Two 1-(4-aryl-5-alkyl-pyridin-2-yl)-3-methylurea glucokinase activators were identified with robust in vivo efficacy. These two compounds possessed higher solubilities than the previously identified triaryl compounds (i.e., AM-2394). Structure-activity relationship studies are presented along with relevant pharmacokinetic and in vivo data.
Two 1-(4-aryl-5-alkyl-pyridin-2-yl)-3-methylureaglucokinase activators were identified with robust in vivo efficacy. These two compounds possessed higher solubilities than the previously identified triaryl compounds (i.e., AM-2394). Structure-activity relationship studies are presented along with relevant pharmacokinetic and in vivo data.
Entities:
Keywords:
GKA; Type 2 diabetes; glucokinase activator; methylurea-substituted pyridines
Glucokinase
(GK) is a hexokinase isozyme that phosphorylates glucose in the presence
of ATP to generate glucose-6-phosphate. It is expressed predominantly
in the liver, pancreas, brain, and enterocytes.[1] In the pancreas, it is the rate-limiting step in glucose
metabolism and thus controls glucose-stimulated insulin secretion.
In the liver, it regulates the rate of glucose metabolism and glycogen
synthesis. Human genetic mutations in GK underscore the important
role this enzyme plays in maintaining proper glucose homeostasis.
Loss of function mutations cause maturity-onset diabetes of the young
type 2 and gain of function mutations cause hyperinsulinemia and hypoglycemia.[2]Because glucokinase controls key steps
regulating glucose homeostasis, it has been the focus of considerable
attention as a potential target for treating type 2 diabetes. In 2003,
Grimsby et al. published the first report of a synthetic small molecule
activator of glucokinase.[3] The compound,
referred to as a GK activator (GKA), binds to a site separate (i.e.,
allosteric) from the glucose binding site and increases both the affinity
of the enzyme for glucose and the maximal velocity. Consequently,
activator-bound GK is active at lower glucose concentrations and,
when administered to animals, improves plasma glucose levels in both
fasting states and following an oral glucose challenge. Several GKAs
have advanced to clinical trials, and although robust glucose lowering
efficacy has been observed, potential liabilities have also been documented,
including hypoglycemia, elevated triglycerides, and blood pressure.[4−6]The present report details our efforts to develop novel GKAs
for treating type 2 diabetes. Three kinetic parameters were used to
characterize our GKAs. The S0.5 is the
affinity of the enzyme for glucose, approximately 8 mM in the absence
of activator. The maximal velocity, or Vmax, is the rate of glucose phosphorylation at saturating glucose concentrations,
defined as 100% in the absence of activator. We also measured the
EC50 of the activator in the presence of 5 mM glucose.
In addition, the EC50 assay was run in the presence of
human serum albumin (HSA, 4% final concentration), and the shift in
the EC50 was compared to the value in the absence of HSA.
The resulting comparison was used as a functional measure of protein
binding.As described previously in Dransfield et al.,[7] the identification of AM-2394 (1) provided a molecule with good potency and in vivo efficacy in various rodent glucose models, however, with poor to
moderate solubility (Figure ). Solubility issues for this compound were believed to be
detrimental for further development of this molecule as an orally
administered drug. Our goal for the current work was to maintain the
favorable potency and kinetic parameters (EC50, S0.5, and Vmax) of AM-2394 (1) while increasing the solubility of
the GKAs for further development. The kinetic parameters of AM-2394
were selected to deliver an acceptable balance between efficacy and
risk of hypoglycemia, a known potential side effect of GKAs.[1]
Figure 1
Properties of AM-2394 (1).
Properties of AM-2394 (1).We hypothesized that decreasing
the number of aromatic rings might improve solubility by disrupting
the packing in the crystal lattice of the compounds.[8] Previous structure-guided studies[9] showed that the protein pocket in which the C5-alkoxypyridine binds
is very flexible, accommodating both small and large groups. We anticipated
that a variety of modifications to the C5-alkoxypyridine of AM-2394 (1) would be tolerated. We thus focused
our SAR efforts on exploring this region of the molecule, incorporating
various alkyl groups to replace the C5 alkoxypyridine to impart desired
physicochemical properties into the GKA molecules. Factors such as
molecular weight (<500) and log P of these molecules are generally
within acceptable range of oral drugs, so the reduction of aromaticity
was the focus to improve solubility of these molecules.[8,10]The syntheses of some of the key compounds are shown in Schemes –3 and also outlined in the previous manuscript.[7] (Z)-1-Ethoxy-2-(tributylstannyl)ethene
was coupled to bromo methylurea 2c to provide the ethoxyvinyl
urea compound 2d. Then acid-mediated hydrolysis of the
ethoxyvinyl moiety followed by sodium borohydride reduction led to
the primary alcohol 2 (Scheme ).
