| Literature DB >> 27436953 |
Mitsukazu Sakata1, Mari Seno1, Hiroaki Matsusaka1, Kiyomi Takahashi1, Yuki Nakamura1, Yoshiyuki Yamagata1, Enrique R Angeles2, Toshihiro Mochizuki1, Toshihiro Kumamaru1, Masao Sato1, Akiko Enomoto1, Kosuke Tashiro1, Satoru Kuhara1, Hikaru Satoh1, Atsushi Yoshimura1.
Abstract
Rice bran oil is a byproduct of the milling of rice (Oryza sativa L.). It offers various health benefits and has a beneficial fatty acid composition. To increase the amount of rice bran as a sink for triacylglycerol (TAG), we developed and characterized new breeding materials with giant embryos. To induce mutants, we treated fertilized egg cells of the high-yielding cultivar 'Mizuhochikara' with N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU). By screening M2 seeds, we isolated four giant embryo mutant lines. Genetic analysis revealed that the causative loci in lines MGE12 and MGE13 were allelic to giant embryo (ge) on chromosome 7, and had base changes in the causal gene Os07g0603700. On the other hand, the causative loci in lines MGE8 and MGE14 were not allelic to ge, and both were newly mapped on chromosome 3. The TAG contents of all four mutant lines increased relative to their wild type, 'Mizuhochikara'. MGE13 was agronomically similar to 'Mizuhochikara' and would be useful for breeding for improved oil content.Entities:
Keywords: N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU); giant embryo; mutant; rice bran oil; triacylglycerol (TAG)
Year: 2016 PMID: 27436953 PMCID: PMC4902460 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.15135
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
Fig. 1Breeding scheme for the development of giant embryo mutant lines and materials used for genetic analysis.
Fig. 2Phenotypes of giant embryo mutant lines. (A–E) Plant types of ‘Mizuhochikara’ and four giant embryo mutant lines in the F3 generation. Scale bars = 50 cm. (F–J) Brown rice of ‘Mizuhochikara’ and mutant lines in the F4 generation. Scale bars = 5 mm. (K–O) Cross-sections of ‘Mizuhochikara’ and mutant seeds in the F4 generation. Scale bars = 5 mm.
Embryo size in F4 seeds of giant embryo mutant lines
| Line | Embryo length (mm) | Embryo width (mm) | Embryo area (mm2) | Seed area (mm2) | Embryo ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGE8 | 2.36 ± 0.04 | 1.16 ± 0.03 | 2.07 ± 0.08 | 14.63 ± 0.26ns | 14.2 ± 0.4 |
| MGE12 | 2.57 ± 0.05 | 1.14 ± 0.03 | 2.11 ± 0.09 | 14.55 ± 0.25ns | 14.5 ± 0.5 |
| MGE13 | 2.61 ± 0.08 | 1.15 ± 0.03 | 2.13 ± 0.12 | 14.64 ± 0.44ns | 14.5 ± 0.6 |
| MGE14 | 2.54 ± 0.08 | 1.15 ± 0.02 | 2.15 ± 0.10 | 14.75 ± 0.27ns | 14.5 ± 0.5 |
|
| |||||
| Mizuhochikara | 2.10 ± 0.06 | 0.90 ± 0.04 | 1.41 ± 0.08 | 14.92 ± 0.31 | 9.4 ± 0.4 |
Values are means ± SD of 5 replicates of about 10 seeds each. Dunnett’s test was performed for each trait using ‘Mizuhochikara’ as the reference.
P < 0.01;
‘ns’, not significant at P = 0.05%.
Embryo ratio = embryo area/seed area.
Allelic testing of giant embryo mutant lines
| Cross combination | Embryo phenotype of F1 seeds | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Female | Male | |
| EM40 | MGE8 | Normal |
| EM40 | MGE12 | Giant embryo |
| EM40 | MGE13 | Giant embryo |
| EM40 | MGE14 | Normal |
|
| ||
| MGE8 | EM40 | – |
| MGE12 | EM40 | Giant embryo |
| MGE13 | EM40 | Giant embryo |
| MGE14 | EM40 | Intermediate size |
|
| ||
| MGE12 | MGE13 | Giant embryo |
| MGE13 | MGE12 | Giant embryo |
|
| ||
| MGE8 | MGE14 | Intermediate size |
| MGE14 | MGE8 | Intermediate size |
Fig. 3Mutations in Os07g0603700 of EM40, MGE12, and MGE13. Boxes show base changes relative to ‘Nipponbare’ reference sequence.
