Literature DB >> 2743847

Assessment of accuracy of intraesophageal pH probe in a dog model.

D W Murphy1, K B Faust, V M Chiantella, D O Castell.   

Abstract

We performed an experiment in dogs in order to assess the accuracy of an intraesophageal pH probe and to examine possible mechanisms for any lack of accuracy. Two pH probes were placed in the esophagus of supine anesthetized dogs and acid was infused in small serial volumes from an infusion tube placed at the gastroesophageal junction. Two general patterns of pH probe responses were seen: (1) neither probe recorded a fall in pH with acid infusion, and (2) both probes recorded a fall in pH, but in a nonsynchronous manner. Changing the relationship of the tips of the probes with respect to the adjacent mucosa caused a fall in the pH recorded by each probe to the pH of the intraesophageal infusate. This and other evidence seen in the pH tracings suggest that mucosal abutment of the probe tips causes a falsely negative pH recording and raises the question of whether such a phenomenon occurs in human studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2743847     DOI: 10.1007/bf01536378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  10 in total

1.  INTRALUMINAL AND JUXTAMUCOSAL DUODENAL PH.

Authors:  J BIRCHER; C V MANN; H C CARLSON; C F CODE; R A ROVELSTAD
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1965-04       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  On the mechanism of intestinal absorption of drugs.

Authors:  C A HOGBEN; D J TOCCO; B B BRODIE; L S SCHANKER
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  [Experimental studies on the effect of inhibitory drugs on the human stomach].

Authors:  L DEMLING; H KINZLMEIER; N HENNING
Journal:  Gastroenterologia       Date:  1952

4.  Factors influencing the continuous recording of in situ pH of gastric and duodenal contents.

Authors:  R A ROVELSTAD; C A OWEN; T B MAGATH
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1952-04       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Studies of the pH gradient and thickness of frog gastric mucus gel.

Authors:  K Takeuchi; D Magee; J Critchlow; J Matthews; W Silen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Long-term ambulatory gastric pH monitoring: validation of a new method and effect of H2-antagonists.

Authors:  C J Fimmel; A Etienne; T Cilluffo; C von Ritter; T Gasser; J P Rey; P Caradonna-Moscatelli; F Sabbatini; F Pace; H W Bühler
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Demonstration of a pH gradient across mucus adherent to rabbit gastric mucosa: evidence for a 'mucus-bicarbonate' barrier.

Authors:  S E Williams; L A Turnberg
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  Gastroesophageal reflux. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy.

Authors:  J E Richter; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  pH of the microclimate lining human gastric and duodenal mucosa in vivo. Studies in control subjects and in duodenal ulcer patients.

Authors:  E M Quigley; L A Turnberg
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  New concepts and methods in the study and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  L F Johnson
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.456

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Variations in results of simultaneous ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  F J Hampton; U M MacFadyen; J F Mayberry
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Cats During Anesthesia and Effect of Omeprazole on Gastric pH.

Authors:  R S Garcia; P C Belafsky; A Della Maggiore; J M Osborn; B H Pypendop; T Pierce; V J Walker; A Fulton; S L Marks
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.333

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.