| Literature DB >> 27436948 |
Zhijun Tong1, Bingguang Xiao1, Fangchan Jiao1, Dunhuang Fang1, Jianmin Zeng1, Xingfu Wu1, Xuejun Chen1, Jiankang Yang1, Yongping Li1.
Abstract
Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.), particularly flue-cured tobacco, is one of the most economically important nonfood crops and is also an important model system in plant biotechnology. Despite its importance, only limited molecular marker resources are available for genome analysis, genetic mapping, and breeding. Simple sequence repeats (SSR) are one of the most widely-used molecular markers, having significant advantages including that they are generally co-dominant, easy to use, abundant in eukaryotic organisms, and produce highly reproducible results. In this study, based on the genome sequence data of flue-cured tobacco (K326), we developed a total of 13,645 mostly novel SSR markers, which were working in a set of eighteen tobacco varieties of four different types. A mapping population of 213 backcross (BC1) individuals, which were derived from an intra-type cross between two flue-cured tobacco varieties, Y3 and K326, was selected for mapping. Based on the newly developed SSR markers as well as published SSR markers, we constructed a genetic map consisting of 626 SSR loci distributed across 24 linkage groups and covering a total length of 1120.45 cM with an average distance of 1.79 cM between adjacent markers, which is the highest density map of flue-cured tobacco till date.Entities:
Keywords: flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.); genetic map; molecular marker; simple sequence repeats (SSR)
Year: 2016 PMID: 27436948 PMCID: PMC4902457 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.15129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
Tobacco varieties used for testing the variability of tobacco SSR markers
| Name | Type | Origin |
|---|---|---|
| Honghua Dajinyuan | FC | China |
| Y3 | FC | Zimbabwe |
| KRK26 | FC | Zimbabwe |
| K326 | FC | USA |
| Yunyan2 | FC | China |
| Yunyan85 | FC | China |
| Yunyan87 | FC | China |
| Yunyan97 | FC | China |
| Burley21 | BU | USA |
| Tennessee86 | BU | USA |
| Tennessee90 | BU | USA |
| Kentucky907 | BU | USA |
| Florida301 | CI | USA |
| Beinhart1000 | CI | USA |
| WI | Argentina & Bolivia | |
| WI | Argentina & Bolivia | |
| WI | Argentina & Bolivia | |
| WI | Namibia |
FC: flue-cured tobacco; BU: burley tobacco; CI: cigar tobacco; WI: wild species.
Fig. 1Phylogenetic tree of the 18 tobacco varieties based on the data of 90 SSR polymorphic markers. BU = Burley; FC = Flue-cured; CI = cigar tobacco; WI = wild species.
Fig. 2–7Genetic linkage map of flue-cured tobacco based on a BC1 population (Y3/K326//Y3). The names and positions (cM) of markers in each linkage group are shown on the right and left side, respectively. SSR markers with the bold italic font are the common markers in the two maps constructed by Bindler and this study.
