Nima Gilani1, Paul Malcolm2, Glyn Johnson1. 1. Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom. 2. Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Quantitative diffusion MRI has frequently been studied as a means of grading prostate cancer. Interpretation of results is complicated by the nature of prostate tissue, which consists of four distinct compartments: vascular, ductal lumen, epithelium, and stroma. Current diffusion measurements are an ill-defined weighted average of these compartments. In this study, prostate diffusion is analyzed in terms of a model that takes explicit account of tissue compartmentalization, exchange effects, and the non-Gaussian behavior of tissue diffusion. METHOD: The model assumes that exchange between the cellular (ie, stromal plus epithelial) and the vascular and ductal compartments is slow. Ductal and cellular diffusion characteristics are estimated by Monte Carlo simulation and a two-compartment exchange model, respectively. Vascular pseudodiffusion is represented by an additional signal at b = 0. Most model parameters are obtained either from published data or by comparing model predictions with the published results from 41 studies. Model prediction error is estimated using 10-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: Agreement between model predictions and published results is good. The model satisfactorily explains the variability of ADC estimates found in the literature. CONCLUSION: A reliable model that predicts the diffusion behavior of benign and cancerous prostate tissue of different Gleason scores has been developed. Magn Reson Med 78:316-326, 2017.
PURPOSE: Quantitative diffusion MRI has frequently been studied as a means of grading prostate cancer. Interpretation of results is complicated by the nature of prostate tissue, which consists of four distinct compartments: vascular, ductal lumen, epithelium, and stroma. Current diffusion measurements are an ill-defined weighted average of these compartments. In this study, prostate diffusion is analyzed in terms of a model that takes explicit account of tissue compartmentalization, exchange effects, and the non-Gaussian behavior of tissue diffusion. METHOD: The model assumes that exchange between the cellular (ie, stromal plus epithelial) and the vascular and ductal compartments is slow. Ductal and cellular diffusion characteristics are estimated by Monte Carlo simulation and a two-compartment exchange model, respectively. Vascular pseudodiffusion is represented by an additional signal at b = 0. Most model parameters are obtained either from published data or by comparing model predictions with the published results from 41 studies. Model prediction error is estimated using 10-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: Agreement between model predictions and published results is good. The model satisfactorily explains the variability of ADC estimates found in the literature. CONCLUSION: A reliable model that predicts the diffusion behavior of benign and cancerous prostate tissue of different Gleason scores has been developed. Magn Reson Med 78:316-326, 2017.
Authors: Dariya I Malyarenko; Scott D Swanson; Sean D McGarry; Peter S LaViolette; Thomas L Chenevert Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-11-14 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ana E Rodríguez-Soto; Maren M Sjaastad Andreassen; Lauren K Fang; Christopher C Conlin; Helen H Park; Grace S Ahn; Hauke Bartsch; Joshua Kuperman; Igor Vidić; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Anne M Wallace; Michael Hahn; Tyler M Seibert; Neil Peter Jerome; Agnes Østlie; Tone Frost Bathen; Pål Erik Goa; Rebecca Rakow-Penner; Anders M Dale Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Rosie J Goodburn; Tristan Barrett; Ilse Patterson; Ferdia A Gallagher; Edward M Lawrence; Vincent J Gnanapragasam; Christof Kastner; Andrew N Priest Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Anna Mlynarska-Bujny; Sebastian Bickelhaupt; Frederik Bernd Laun; Franziska König; Wolfgang Lederer; Heidi Daniel; Mark Edward Ladd; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Stefan Delorme; Tristan Anselm Kuder Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 4.379