Sharon A Carstairs1, Leone Ca Craig2, Debbi Marais3, Ourania E Bora4, Kirsty Kiezebrink5. 1. Health Services Research Unit, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. 2. The Rowett Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. 3. Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. 4. Division of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. 5. Division of Applied Health Sciences Postgraduate Education Group, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the cost, nutritional and food variety contents of commercial meals and published infant and young child feeding (IYCF) home-cooked recipes, and to compare nutritional contents to age-specific recommendations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Full range of preprepared main meals available within the UK market. Main-meal recipes identified from a survey of Amazon's top 20 best-sellers and IYCF cookbooks available from local libraries. SAMPLES: 278 commercial IYCF savoury meals from UK market and 408 home-cooked recipes from best-selling IYCF published cookbooks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost and nutritional content per 100 g and food variety per meal for both commercial meals and home-cooked recipes. RESULTS: Commercial products provided more 'vegetable' variety per meal (median=3.0; r=-0.33) than home-cooked recipes (2.0). Home-cooked recipes provided 26% more energy and 44% more protein and total fat than commercial products (r=-0.40, -0.31, -0.40, respectively) while costing less (£0.33/100 g and £0.68/100 g, respectively). The majority of commercial products (65%) met energy density recommendations but 50% of home-cooked recipes exceeded the maximum range. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of commercial meals provided an energy-dense meal with greater vegetable variety per meal to their home-cooked counterparts. Home-cooked recipes provided a cheaper meal option, however the majority exceeded recommendations for energy and fats. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the cost, nutritional and food variety contents of commercial meals and published infant and young child feeding (IYCF) home-cooked recipes, and to compare nutritional contents to age-specific recommendations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Full range of preprepared main meals available within the UK market. Main-meal recipes identified from a survey of Amazon's top 20 best-sellers and IYCF cookbooks available from local libraries. SAMPLES: 278 commercial IYCF savoury meals from UK market and 408 home-cooked recipes from best-selling IYCF published cookbooks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost and nutritional content per 100 g and food variety per meal for both commercial meals and home-cooked recipes. RESULTS: Commercial products provided more 'vegetable' variety per meal (median=3.0; r=-0.33) than home-cooked recipes (2.0). Home-cooked recipes provided 26% more energy and 44% more protein and total fat than commercial products (r=-0.40, -0.31, -0.40, respectively) while costing less (£0.33/100 g and £0.68/100 g, respectively). The majority of commercial products (65%) met energy density recommendations but 50% of home-cooked recipes exceeded the maximum range. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of commercial meals provided an energy-dense meal with greater vegetable variety per meal to their home-cooked counterparts. Home-cooked recipes provided a cheaper meal option, however the majority exceeded recommendations for energy and fats. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Authors: Maria Jose Bernal; Sergio Roman; Michelle Klerks; Juan Francisco Haro-Vicente; Luis Manuel Sanchez-Siles Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-02-27 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Margrethe Røed; Anine C Medin; Frøydis N Vik; Elisabet R Hillesund; Wendy Van Lippevelde; Karen Campbell; Nina C Øverby Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 5.428