| Literature DB >> 27436956 |
Bettina Faehnrich1, Sarah Wagner1, Chlodwig Franz1.
Abstract
Self-incompatible (SI) plants are able to form ideal mother lines for hybrid crossing in hermaphroditic plants, assuring fertilization from the desired father line. To find out suitable ways to maintain SI was the aim of this study. Among 220 plants of German chamomile (Matricaria recutita (L.) Rauschert) within six accessions SI-genotypes were selected. SI was determined as staying seedless in three flower heads per plant. Initial SI-plants formed the basic paternal generation (P1) of i) maintaining the same genotypes over six months and repeating seed set analysis (P2) and of ii) conducting crossings in three versions (SI × SI, SI × NSI (not SI evaluated plants) and NSI × SI), thereby producing the F1 population. F1 exhibited 78% SI and P2 62% SI, indicating a higher environmental than genetic influence on SI. But heritability, calculated from the results of SI × SI crossings, showed high values (h(2) = 0.71). Within generative propagation, the influence of generation/crossing version was highly significant (p = 0.001) and the cultivar 'Degumille' explored the highest value of SI (86%) after SI × NSI crossings. Therefore, the intra-cultivar combination of 'Degumille' SI mother plants crossed with NSI father plants can be recommended as the most promising version to maintain SI in chamomile.Entities:
Keywords: Matricaria recutita; breeding tool; chamomile; heritability; hybrid crossing; mother lines; self-incompatibility
Year: 2016 PMID: 27436956 PMCID: PMC4902458 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.15133
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
Total number of plants in the starting population and number of evaluated plants in each other determined population of the trial (N). Mean values of SI-development (SI = 1.00, non SI = 0.00 per plant), standard deviation (SD) of all mean values in all determined populations, separated by variety. Missing values indicate that there are no evaluable plants available in the respective group
| Starting population | P1 | P2 | F1 after SI × SI | F1 after SI × NSI | F1 after NSI × SI | F1 total | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
| Variety | N | Mean | SD | N | Mean | SD | N | Mean | SD | N | Mean | SD | N | Mean | SD | N | Mean | SD | N | Mean | SD |
| LUT | 40 | 0.20 | 0.41 | 7 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 3 | 0.33 | 0.58 | 0 | 2 | 0.50 | 0.71 | 5 | 0.40 | 0.55 | ||||
| HUN 1 | 49 | 0.36 | 0.50 | 14 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 6 | 0.50 | 0.55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| USA | 41 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
| GER | 40 | 0.38 | 0.52 | 1 | 1.00 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 1 | 1.00 | 3 | 0.33 | 0.58 | 4 | 0.50 | 0.58 | ||||
| DEG | 40 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 38 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 16 | 0.75 | 0.45 | 68 | 0.82 | 0.38 | 35 | 0.86 | 0.36 | 31 | 0.71 | 0.46 | 134 | 0.81 | 0.40 |
| PRO | 10 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 1 | 1.00 | 2 | 0.50 | 0.71 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
| Total | 220 | 0.31 | 0.46 | 61 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 26 | 0.62 | 0.50 | 71 | 0.80 | 0.40 | 36 | 0.86 | 0.35 | 36 | 0.67 | 0.48 | 143 | 0.78 | 0.41 |
Different letters indicate significant differences at probability error level α = 0.05 between P1 and P2.
Different letters indicate significant differences at probability error level α = 0.05 between P1 and crossing versions of F1.
Different letters indicate significant differences at probability error level α = 0.05 between P1 and F1 total.
Different letters indicate significant differences at probability error level α = 0.05 between P1 and F1 crossing versions in ‘Degumille’ (DEG).
P-values after two way univariat analyses of variance for the influence of generation/crossing/environment, cultivar and interactions, respectively, on the occurrence of self-incompatibility (SI) in the relevant populations (databases)
| Factor of influence | P1 + P2 | P1 + F1 crossing versions | P1 + F1 total | P2 + F1 total | F1 crossing versions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation/crossing/environment | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.143 | 0.257 |
| Cultivar | 0.064 | 0.606 | 0.282 | 0.014 | 0.345 |
| Interactions | 0.057 | 0.207 | 0.126 | 0.241 | 0.416 |
Significant at a level of error probability of α = 0.05.
Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc tests for SI development of cultivars over P1 and P2. Mean values of homogenous groups in subgroups are displayed, α = 0.05. Value 1.00 indicates 100% SI of the respective group, value 0.00 indicates 0.00% SI
| Cultivar | N | Subgroups | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| 1 | 2 | ||
| GER | 3 | 0.33 | |
| PRO | 3 | 0.67 | |
| HUN 1 | 20 | 0.85 | |
| DEG | 54 | 0.93 | |
| LUT | 7 | 1.00 | |
Results of chi-square-tests (Pearson), displaying asymptotic significance (p-value) and chi-square-value (χ2-value) to reveal differences of observed and expected SI distribution in respective populations
| Observed distribution of SI in | Against the expectation of | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 100% SI (P1) | Mean values of F1 total (78% SI, 22% non SI) | |||
|
|
| |||
| P-value | χ2-value | P-value | χ2-value | |
| F1 after SI × SI | <0.001 | 168371.89 | ||
| F1 after SI × NSI | <0.001 | 42352.50 | 0.115 | 4.327 |
| F1 after NSI × SI | <0.001 | 243984.00 | ||
| P2 | <0.001 | 2346141.54 | 0.066 | 3.373 |
Significant at a level of error probability of α = 0.05.
Fig. 1Number of self-incompatible (SI) plants and non SI plants in the respective generation/crossing version. Included p-value refers to results of two-way analysis of variance for the influence of generation/crossing version on SI development.