Literature DB >> 27436328

Occupational skin disease among Australian healthcare workers: a retrospective analysis from an occupational dermatology clinic, 1993-2014.

Claire L Higgins1, Amanda M Palmer2, Jennifer L Cahill2, Rosemary L Nixon2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of developing occupational skin disease (OSD).
OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the causes of OSD in Australian HCWs in a tertiary referral clinic.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients assessed at the Occupational Dermatology Clinic in Melbourne from 1993 to 2014.
RESULTS: Of 685 HCWs assessed in the clinic over a period of 22 years, 555 (81.0%) were diagnosed with OSD. The most common diagnosis was irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) (79.1%), followed by allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) (49.7%). Natural rubber latex allergy was also relatively frequent (13.0%). The major substances causing ACD were rubber glove chemicals (thiuram mix and tetraethylthiuram disulfide), preservatives (formaldehyde, formaldehyde releasers, and isothiazolinones), excipients in hand cleansers, which are hard-to-avoid weak allergens, and antiseptics. ACD caused by commercial hand cleansers occurred more frequently than ACD caused by alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHRs). Occupational ICD was mostly caused by water/wet work and hand cleansers, and environmental irritants such as heat and sweating.
CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the causes of OSD in HCWs is important in order to develop strategies for prevention. We suggest that skin care advice should be incorporated into hand hygiene education. The use of ABHRs should be encouraged, weak allergens in skin cleansers should be substituted, and accelerator-free gloves should be recommended for HCWs with OSD.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alcohol-based hand rub; allergic contact dermatitis; contact allergy; hand cleanser; hand wash; irritant contact dermatitis; nurses; patch test; preservatives; rubber chemicals; rubber gloves

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27436328     DOI: 10.1111/cod.12616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  8 in total

1.  Contact dermatitis: Clinical practice findings from a single tertiary referral hospital, a 4-Year retrospective study.

Authors:  Giovanni Sedó-Mejía; Andrés Soto-Rodríguez; Caridad Pino-García; Alfredo Sanabria-Castro; Olga Patricia Monge-Ortega
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.084

2.  Occupational dermatoses among healthcare workers in a hospital center in Portugal.

Authors:  Diana França; Ema Sacadura-Leite; Clara Fernandes-Almeida; Paulo Filipe
Journal:  Rev Bras Med Trab       Date:  2020-04-15

Review 3.  Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  Wolfgang Uter; Thomas Werfel; Ian R White; Jeanne D Johansen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Occupational skin disorders in a subset of Nigerian hairdressers.

Authors:  Joseph Archibong; Eshan Henshaw; Adebola Ogunbiyi; Adekunle George
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2018-10-10

5.  Characteristics of hand eczema in final-year apprentice nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Franka Šakić; Željka Babić; Zrinka Franić; Jelena Macan
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 6.419

6.  Assessment of Hygiene Indicators When Using Gloves by Transport Workers in Russia during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Elena Belova; Ekaterina Shashina; Yury Zhernov; Nadezhda Zabroda; Vitaly Sukhov; Olga Gruzdeva; Tatyana Khodykina; Evgenia Laponova; Valentina Makarova; Anton Simanovsky; Anastasia Zhukova; Tatiana Isiutina-Fedotkova; Denis Shcherbakov; Oleg Mitrokhin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Contact dermatitis.

Authors:  Pamela L Scheinman; Marc Vocanson; Jacob P Thyssen; Jeanne Duus Johansen; Rosemary L Nixon; Kate Dear; Nina C Botto; Johanna Morot; Ari M Goldminz
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 52.329

Review 8.  Time for Re-Evaluating the Human Carcinogenicity of Ethylenedithiocarbamate Fungicides? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Pierluigi Cocco
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.