Literature DB >> 27440280

Standardized technique for single-docking robotic rectal surgery.

J Ahmed1, N Siddiqi2, L Khan2, A Kuzu3, A Parvaiz2,4.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this technical note is to describe our standardized technique for rectal surgery using a single-docking totally robotic approach.
METHOD: The data related to patients who underwent single-docking robotic rectal surgery were analysed for the feasibility of this approach.
RESULTS: This technique was used in 124 consecutive patients who underwent rectal resection since July 2013. Male to female ratio of patients was 2:1 while median age was 67 years (range 24-92). The median operating time was 240 min (range 105-456), whilst blood loss was 10 ml (range 0-200). There was no evidence of intra-operative complications or conversions to either a laparoscopic or an open procedure. The median length of stay was 7 days (range 3-48).
CONCLUSION: A single-docking technique for robotic rectal surgery is safe and feasible. It can be considered as standard approach for pelvic robotic surgery. Colorectal Disease
© 2016 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rectal surgery; TME; robotic approach

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27440280     DOI: 10.1111/codi.13466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  7 in total

1.  Robotic pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  P Tejedor; F Sagias; A Ahmed; S Naqvi; J S Khan
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  The impact of robotic total mesorectal excision on survival of patients with rectal cancer-a propensity matched analysis.

Authors:  P Tejedor; F Sagias; K Flashman; Yeh Han Lee; S Naqvi; N Kandala; Jim Khan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Implementation of robotic rectal surgery training programme: importance of standardisation and structured training.

Authors:  Sofoklis Panteleimonitis; Sotirios Popeskou; Mohamed Aradaib; Mick Harper; Jamil Ahmed; Mukhtar Ahmad; Tahseen Qureshi; Nuno Figueiredo; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Precision in robotic rectal surgery using the da Vinci Xi system and integrated table motion, a technical note.

Authors:  Sofoklis Panteleimonitis; Mick Harper; Stuart Hall; Nuno Figueiredo; Tahseen Qureshi; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-09-15

5.  Robotic surgery for colorectal disease: review of current port placement and future perspectives.

Authors:  Jong Lyul Lee; Hassan A Alsaleem; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 1.859

6.  Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Jan-Hendrik Egberts; Jan-Niclas Kersebaum; Benno Mann; Heiko Aselmann; Markus Hirschburger; Julia Graß; Thomas Becker; Jakob Izbicki; Daniel Perez
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Short-term clinical outcomes of a European training programme for robotic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Sofoklis Panteleimonitis; Danilo Miskovic; Rachelle Bissett-Amess; Nuno Figueiredo; Matthias Turina; Giuseppe Spinoglio; Richard J Heald; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.