Scheme 1
Reagents and conditions:
(a) Pd(PPh3)4, (Z)-1-ethoxy-2-(tributylstannyl)ethene,
toluene, 80%; (b) 4 N HCl(aq), THF; (c) NaBH4, MeOH, 35%.
Scheme 3
Reagents and conditions:
(a) 2-(5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane,
Pd2dba3, PCy3, K3PO4, dioxane, 51%; (b) H2, Pd/C, MeOH, EtOAc, SFC
chromatography (see Supporting Information for conditions), 32%.
Reagents and conditions:
(a) Pd(PPh3)4, (Z)-1-ethoxy-2-(tributylstannyl)ethene,
toluene, 80%; (b) 4 N HCl(aq), THF; (c) NaBH4, MeOH, 35%.Synthesis of compound 7 (Scheme ) started from the lithiation of bromo methylurea 2c. Addition of the lithiated intermediate to 3-(benzyloxy)cyclobutanone
generated intermediate 7a, which was hydrogenated under
acidic conditions to provide 7 as a single isomer. Compound 7 has a cis relationship between the hydroxyl
group and the aromatic substitution on the cyclobutane ring, which
was confirmed through a NOESY experiment.
Reagents
and conditions: (a) MeLi, n-BuLi, 3-(benzyloxy)cyclobutanone,
THF, 26%; (b) 10% MeSO3H, EtOH, MeOH, Pd/C, H2, 3 days, 77%.Reagents and conditions:
(a) 2-(5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane,
Pd2dba3, PCy3, K3PO4, dioxane, 51%; (b) H2, Pd/C, MeOH, EtOAc, SFC
chromatography (see Supporting Information for conditions), 32%.Suzuki coupling of
bromo methylurea 17a with 2-(5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane generated compound 20. It was hydrogenated to produce compound 21 after SFC chiral chromatography.Table describes the SAR of some of the acyclic
alkyl groups substituted at the 5-position of the methylurea pyridine.
Despite the generally low S0.5 values
of these compounds, changing from the bulkier aromatic substitution
at C5 to small alkyl alcohol and ethers, generally produced analogues
with excellent potency. The exception was the more highly alpha-substituted
compound 5 that lost approximately 5-fold in potency.
These compounds do not have much potency shift (one to 3-fold) in
the presence of 4% HSA, indicating that these compounds are not highly
protein-bound. Compounds 3 and 5 also have
similar Vmax as AM-2394.
Furthermore, both alcohols (2–4)
and ethers (6) exhibited much improved (approximately
10-fold increase) solubility in PBS buffer (pH 7.4) over AM-2394.
Table 1
Exploration of the Acyclic Groups at the 5-Position
The estimated coefficients
of variation for the EC50, S0.5, and Vmax are 30% (n = 383), 17% (n = 297), and 4% (n = 329), respectively, based on the performance of a reference compound.
Also, human recombinant GK was used in all the assays.
Sol: solubility in PBS buffer at pH
7.4.
The estimated coefficients
of variation for the EC50, S0.5, and Vmax are 30% (n = 383), 17% (n = 297), and 4% (n = 329), respectively, based on the performance of a reference compound.
Also, human recombinant GK was used in all the assays.Sol: solubility in PBS buffer at pH
7.4.This prompted us to
explore additional C5 alkyl alcohols and ethers toward identifying
analogues with a higher S0.5 to reduce
hypoglycemia risk while maintaining similar potency and Vmax as AM-2394. An exercise to constrain
the alcohols from Table into a ring is shown in Table . Compound 7 showed a more desirable S0.5 of 0.66 and an excellent Vmax of 0.97 while having good potency. Its trans isomer 8 showed improved potency but a lower S0.5 of 0.55. A couple of analogues of 7 (compounds 9–11) were synthesized
to see if further improvement in the kinetic parameters could be achieved.
However, all of them showed lower Vmax values. A second hydroxyl substitution at the benzylic position
(12) decreased the potency dramatically. We then moved
to synthesizing alcohols with different ring sizes. Compound 13, with a cyclopropyl methyl alcohol, also had a similar Vmax and potency to 7. However,
the S0.5 was less favorable. Dimethyl
substitution at the carbon alpha to hydroxyl group (14) resulted in a decrease in Vmax ratio
as in previous analogues (10 vs 9). The
five- and six-membered ring alcohols (15, 16) have similar potency and Vmax values
as those of 7; however, both had less satisfactory S0.5 values.
