Literature DB >> 27436194

Balancing mobile-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty in vitro.

Thomas J Heyse1, Joshua Slane2, Geert Peersman2,3, Philipp Dworschak4, Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann4, Lennart Scheys2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Balancing mobile-bearing (MB) unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) is challenging. If performed improperly, potential complications include pain, implant loosening, or progression of osteoarthritis in the preserved compartment. The purpose of this study was to document effects of improper balancing on knee kinematics and joint contact stress. It was hypothesized that over-stuffing would lead to more valgus and higher lateral contact force.
METHODS: Seven fresh-frozen cadaver legs were mounted in a kinematic rig that applied three motion patterns to the specimens: passive flexion-extension, open chain extension, and squatting. During testing, an infrared camera system recorded the trajectories of markers rigidly attached to femur and tibia, while a pressure sensor measured contact pressure in the lateral compartment. Prior computer tomography scans allowed identification of coordinate frames of the bones and calculations of anatomical rotations and translations. Collateral ligament strains were calculated, and quadriceps forces recorded. Following testing on the native knee, a medial MB UKA was implanted in each specimen and all motion trials were repeated. Three inlay thicknesses were tested to simulate optimal balancing as well as under- (1 mm thinner) and over-stuffing (1 mm thicker) of the medial compartment relative to the optimal thickness.
RESULTS: Under-stuffing of the medial compartment leads to kinematics closest to the native knee. Subjectively balanced and over-stuffed MB UKA knees were in more valgus. Lateral peak contact stress was higher from mid- to deep flexion following UKA in all three tested states; however, these results were not significant. Peak strain in the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) was significantly higher in MB UKA, regardless of the inlay thickness mainly in mid-flexion. Inlay thickness had no significant impact on measured quadriceps force during squatting.
CONCLUSION: The results underline the importance of optimal balancing. Over-stuffing should be avoided as it results in the largest kinematic changes relative to the native condition and induces higher strains in the sMCL. Based on the kinematic findings, it is advisable to use thinner inlays, as long as this is not compromising stability or risking inlay luxation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Balancing; Biomechanics; Kinematics; Mobile bearing; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27436194     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4241-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  22 in total

1.  Bootstrap prediction and confidence bands: a superior statistical method for analysis of gait data.

Authors:  M W Lenhoff; T J Santner; J C Otis; M G Peterson; B J Williams; S I Backus
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Lateral tibiofemoral compartment narrowing after medial unicondylar arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew B Collier; Thomas H Eickmann; Kevin K Anbari; Gerard A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee?

Authors:  J Victor; D Van Doninck; L Labey; B Innocenti; P M Parizel; J Bellemans
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  UKA closely preserves natural knee kinematics in vitro.

Authors:  Thomas J Heyse; Bilal F El-Zayat; Ronny De Corte; Yan Chevalier; Lennart Scheys; Bernardo Innocenti; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Luc Labey
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study.

Authors:  S Lewold; O Robertsson; K Knutson; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1998-10

6.  Changes in tibiofemoral contact mechanics following radial split and vertical tears of the medial meniscus an in vitro investigation of the efficacy of arthroscopic repair.

Authors:  M G Muriuki; D A Tuason; B G Tucker; C D Harner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Frontal plane stability following UKA in a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Thomas J Heyse; Scott M Tucker; Yogesh Rajak; Mohammad Kia; Joseph D Lipman; Carl W Imhauser; Geoffrey H Westrich
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee.

Authors:  E S Grood; W J Suntay
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Flexion and extension laxity after medial, mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison between a spacer- and a tension-guided technique.

Authors:  A M ten Ham; P J C Heesterbeek; D B van der Schaaf; W C H Jacobs; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Biomechanical consequences of a tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus. Similar to total meniscectomy.

Authors:  Robert Allaire; Muturi Muriuki; Lars Gilbertson; Christopher D Harner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  11 in total

1.  Kinematics of a bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas J Heyse; Joshua Slane; Geert Peersman; Margo Dirckx; Arne van de Vyver; Philipp Dworschak; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Lennart Scheys
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The challenges of measuring in vivo knee collateral ligament strains using ultrasound.

Authors:  Laura C Slane; Josh A Slane; Jan D'hooge; Lennart Scheys
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Weight-bearing status affects in vivo kinematics following mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kenichi Kono; Hiroshi Inui; Tetsuya Tomita; Takaharu Yamazaki; Shuji Taketomi; Ryota Yamagami; Kohei Kawaguchi; Kazuomi Sugamoto; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Does Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Affect Tibial Bone Strain? A Paired Cadaveric Comparison of Fixed- and Mobile-bearing Designs.

Authors:  Geert Peersman; Orcun Taylan; Joshua Slane; Ben Vanthienen; Jeroen Verhaegen; Lyne Anthonissen; G Harry van Lenthe; Thomas Heyse; Lennart Scheys
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Do Fixed or Mobile Bearing Implants Have Better Survivorship in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Arun Kannan; Peter L Lewis; Chelsea Dyer; William A Jiranek; Stephen McMahon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Robotic arm-assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Exploratory secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M J G Blyth; I Anthony; P Rowe; M S Banger; A MacLean; B Jones
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  Limb position influences component orientation in Oxford mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an experimental cadaveric study.

Authors:  Sachin Tapasvi; Anshu Shekhar; Shantanu Patil; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.853

8.  Robotics improves alignment accuracy and reduces early revision rates for UKA in the hands of low-volume UKA surgeons.

Authors:  Peter Savov; Lars-Rene Tuecking; Henning Windhagen; Tilman Calliess; Max Ettinger
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency versus intactness for outcomes in patients after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weiming Guo; Teng Wan; Haifeng Tan; Gang Fan; Xiaoyu Gao; Pan Liu; Changqing Jiang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-23

10.  Sensor and machine learning-based assessment of gap balancing in cadaveric unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgical training.

Authors:  Xiaowei Sun; Philippe Hernigou; Qidong Zhang; Nianfei Zhang; Weiguo Wang; Yang Chen; Wanshou Guo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.