K M Lövgren1,2, H Søndergaard3, S Skov4, B Wiinberg5. 1. Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. kmlq@novonordisk.com. 2. Translational Haemophilia Pharmacology, Global Research, Novo Nordisk A/S, Maaloev, Denmark. kmlq@novonordisk.com. 3. Diabetes Complications Pharmacology, Novo Nordisk A/S, Maaloev, Denmark. 4. Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. 5. Haemophilia Translational Biology, Global Research, Novo Nordisk A/S, Maaloev, Denmark.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The most serious complication in haemophilia A (HA) replacement therapy with coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) is neutralizing antibodies, i.e. inhibitors. It has been hypothesized that danger signals generated during a bleed might have an adjuvant effect on the immune response to FVIII in on-demand treatment, increasing the inhibitor risk. AIM: To compare the antibody response to treatment with recombinant human FVIII (rhFVIII) in relation to induced knee joint bleeds and treatment without concurrent bleeds in a HA rat model. METHOD: HA rats were divided into two groups: one group (n = 10) receiving three needle induced knee joint bleeds 14 days apart and a control group (n = 9) receiving three sham procedures. Three hours after each injury/sham 50 IU kg(-1) rhFVIII was administrated intravenously. Subsequently, both groups continued rhFVIII treatment for another 9 weeks. Binding antibodies were analysed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and neutralizing antibodies using a Bethesda-like assay. RESULTS: Rats in the knee-bleed group developed a significantly faster inhibitor response and reached significantly higher inhibitor levels. In the knee-bleed group, 80% developed inhibitors vs. 33% in the control group, demonstrating a 2.4 times higher inhibitor risk when treating concurrent with bleeds. CONCLUSION: FVIII treatment in relation to a bleed potentiates inhibitor development compared to FVIII treatment alone in this HA rat, indicating that bleeding is a potential danger signal. Our results support the theory that FVIII replacement therapy concurrent with a bleeding episode increases the inhibitor risk, which to the best of our knowledge, has not been confirmed in an animal model before.
INTRODUCTION: The most serious complication in haemophilia A (HA) replacement therapy with coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) is neutralizing antibodies, i.e. inhibitors. It has been hypothesized that danger signals generated during a bleed might have an adjuvant effect on the immune response to FVIII in on-demand treatment, increasing the inhibitor risk. AIM: To compare the antibody response to treatment with recombinant humanFVIII (rhFVIII) in relation to induced knee joint bleeds and treatment without concurrent bleeds in a HA rat model. METHOD: HA rats were divided into two groups: one group (n = 10) receiving three needle induced knee joint bleeds 14 days apart and a control group (n = 9) receiving three sham procedures. Three hours after each injury/sham 50 IU kg(-1) rhFVIII was administrated intravenously. Subsequently, both groups continued rhFVIII treatment for another 9 weeks. Binding antibodies were analysed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and neutralizing antibodies using a Bethesda-like assay. RESULTS:Rats in the knee-bleed group developed a significantly faster inhibitor response and reached significantly higher inhibitor levels. In the knee-bleed group, 80% developed inhibitors vs. 33% in the control group, demonstrating a 2.4 times higher inhibitor risk when treating concurrent with bleeds. CONCLUSION:FVIII treatment in relation to a bleed potentiates inhibitor development compared to FVIII treatment alone in this HA rat, indicating that bleeding is a potential danger signal. Our results support the theory that FVIII replacement therapy concurrent with a bleeding episode increases the inhibitor risk, which to the best of our knowledge, has not been confirmed in an animal model before.
Authors: Maria T Georgescu; Paul C Moorehead; Alice S van Velzen; Kate Nesbitt; Birgit M Reipert; Katharina N Steinitz; Maria Schuster; Christine Hough; David Lillicrap Journal: Haematologica Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 9.941