM; **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05.