Table 2
Exploration of the
Cyclic Group at the 5-Position
The estimated coefficients of variation for the
EC50, S0.5, and Vmax are 30% (n = 383), 17% (n = 297), and 4% (n = 329), respectively, based on
the performance of a reference compound. Also, human recombinant GK
was used in all the assays
The estimated coefficients of variation for the
EC50, S0.5, and Vmax are 30% (n = 383), 17% (n = 297), and 4% (n = 329), respectively, based on
the performance of a reference compound. Also, human recombinant GK
was used in all the assaysCompound 7 has very good solubility in PBS buffer (332
μM, pH 7.4) and low plasma protein binding (32% Fu in rat, 9.4%
in mouse, and 25% in human). In addition, 7 had low intrinsic
clearance in rat and human liver microsomes (24 μL/(min·mg)
and <14 μL(min·mg), respectively). Compound 7 also demonstrated moderate clearance in vivo in
mice and rats (0.87 and 1.3L/h/kg, respectively) and good oral bioavailability
(F = 20% and 39%) (Table ). Based on its overall favorable biochemical,
physiochemical, and pharmacokinetic profiles, compound 7 was tested in the ob/ob mousediabetic model. When evaluated at
doses 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg, compound 7 demonstrated a
dose-proportional decrease in blood glucose levels during an oral
glucose tolerance test, with a 32% OGTT-AUC reduction at 30 mg/kg
(Figure ).
Table 4
Pharmacokinetic Properties of 7 and 21 (AM-9074)
IVa
POa
compd
species
CL (L/h/kg)
Vss (L/kg)
t1/2 (h)
F (%)
AUC (μM·h)
1
rat
1.8
2.7
2.3
60
2.70
7
rat
1.3
1.2
3.0
39
1.84
21
rat
1.7
0.66
0.3
20
3.64
7
mouse
0.87
0.65
1.2
20
3.69
21
mouse
9.4
3.3
0.3
5
0.13
Rat IV dose: 0.5 mg/kg in 100% DMSO, n = 3; PO
dose: 2.0 mg/kg in 98.5% water, 1% Tween 80, 0.5% methyl cellulose, n = 3. Mouse IV dose: 1.0 mg/kg in 100% DMSO, n = 3; PO dose: 5.0 mg/kg in 49.55% water, 30% propylene glycol 10%
ethanol, 10% dimethylacetamide, 0.45% NaCl, n = 3.
Figure 2
In
vivo results of dosing compound (7) in a diabetes
model in mice. Statistical significance compared to vehicle treatment
is denoted by *(p < 0.05), **(p < 0.01), ***(p < 0.001), and ****(p < 0.0001), as determined by two-way ANOVA, and is color-coded
to the treatment in the figure legends.
In
vivo results of dosing compound (7) in a diabetes
model in mice. Statistical significance compared to vehicle treatment
is denoted by *(p < 0.05), **(p < 0.01), ***(p < 0.001), and ****(p < 0.0001), as determined by two-way ANOVA, and is color-coded
to the treatment in the figure legends.We continued to explore structural diversity at C5 by investigating
cyclic ether substitutions (Table ). A 3-methoxypyridine instead of a 3-methylpyridine
at the C4 pyridine position was used due to interchangeability and
a slight improvement of potency and kinetics described in our previous
manuscript.[7] An initial THF analogue 17 had good Vmax and potency but
low S0.5. The 4-DHP analogue 18 had a significant boost in S0.5 and
favorable potency and Vmax. The 3-DHP
analogue 20 also had a favorable kinetic profile. Both
compounds were not pursued further because of their lack of in vivo efficacy. This was due to their high IV clearance
in rodents that did not enable a durable response over an appropriate
time course of an experiment.
Table 3
Exploration of the
Cyclic Ether Group at the 5-Position
The estimated coefficients of variation for the
EC50, S0.5, and Vmax are 30% (n = 383), 17% (n = 297), and 4% (n = 329), respectively, based on
the performance of a reference compound. Also, human recombinant GK
was used in all the assays.
Rat IV dose: 0.5 mg/kg, n = 3.
Racemic, a pair of cis isomers; in addition, all
stereochemistry was assigned arbitrarily.
