Literature DB >> 27438077

The Portuguese Experience with Ocriplasmin in Clinical Practice.

João Figueira1, David Martins, Bernardete Pessoa, Natália Ferreira, Angelina Meireles, António Sampaio, Ângela Carneiro, Fernanda Vaz, João Nascimento, Natacha Moreno, José Roque, Manuel Domingues, Rita Flores, Carla Teixeira, Eduardo Conde, Filipe Henriques, Helena Proença, José Pita Negrão, Marisa Barbosa, Rufino Silva, Sara Vaz-Pereira, Pedro Pereira Neves, Nuno Gomes, Miguel Raimundo.   

Abstract

AIM: Evaluate the real-life experience with ocriplasmin on vitreomacular traction (VMT) release and full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) closure in Portugal.
METHODS: Multicentric, retrospective study of 83 eyes of 78 patients who were treated with intravitreal ocriplasmin for VMT with and without FTMH. Primary outcomes were VMT release and FTMH closure. Secondary outcomes included visual acuity changes and structural features on spectral-domain ocular coherence tomography.
RESULTS: VMT resolved in 47 of the 83 eyes (56.6%) and 6 of the 12 FTMH were closed (50.0%). Mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from 65.1 at baseline to 70.8 ETDRS letters at the end of follow-up (p < 0.0001) with a mean follow-up of 138.8 days. Improvement in BCVA was significantly better in eyes with VMT release (p = 0.021). Approximately 73% of patients had normal ellipsoid zone integrity at the end of follow-up, 87% had no neurosensorial detachment and 40% had no intra- or subretinal fluid.
CONCLUSION: VMT release and FTMH closure were achieved in more than half of the treated eyes and were correlated with significant BCVA improvements and favorable baseline characteristics. In fact, if a careful patient selection is carried out, VMT resolution with ocriplasmin can be optimized, tailoring the best approach to each patient.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27438077     DOI: 10.1159/000446842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Res        ISSN: 0030-3747            Impact factor:   2.892


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of intravitreal ocriplasmin treatment for vitreomacular traction in clinical practice.

Authors:  Ricarda G Schumann; Julian Langer; Denise Compera; Katharina Luedtke; Markus M Schaumberger; Thomas Kreutzer; Wolfgang J Mayer; Armin Wolf; Siegfried G Priglinger
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Enzymatic vitreolysis for the treatment of tractional diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  Bernardete Pessoa; João Coelho; Constança Coelho; Sílvia Monteiro; Carolina Abreu; João Figueira; Angelina Meireles; João Nuno Melo Beirão
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-22

3.  Effectiveness of ocriplasmin in real-world settings: A systematic literature review, meta-analysis, and comparison with randomized trials.

Authors:  Arshad M Khanani; Ryan N Constantine; Koenraad H Blot; Benedicte Lescrauwaet; Peter Szurman
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 3.761

4.  ASSESSMENT OF ANATOMICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES WITH OCRIPLASMIN TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH VITREOMACULAR TRACTION WITH OR WITHOUT MACULAR HOLES: Results of OVIID-1 Trial.

Authors:  Ramin Tadayoni; Frank G Holz; Christophe Zech; Xin Liu; Claudio Spera; Peter Stalmans
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  OCRIPLASMIN FOR VITREOMACULAR TRACTION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE: The INJECT Study.

Authors:  David H W Steel; Niall Patton; Theodor Stappler; Niral Karia; Hans Hoerauf; Nishal Patel; Joachim Wachtlin; Thomas Raber; Petra Kozma-Wiebe
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.975

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.