Fig. 4Linkage maps of (A) ge(MGE8) and (B) ge(MGE14) on chromosome 3.
TAG contents of each tissue in M4 seeds of giant embryo mutant lines
| Line | TAG contents of each tissue (mg/50 seeds) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Embryo | Aleurone | Endosperm | Rice bran | Brown rice | |
| MGE8 | 5.3 ± 0.7ns | 9.6 ± 0.6ns | 3.2 ± 0.2ns | 14.9 ± 0.3ns | 18.1 ± 0.1 |
| MGE12 | 10.9 ± 0.2 | 11.7 ± 1.0 | 3.0 ± 0.1ns | 22.5 ± 1.2 | 25.6 ± 1.2 |
| MGE13 | 8.8 ± 1.0 | 11.3 ± 0.9 | 3.3 ± 0.4ns | 20.1 ± 1.9 | 23.4 ± 2.2 |
| MGE14 | 11.4 ± 0.5 | 9.8 ± 1.2ns | 3.2 ± 1.5ns | 21.1 ± 0.7 | 24.4 ± 0.8 |
|
| |||||
| Mizuhochikara | 4.1 ± 0.3 | 8.5 ± 0.5 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 12.6 ± 0.8 | 14.9 ± 0.8 |
Values are means ± SD of 3 replicates. Dunnett’s test was performed for TAG contents using ‘Mizuhochikara’ as the reference.
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01;
‘ns’, not significant at P = 0.05%.
Aleurone includes pericarp and seed coat.
Rice bran consists of embryo and aleurone.
Brown rice consists of embryo, aleurone, and endosperm.
Quantity of TAG per gram of tissue in M4 seeds of giant embryo mutant lines
| Line | Quantity of TAG per 1 g of tissue (mg/g) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Embryo | Aleurone | Endosperm | Rice bran | Brown rice | |
| MGE8 | 150.2 ± 7.3 | 89.6 ± 19.0ns | 6.4 ± 0.6 | 103.7 ± 16.3ns | 28.0 ± 1.4 |
| MGE12 | 201.9 ± 17.0ns | 99.5 ± 11.6 | 3.3 ± 0.2ns | 131.7 ± 13.0 | 23.3 ± 1.1 |
| MGE13 | 189.8 ± 11.0ns | 113.1 ± 2.4 | 3.9 ± 0.3ns | 137.3 ± 2.0 | 23.4 ± 1.4 |
| MGE14 | 221.2 ± 17.0ns | 102.7 ± 9.5 | 4.0 ± 2.0ns | 144.0 ± 8.8 | 25.4 ± 1.4 |
|
| |||||
| Mizuhochikara | 194.9 ± 3.6 | 72.8 ± 0.5 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 91.4 ± 1.5 | 12.9 ± 0.4 |
Values are means ± SD of 3 replicates. Dunnett’s test was performed for TAG contents using ‘Mizuhochikara’ as the reference.
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01;
‘ns’, not significant at P = 0.05%.
Aleurone includes pericarp and seed coat.
Rice bran consists of embryo and aleurone.
Brown rice consists of embryo, aleurone, and endosperm.
