| Literature DB >> 27439312 |
L M Rocha-Ramírez1, U Hernández-Chiñas2,3, D Baños-Rojas4, J Xicohtencatl-Cortés5, M E Chávez-Berrocal2,3, G Rico-Rosillo6, R Kretschmer7, C A Eslava8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pet is a toxin from the family of Serine Protease Autotransporters of Enterobacteriaceae which was initially identified in Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli strains. This protease exhibits enterotoxin properties, damages the cell cytoskeleton and induces intestinal epithelium alterations, which are associated with a severe inflammatory process. An in-vitro study was conducted to evaluate the effect of Pet on the migration of human peripheral blood monocytes-derived macrophages and its participation in the activation of the early inflammatory response and cytokine expression.Entities:
Keywords: Cytokines; Escherichia coli; Innate immune response; Serin protease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27439312 PMCID: PMC4955197 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-016-0775-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1Purification of Pet protein by FPLC. Pet protein was purified from supernatant of the minimal clone HB101(pCEFN1).a Culture supernatant ammonium sulfateprecipitated was passed through a Q-Sepharose and FPLC columns. b The toxin specificity was analyzed by Western blot with anti-pet antibody (1:500) and the reaction visualized with rabbit anti-IgG antibody conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (1:5000). The reaction was evidenced adding BCIP/NBT. Lines: MW markers; 1 Pet toxin; 2 Entamoeba histolytica HMI-IMSS antigen
Fig. 2Histological Study of fractions obtained from rat ileal loops. Rat ileal loops inoculated with: a live O42EAEC bacteria (1.5 × 108 UFC/mL); b 100 μg of purified Pet toxin and c PBS. The intestine preparations were Hematoxilin-Eosin stained and observed in light microscope (400X). Presence of hemorrhage (arrow), necrosis (arrow), ulceration and fibrinopurulent exudates (arrow) of the intestinal epithelium a and b. Non histological changes were observed in c
Activation of human macrophages migration induced by Pet Protein in a Boyden chamber assay
| Treatment | Cells number × fieldsa | Macrophages migration |
|---|---|---|
| Hank’s solution BSA (0.2 %) | 5 ± 2.5 | 16 |
| ZAS | 30 ± 3.4 | 100 |
| Pet 5 μg/ml | 10 ± 2.2 | 33 |
| Pet 10 μg/ml | 15 ± 5.1 | 50 |
| Pet 20 μg/ml | 22 ± 4.3 | 73 |
Values are mean ± SD
aCells x fields refers the migrated cells counted in five randomly selected fields what were observed under a microscope set at 400 X magnification. The date of percentage presented are compared with the 30 cells observed with the stimulus treatment with ZAS (Positive control)
Fig. 3Cytokines production of MDM stimulated with Pet toxin from EAEC. Supernatants of MDM stimulated with Pet (1 to 20 μg/ml) were analyzed by ELISA test to determine the cytokines expression. a IL-8, b TNF-α and c IL-10. The MDM cells were treated with E. coli. 0111:B4 LPS (0.1 μg/ml); Polymyxin B (PMB), LPS and Polymyxin B (LPS/PMB), Pet (20 μg/ml) and Polymyxin B (Pet20/PMB), and untreated cells (s/e). The cytokine concentrations weredeterminedat 6(□) and 24 h (■) of stimulation. The results are the means ± of the standard deviation representative of four independent experiments. Significant P < 0.05 (*), as compared between 6 and 24 h of stimulation
Fig. 4Immunofluorescence analysis of NF-kB activation. a Human macrophages were stimulated during 30 min with Pet (10 μg/ml) or LPS (Positive control) and non-stimulated. The nuclear translocation is determined (arrows) by the blue fluorescence (Hoechst staining) and the NF-kB p65 subunit (arrows) by its green fluorescence (Dylight 488). b Percentage of nucleic positive cells to p65. The results are representative of three independent experiments