OBJECTIVE: To assess predictors of positive oral food challenge test (OFC) in neonates that are suggestive of gastrointestinal food allergy. METHODS: A prospective case accumulations study on neonates suspected of having gastrointestinal food allergy was conducted in 126 neonatal intensive care units in Japan between April 2010 and September 2011. Neonates who underwent an OFC for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal food allergy were enrolled. Clinical backgrounds, clinical symptoms, and laboratory findings were compared between neonates with a positive OFC and those with a negative OFC. RESULTS: An analysis was performed in 32 neonates. The OFC results were positive in 9 neonates (28.1%), pseudo-positive in 4, and negative in 19. There were no significant differences in clinical backgrounds between the positive OFC group and the negative OFC group. Vomiting and bloody stool were frequently observed in both groups (approximately 70%), although there were no significant differences in the clinical symptoms between the two groups. Additional diagnostic tests included those for eosinophils in the peripheral blood and stool mucus and allergen-specific lymphocyte stimulation test. There were no significant differences in laboratory findings between the two groups, and many neonates showed pseudo-positive in all of the tests. CONCLUSION: It was difficult to predict OFC results based on clinical symptoms and additional diagnostic test results. In order to obtain an accurate diagnosis of gastrointestinal food allergy in neonates, OFC should be performed proactively under conditions that enable complete understanding of risks to neonates.
OBJECTIVE: To assess predictors of positive oral food challenge test (OFC) in neonates that are suggestive of gastrointestinal food allergy. METHODS: A prospective case accumulations study on neonates suspected of having gastrointestinal food allergy was conducted in 126 neonatal intensive care units in Japan between April 2010 and September 2011. Neonates who underwent an OFC for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal food allergy were enrolled. Clinical backgrounds, clinical symptoms, and laboratory findings were compared between neonates with a positive OFC and those with a negative OFC. RESULTS: An analysis was performed in 32 neonates. The OFC results were positive in 9 neonates (28.1%), pseudo-positive in 4, and negative in 19. There were no significant differences in clinical backgrounds between the positive OFC group and the negative OFC group. Vomiting and bloody stool were frequently observed in both groups (approximately 70%), although there were no significant differences in the clinical symptoms between the two groups. Additional diagnostic tests included those for eosinophils in the peripheral blood and stool mucus and allergen-specific lymphocyte stimulation test. There were no significant differences in laboratory findings between the two groups, and many neonates showed pseudo-positive in all of the tests. CONCLUSION: It was difficult to predict OFC results based on clinical symptoms and additional diagnostic test results. In order to obtain an accurate diagnosis of gastrointestinal food allergy in neonates, OFC should be performed proactively under conditions that enable complete understanding of risks to neonates.