Literature DB >> 27438135

EX VIVO COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGY VARIATIONS IN EQUINE CERVICAL VERTEBRAE.

Stefanie Veraa1, Wilhelmina Bergmann2, Antoon-Jan van den Belt3, Inge Wijnberg4, Willem Back4,5.   

Abstract

Diagnostic imaging is one of the pillars in the clinical workup of horses with clinical signs of cervical spinal disease. An improved awareness of morphologic variations in equine cervical vertebrae would be helpful for interpreting findings. The aim of this anatomic study was to describe CT variations in left-right symmetry and morphology of the cervical and cervicothoracic vertebrae in a sample of horses. Postmortem CT examinations of the cervical spine for horses without congenital growth disorders were prospectively and retrospectively recruited. A total of 78 horses (27 foals, 51 mature horses) were evaluated. Twenty-six horses (33.3%) had homologous changes in which a transposition of the caudal part of the transverse process (caudal ventral tubercle) of C6 toward the ventral aspect of the transverse process of C7 was present (n = 10 bilateral, n = 12 unilateral left-sided, n = 4 unilateral right-sided). There was one horse with occipito-atlantal malformation, two horses with rudimentary first ribs bilaterally, and one horse with bilateral transverse processes at Th1, representing homeotic (transitional) vertebral changes. Chi-square tests identified no significant differences in the number of conformational variations between the group of mature horses with or without clinical signs (P = 0.81) or between the group of mature horses and the group of foals (P = 0.72). Findings indicated that, in this sample of horses, the most frequently identified variations were homologous variations (transposition of the caudal part of the transverse process of C6-C7) in the caudal equine cervical vertebral column. Homeotic (transitional) variations at the cervicothoracic vertebral column were less common.
© 2016 American College of Veterinary Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical vertebral column; homeotic; homologous; horse; transitional vertebra

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27438135     DOI: 10.1111/vru.12393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound        ISSN: 1058-8183            Impact factor:   1.363


  7 in total

1.  An objective index for spinal cord compression on computed tomography in Thoroughbred horses.

Authors:  Taro Kondo; Fumio Sato; Nao Tsuzuki; Chun-Jen Chen; Kazutaka Yamada
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2022-02-13

2.  Characterization of bony changes localized to the cervical articular processes in a mixed population of horses.

Authors:  Kevin K Haussler; Roy R Pool; Hilary M Clayton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Equine cervical intervertebral disc degeneration is associated with location and MRI features.

Authors:  Stefanie Veraa; Wilhelmina Bergmann; Inge D Wijnberg; Willem Back; Hans Vernooij; Mirjam Nielen; Antoon-Jan M van den Belt
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2019-07-28       Impact factor: 1.363

4.  Caudal cervical vertebral morphological variation is not associated with clinical signs in Warmblood horses.

Authors:  S Veraa; K de Graaf; I D Wijnberg; W Back; H Vernooij; M Nielen; A J M Belt
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.888

Review 5.  Equine Cervical Pain and Dysfunction: Pathology, Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Melinda R Story; Kevin K Haussler; Yvette S Nout-Lomas; Tawfik A Aboellail; Christopher E Kawcak; Myra F Barrett; David D Frisbie; C Wayne McIlwraith
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  A Radiographic Technique for Assessment of Morphologic Variations of the Equine Caudal Cervical Spine.

Authors:  Christine Gee; Alison Small; Kathleen Shorter; Wendy Y Brown
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  A comparative study of breed differences in the anatomical configuration of the equine vertebral column.

Authors:  Tijn Jan Pieter Spoormakers; Stefanie Veraa; Elisabeth Anna Maria Graat; Paul René van Weeren; Harold Brommer
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 2.610

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.