L Ekenros1, Z Papoutsi2,3, C Fridén1,4, K Dahlman Wright2, A Lindén Hirschberg5. 1. Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden. 2. Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, NOVUM, Huddinge, Sweden. 3. Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 4. Academic Primary Health Care Center, St Erik Primary Health Care Center, Stockholm, Sweden. 5. Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
AIM: Variations in sex hormone levels during the menstrual cycle may affect neuromuscular performance and the risk of sustaining musculoskeletal injury in women. The aim of this study was to investigate mRNA and protein levels for sex steroid hormone receptors in skeletal muscle in three distinct phases of the menstrual cycle. METHODS: Fifteen, healthy women with regular menstrual cycles participated in the study. Muscle biopsies from the vastus lateralis were obtained in three hormonally verified phases of the menstrual cycle for each individual, that is the follicular phase, the ovulatory phase and the luteal phase. mRNA and protein levels of oestrogen (ERα and ERβ), progesterone (PR) and androgen (AR) receptors were analysed. RESULTS: There was an overall significant variation in mRNA and protein levels of ERα and PR across the menstrual cycle. mRNA and protein levels of ERα were highest in the follicular phase when oestradiol levels were low, whereas protein levels of PR were highest in the luteal phase when progesterone levels were high. mRNA levels of PR were highest in the ovulatory phase. No significant variation in AR levels was detected across the menstrual cycle. ERβ levels were very low in all three phases of the menstrual cycle. CONCLUSION: Significant variations in mRNA and protein levels of ERα and PR were detected in skeletal muscle during three confirmed phases of the menstrual cycle. These results may have an impact on effects of muscular training and sports injuries in women.
AIM: Variations in sex hormone levels during the menstrual cycle may affect neuromuscular performance and the risk of sustaining musculoskeletal injury in women. The aim of this study was to investigate mRNA and protein levels for sex steroid hormone receptors in skeletal muscle in three distinct phases of the menstrual cycle. METHODS: Fifteen, healthy women with regular menstrual cycles participated in the study. Muscle biopsies from the vastus lateralis were obtained in three hormonally verified phases of the menstrual cycle for each individual, that is the follicular phase, the ovulatory phase and the luteal phase. mRNA and protein levels of oestrogen (ERα and ERβ), progesterone (PR) and androgen (AR) receptors were analysed. RESULTS: There was an overall significant variation in mRNA and protein levels of ERα and PR across the menstrual cycle. mRNA and protein levels of ERα were highest in the follicular phase when oestradiol levels were low, whereas protein levels of PR were highest in the luteal phase when progesterone levels were high. mRNA levels of PR were highest in the ovulatory phase. No significant variation in AR levels was detected across the menstrual cycle. ERβ levels were very low in all three phases of the menstrual cycle. CONCLUSION: Significant variations in mRNA and protein levels of ERα and PR were detected in skeletal muscle during three confirmed phases of the menstrual cycle. These results may have an impact on effects of muscular training and sports injuries in women.
Authors: Mackenzie Haines; Sarah K McKinley-Barnard; Thomas L Andre; Josh J Gann; Paul S Hwang; Darryn S Willoughby Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Stephen A Fortino; Mai Wageh; Riley Pontello; Chris McGlory; Dinesh Kumbhare; Stuart M Phillips; Gianni Parise Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-04-29 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Alessandra Pucci Mantelli Galhardo; Márcio Katsuyoshi Mukai; Matsuyoshi Mori; Katia Candido Carvalho; Maria Cândida Pinheiro Baracat; Manuel de Jesus Simões; José Maria Soares; Edmund Chada Baracat Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 4.379