Statistics of the SSR linkage map of flue-cured tobacco constructed in this study
| Linkage groups | Markers number | Length (cM) | Min_Interval (cM) | Max_Interval (cM) | Density (cM/Marker) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Total | PT | TM | |||||
| RK01 | 16 | 1(1) | 15 | 48.81 | 0.39 | 9.66 | 3.05 |
| RK02 | 49 | 4(3) | 45 | 55.13 | 0 | 8.57 | 1.13 |
| RK03 | 14 | 8(5) | 6 | 52.3 | 1.34 | 6.94 | 3.74 |
| RK04 | 20 | 4(4) | 16 | 81.93 | 0.51 | 7.88 | 4.10 |
| RK05 | 7 | 0(0) | 7 | 27.78 | 1.34 | 7.32 | 3.97 |
| RK06 | 12 | 9(6) | 3 | 64.03 | 2.22 | 7.56 | 4.98 |
| RK07 | 48 | 7(7) | 41 | 31.94 | 0 | 2.82 | 0.67 |
| RK08 | 12 | 4(1) | 8 | 36.83 | 1.19 | 5.61 | 3.07 |
| RK09 | 53 | 6(3) | 47 | 56.63 | 0 | 5.54 | 1.07 |
| RK10 | 30 | 6(1) | 24 | 42.33 | 0.01 | 3.45 | 1.41 |
| RK11 | 15 | 6(1) | 9 | 27.48 | 0.08 | 5.07 | 1.83 |
| RK12 | 37 | 6(5) | 31 | 75.03 | 0 | 9.42 | 2.03 |
| RK13 | 53 | 13(5) | 40 | 85.03 | 0.11 | 6.66 | 1.60 |
| RK14 | 46 | 8(3) | 38 | 71.4 | 0 | 8.38 | 1.55 |
| RK15 | 16 | 5(3) | 11 | 40.85 | 0.95 | 6.31 | 2.55 |
| RK16 | 7 | 3(3) | 4 | 26.37 | 1.26 | 6.85 | 3.77 |
| RK17 | 67 | 12(2) | 55 | 56.26 | 0 | 4.44 | 0.84 |
| RK18 | 8 | 5(5) | 3 | 24.12 | 1.24 | 4.99 | 3.02 |
| RK19 | 19 | 10(2) | 9 | 27.33 | 0 | 4.4 | 1.44 |
| RK20 | 12 | 8(3) | 4 | 37.35 | 0 | 8.16 | 3.11 |
| RK21 | 42 | 12(11) | 30 | 58.4 | 0.02 | 8.4 | 1.39 |
| RK22 | 19 | 5(4) | 14 | 41.92 | 0.51 | 4.96 | 2.21 |
| RK23 | 16 | 4(4) | 12 | 32.85 | 0.01 | 7.08 | 2.05 |
| RK24 | 8 | 3(1) | 5 | 18.35 | 0.09 | 5.5 | 2.29 |
| Total | 626 | 149(78) | 477 | 1120.45 | 0 | 9.66 | 1.79 |
Numbers in parentheses indicate that the markers were also mapped in the same linkage group of genetic map constructed by Bindler . SSR marker names begin with the prefix “PT” and “TM” were developed by Bindler and this study, respectively.
Comparison of linkage maps for tobacco
| Cross combination | Population type | Types of markers | No. of markers | Maps length (cM) | No. of groups | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F2 | RFLP | 151 | 1385.6 | 19 | ||
| Speight G-28 × NC2326 (Flue-cured × Flue-cured) | DH | ISSR | 157 | 1838.2 | 27 | |
| Hicks Broad leaf × Red Russian (Flue-cured × Dark tobacco) | F2 | SSR | 286 | 1920 | 24 | |
| Taiyan7 × Burly21 (Flue-cured × Burley) | F2 | SRAP | 112 | 1560.2 | 26 | |
| Burley37 × Burley21 (Burley × Burley) | DH | SRAP/AFLP | 118 | 1953.6 | 22 | |
| F2 | COSII | 489 | 1071 | 12 | ||
| Hicks Broad leaf × Red Russian (Flue-cured × Dark tobacco) | F2 | SSR | 2317 | 3270 | 24 | |
| Hicks Broad leaf × Honghua Dajinyuan (Flue-cured × Flue-cured) | DH | SSR | 611 | 1882.1 | 24 | |
| Hicks Broad leaf × Honghua Dajinyuan (Flue-cured × Flue-cured) | DH | SSR/DArT | 851 | 2291 | 24 | |
| Y3 × K326 (Flue-cured × Flue-cured) | BC1F1 | SSR | 626 | 1120.5 | 24 | This study |
Restriction fragment length polymorphism
Random amplified polymorphic DNA
Inter-simple sequence repeat
Simple sequence repeats
Sequence related amplified polymorphism
Amplified fragment length polymorphism
Conserved orthologous sequences
Diversity arrays technology
Double haploid population