TAG contents and weight of rice bran in F4 seeds of giant embryo mutant lines
| Line | TAG contents of rice bran in 50 seeds (mg) | Quantity of TAG per g of rice bran | Quantity of TAG per g of brown rice | Weight of rice bran in 50 seeds (g) | Weight of brown rice in 50 seeds (g) | Rice bran/brown rice ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGE8 | 15.6 ± 1.0 | 73.5 ± 4.3 | 22.0 ± 1.2 | 0.213 ± 0.003 | 0.709 ± 0.018 | 30.0 |
| MGE12 | 18.8 ± 0.4 | 141.1 ± 8.2ns | 19.2 ± 0.4 | 0.133 ± 0.006 | 0.978 ± 0.010 | 13.6 |
| MGE13 | 19.7 ± 0.7 | 160.4 ± 3.2 | 19.7 ± 1.2 | 0.123 ± 0.005 | 1.001 ± 0.031 | 12.3 |
| MGE14 | 21.2 ± 0.8 | 166.5 ± 9.6 | 22.2 ± 0.8 | 0.128 ± 0.008 | 0.956 ± 0.029 | 13.4 |
|
| ||||||
| Mizuhochikara | 13.9 ± 0.7 | 132.7 ± 3.6 | 13.0 ± 0.3 | 0.105 ± 0.005 | 1.070 ± 0.035 | 9.8 |
Values are means ± SD of 5 replicates (4 replicates of MGE8). Dunnett’s test was performed using ‘Mizuhochikara’ as the reference.
P < 0.01;
‘ns’, not significant at P = 0.05%.
Calculated as (TAG content of rice bran in 50 seeds)/(weight of rice bran in 50 seeds).
Calculated as (TAG content of rice bran in 50 seeds)/(weight of brown rice in 50 seeds).
Agronomic traits of giant embryo mutant lines in F3 plants
| Line | Plant height (cm) | Culm length (cm) | Panicle length (cm) | No. of panicles/plant | No. of grains/panicle | Fertility (%) | Panicle weight/plant (g) | Yield/plant | Seed length (mm) | Seed width (mm) | Seed thickness (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGE8 | 78.9 ± 1.9ns | 56.1 ± 1.4 | 22.7 ± 0.8 | 10.9 ± 2.5ns | 241.3 ± 31.4 | 85.6 ± 4.3 | 30.7 ± 6.6 | 37.7 ± 4.7ns | 8.13 ± 0.13 | 3.37 ± 0.02ns | 1.95 ± 0.04 |
| MGE12 | 80.3 ± 3.5ns | 58.2 ± 3.1ns | 22.1 ± 1.3 | 10.8 ± 2.0ns | 212.3 ± 34.0ns | 88.5 ± 3.0 | 37.4 ± 8.4ns | 47.4 ± 8.6ns | 7.43 ± 0.09ns | 3.54 ± 0.04 | 2.30 ± 0.03ns |
| MGE13 | 82.7 ± 3.5ns | 62.6 ± 3.0 | 20.1 ± 1.0ns | 10.7 ± 2.0ns | 191.6 ± 30.1ns | 92.8 ± 2.4ns | 38.3 ± 8.4ns | 48.7 ± 8.7ns | 7.42 ± 0.07ns | 3.41 ± 0.04ns | 2.26 ± 0.02ns |
| MGE14 | 74.1 ± 2.8 | 55.7 ± 2.3 | 18.4 ± 0.9 | 9.9 ± 2.2ns | 223.7 ± 24.8 | 90.6 ± 2.9ns | 35.3 ± 9.2ns | 46.6 ± 7.2ns | 7.51 ± 0.09ns | 3.43 ± 0.06ns | 2.16 ± 0.03 |
|
| |||||||||||
| Mizuhochikara | 80.2 ± 3.7 | 59.4 ± 3.3 | 20.8 ± 0.9 | 10.9 ± 1.7 | 199.1 ± 16.6 | 91.2 ± 2.3 | 41.4 ± 8.1 | 44.4 ± 4.9 | 7.50 ± 0.09 | 3.41 ± 0.03 | 2.28 ± 0.04 |
Values are means ± SD. Data in first 7 columns were measured with 10 replicates for giant embryo mutant lines and 30 replicates for ‘Mizuhochikara’. Yield data were calculated from 5 replicates. Seed data were measured with 5 replicates. Dunnett’s test was performed for each trait using ‘Mizuhochikara’ as the reference.
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01;
‘ns’, not significant at P = 0.05%.
Calculated as (No. of panicles/plant) × (No. of grains/panicle) × (Fertility) × (Weight of brown rice in 50 seeds)/50.