| Literature DB >> 27439445 |
Laura Banks1, Greg D Wells2,3, Nadia A Clarizia1, Emilie Jean-St-Michel1, Adam L McKillop1, Andrew N Redington1,4, Brian W McCrindle1,4.
Abstract
We sought to determine whether a 9-day remote ischemic preconditioning (IPC) causes improvements in exercise performance, energetics, and blood pressure. Ten participants (mean age 24 ± 4 years) had no changes in aerobic capacity (preintervention: 38 ± 10 mL/(kg·min)(-1) vs. postintervention: 38 ± 10 mL/(kg·min)(-1)), blood pressure (preintervention: 112 ± 7/66 ± 6 mm Hg vs. postintervention: 112 ± 10/62 ± 5 mm Hg), cardiac phosphocreatinine-to-adenosine-triphosphate ratio (preintervention: 2.1 ± 0.5 vs. postintervention: 2.3 ± 0.4), and postexercise skeletal muscle phosphocreatine recovery (preintervention: 34 ± 11 s vs. postintervention: 31 ± 11 s). Short-term remote IPC may be ineffective in improving these outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: cardiac energy metabolism; consommation d’oxygène de pointe; ischemia–reperfusion; ischémie-reperfusion; magnetic resonance spectroscopy; métabolisme énergétique cardiaque; peak oxygen consumption; phosphocreatine recovery; phosphocréatine de récupération; spectroscopie par résonance magnétique
Mesh：
Substances：
Year: 2016 PMID： 27439445 DOI： 10.1139/apnm-2016-0024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab ISSN： 1715-5312 Impact factor: 2.665