| Literature DB >> 27441210 |
John A Ajiboye1, Ochuko L Erukainure2, Babatunde A Lawal1, Viola A Nwachukwu2, Adesewa O Tugbobo-Amisu2, Ebelechukwu N Okafor2.
Abstract
The comparative hypocholesteremic effect of feeding palm oil and palm oil mill effluent (POME) was investigated in male albino rats. Diets were prepared and designed to contain 50% of energy as carbohydrate, 35% as fat, and 15% as protein. Groups of six rats were each fed one of these diets, while a group was fed pelletized mouse chow which served as the control. Feeding on palm oil and POME led to a significant increase (p < 0.05) in serum total cholesterol, triglyceride, and vLDL. Feeding on POME led to significant increase (p < 0.05) in cholesterol, triglyceride and LDL levels in brain tissues. Increased hepatic LDL level was also observed in POME fed rats. Except for hepatic triglyceride and tissues HDL level, a rather reduced level of the studied lipids was observed in the serum and tissues of palm oil fed rats compared to POME. These results indicate the protective potentials of palm oil against cardiovascular disease, as well as hyperlipidemia that characterize obesity and hypertension; as compared to its effluent.Entities:
Keywords: Atherogenic indices; Hypocholestermia; Palm oil and POME
Year: 2015 PMID: 27441210 PMCID: PMC4939815 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2015.e00010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Serum cholesterol level of experimental groups. Values = mean + SD; n = 6. (a) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 1; (b) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 2; (c) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 3; (d) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 4.
Fig. 2Tissue cholesterol levels of experimental groups. Values = mean + SD; n = 6. (a) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 1; (b) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 2; (c) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 3; (d) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 4.
Fig. 3Tissue triglyceride levels of experimental groups. Values = mean + SD; n = 6. (a) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 1; (b) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 2; (c) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 3; (d) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 4.
Fig. 4Tissue LDL levels of experimental groups. Values = mean + SD; n = 6. (a) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 1; (b) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 2; (c) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 3; (d) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 4.
Fig. 5Tissue HDL levels of experimental groups. Values = mean + SD; n = 6. (a) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 1; (b) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 2; (c) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 3; (d) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 4.
Fig. 6Serum atherogenic indices of experimental groups. Values = mean + SD; n = 6. (a) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 1; (b) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 2; (c) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 3; (d) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) as compared with group 4.
Composition of diets used.
| Ingredients | Mouse Chow | Diet 1 | Diet 2 | Diet 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corn starch | – | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Soybean powder (defatted) | – | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Palm Oil | – | – | 35 | – |
| POME | – | – | – | 35 |
| Distilled water | – | 35 | – | – |
Data are present in percentage.