Literature DB >> 27438175

Three-Dimensional Against 2-Dimensional Laparoscopic Colectomy for Right-sided Colon Cancer.

Kaixiong Tao1, Xinghua Liu, Meizhou Deng, Wenjia Shi, Jinbo Gao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Major limitations of conventional 2-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy are a lack of depth perception and spatial orientation. Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy was developed to overcome the limitations of the 2D technique. However, it has not been widely accepted due to a lack of conclusive evidence of benefit. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of 3D laparoscopy on the operative performance during elective laparoscopic right colectomy.
METHODS: A total of 58 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic colectomy for right-sided colon cancer by a single experienced surgeon between January 2014 and July 2015. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to the vision system of laparoscopy: 27 patients were operated by 3D laparoscopy (3D group, n=27) and 31 patients were performed by 2D laparoscopy (2D group, n=31). Data of these patients were collected and analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS: The operative time was significantly shorter in the 3D group than in the 2D group (130.5±27.6 vs. 152.2±28.9 min, P=0.005). There was no significant difference in blood loss in the 3D group when compared with the 2D group. There was no operative mortality in the 2 groups. The number of lymph nodes resected was similar in both groups. Time to pass the first flatus and postoperative hospital stay showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. The postoperative complication rate for the 3D and the 2D groups were similar: 14.8% (4/27) and 9.7% (3/31), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D laparoscopy appears to reduce the performance time of laparoscopic colectomy when compared with 2D laparoscopy. Further studies are required to address the role of the 3D vision system in laparoscopic colectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27438175     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  9 in total

1.  The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Nereo Vettoretto; Nader K Francis; Marco Augusto Bonino; Nathan J Curtis; Daniele Amparore; Simone Arolfo; Manuel Barberio; Luigi Boni; Ronit Brodie; Nicole Bouvy; Elisa Cassinotti; Thomas Carus; Enrico Checcucci; Petra Custers; Michele Diana; Marilou Jansen; Joris Jaspers; Gadi Marom; Kota Momose; Beat P Müller-Stich; Kyokazu Nakajima; Felix Nickel; Silvana Perretta; Francesco Porpiglia; Francisco Sánchez-Margallo; Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Marlies Schijven; Gianfranco Silecchia; Roberto Passera; Yoav Mintz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Video-Assisted Endoscopic Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Data.

Authors:  Hengrui Liang; Wenhua Liang; Zhao Lei; Zhichao Liu; Wei Wang; Jiaxi He; Yuan Zeng; Weizhe Huang; Manting Wang; Yuehan Chen; Jianxing He
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nereo Vettoretto; Luisa Reggiani; Roberto Cirocchi; Brandon Michael Henry; Piero Covarelli; Vito D'Andrea; Georgi Popivanov; Justus Randolph
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Comparison of short-term surgical outcome between 3D and 2D laparoscopy surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bochao Zhao; Wu Lv; Di Mei; Rui Luo; Shiyang Bao; Baojun Huang; Jie Lin
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Three-dimensional Versus Two-dimensional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  George Pantalos; Dimitrios Patsouras; Eleftherios Spartalis; Dimitrios Dimitroulis; Gerasimos Tsourouflis; Nikolaos Nikiteas
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Laparoscopic colectomies associated with decreased retrieval of 12 or more lymph nodes compared to open in elective colon cancer surgery.

Authors:  Yana Puckett; Diana Mitchell; Theophilus Pham
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2019-10-14

7.  Three-dimensional vs 2-dimensional laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lian Chen; Bo Li; Lianli Zeng; Jiani Zhao; Jun Lei; Hongliang Luo; Fengming Yi; Wenxiong Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 8.  Comparison between 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional endoscopic thyroidectomy for benign and malignant lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zigao Huang; Haiquan Qin; Jiankun Liao; Linghou Meng; Yongjie Qin; Baojia Li; Hao Lai; Xianwei Mo
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Three-dimensional versus conventional two-dimensional laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: A 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Yang; Sheng-Chieh Huang; Shih-Ching Chang; Huann-Sheng Wang; Shung-Haur Yang; Wei-Shone Chen; Yuan-Tzu Lan; Chun-Chi Lin; Hung-Hsin Lin; Jeng-Kai Jiang
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.