The estimated coefficients of variation for the
EC50, S0.5, and Vmax are 30% (n = 383), 17% (n = 297), and 4% (n = 329), respectively, based on
the performance of a reference compound. Also, human recombinant GK
was used in all the assays.Rat IV dose: 0.5 mg/kg, n = 3.Racemic, a pair of cis isomers; in addition, all
stereochemistry was assigned arbitrarily.Similar to 7, compound 21 has low plasma protein binding (28% Fu in rat, 14% in mouse, and
16% in human) and good solubility in PBS buffer (303 μM, pH
7.4). Compound 21 had high in vivo clearance
in mouse but moderate clearance and acceptable oral bioavailability
in rat (Table ). Metabolic identification studies were
performed on 21 that identified the THP ring as one site
of oxidation (see Supporting Information). Additional modifications on the 3-THP ring, such as increasing
polarity or addition of electron-withdrawing groups (23, 24, 25, and 26), were made
to potentially lower the clearance further by possibly blocking this
metabolic pathway. These tended to adversely impact potency, although
not in the case of compound 25. However, as 25 did not show improved in vivo clearance, it was
not pursued further. The 4-THP analogue (compound 19)
of compound 21 also had higher in vivo clearance.Rat IV dose: 0.5 mg/kg in 100% DMSO, n = 3; PO
dose: 2.0 mg/kg in 98.5% water, 1% Tween 80, 0.5% methyl cellulose, n = 3. Mouse IV dose: 1.0 mg/kg in 100% DMSO, n = 3; PO dose: 5.0 mg/kg in 49.55% water, 30% propylene glycol 10%
ethanol, 10% dimethylacetamide, 0.45% NaCl, n = 3.The ability of compound 21 (AM-9074) to lower fed blood glucose levels
was tested in male Sprague–Dawley rats. When evaluated at doses
3, 10, 30, and 100 mg/kg, compound 21 demonstrated a
dose-proportional decrease in blood glucose levels during a glucose
tolerance test, with a 40% reduction in AUC at 100 mg/kg (Figure ).
Figure 3
(top) AM-9074 fed blood glucose levels. (bottom) In vivo results
of dosing compound AM-9074 (21) in normal
rat model. Statistical significance compared to vehicle treatment
is denoted by *(p < 0.05), **(p < 0.01), and ***(p < 0.001), as determined
by ANOVA, and is color-coded to the treatment in the figure legends.
(top) AM-9074 fed blood glucose levels. (bottom) In vivo results
of dosing compound AM-9074 (21) in normal
rat model. Statistical significance compared to vehicle treatment
is denoted by *(p < 0.05), **(p < 0.01), and ***(p < 0.001), as determined
by ANOVA, and is color-coded to the treatment in the figure legends.In conclusion, through systematic
exploration of acyclic and cyclic alcohol and ether substitutions
at the C5 position, we have identified multiple compounds with improved
solubility compared to AM-2394, while maintaining similar
potency and kinetic parameters. This increase in solubility should
aid in the drug development of this GKA class of urea compounds,[11] including the ability to achieve high exposures in vivo with maximal dosing across several species. Compounds 7 and 21 (AM-9074) exhibited acceptable
clearance and oral bioavailability in rodents and effectively lowered
plasma glucose levels in the appropriate model studies.
Authors: Ronald J Hinklin; Steven A Boyd; Mark J Chicarelli; Kevin R Condroski; Walter E DeWolf; Patrice A Lee; Waiman Lee; Ajay Singh; Laurie Thomas; Walter C Voegtli; Lance Williams; Thomas D Aicher Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2013-09-25 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Paul J Dransfield; Vatee Pattaropong; Sujen Lai; Zice Fu; Todd J Kohn; Xiaohui Du; Alan Cheng; Yumei Xiong; Renee Komorowski; Lixia Jin; Marion Conn; Eric Tien; Walter E DeWolf; Ronald J Hinklin; Thomas D Aicher; Christopher F Kraser; Steven A Boyd; Walter C Voegtli; Kevin R Condroski; Murielle Veniant-Ellison; Julio C Medina; Jonathan Houze; Peter Coward Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 4.345
Authors: Riccardo C Bonadonna; Tim Heise; Christophe Arbet-Engels; Christoph Kapitza; Angelo Avogaro; Joe Grimsby; Jay Zhi; Joseph F Grippo; Raffaella Balena Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-08-25 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Joseph Grimsby; Ramakanth Sarabu; Wendy L Corbett; Nancy-Ellen Haynes; Fred T Bizzarro; John W Coffey; Kevin R Guertin; Darryl W Hilliard; Robert F Kester; Paige E Mahaney; Linda Marcus; Lida Qi; Cheryl L Spence; John Tengi; Mark A Magnuson; Chang An Chu; Mark T Dvorozniak; Franz M Matschinsky; Joseph F Grippo Journal: Science Date: 2003-07-18 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Gary E Meininger; Russell Scott; Maria Alba; Yue Shentu; Edmund Luo; Himal Amin; Michael J Davies; Keith D Kaufman; Barry J Goldstein Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 19.112