Literature DB >> 27435748

Measurement properties of the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L to assess quality of life in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release.

C Marti1,2, S Hensler1, D B Herren3, K Niedermann2, M Marks1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the measurement properties of the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). A total of 60 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome completed the EQ-5D-5L twice before surgical decompression and once more 6 weeks after surgery. In addition, they filled out the Short Form 12 and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire at the baseline and postoperative follow-up examinations. Test-retest reliability was excellent with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.81. Internal consistency was high with Cronbach's alpha of 0.83. Good validity of the EQ-5D-5L was indicated by correlations of r = 0.7 and r = 0.5 with the Short Form 12 and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, respectively. Moderate responsiveness was shown by an effect size of 0.5. The minimal important change was 0.09 points. Overall, the EQ-5D-5L demonstrates sound measurement properties and can be recommended as a suitable tool to assess quality of life in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EQ-5D; Quality of life; carpal tunnel syndrome; reliability; responsiveness; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27435748     DOI: 10.1177/1753193416659404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol        ISSN: 0266-7681


  7 in total

1.  Patient Judgement of Change with Elective Surgery Correlates with Patient Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Meg E Morris; Victoria Atkinson; Jeffrey Woods; Paul S Myles; Anita Hodge; Cathy H Jones; Damien Lloyd; Vincent Rovtar; Amanda M Clifford; Natasha K Brusco
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27

2.  Cost-Effectiveness of Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release.

Authors:  James I Barnes; Gabrielle Paci; Thompson Zhuang; Laurence C Baker; Steven M Asch; Robin N Kamal
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 6.558

3.  Is retrospective assessment of health-related quality of life valid?

Authors:  Andrew Lawson; Aidan C Tan; Justine Naylor; Ian A Harris
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Quality of Life and Clinical Outcome After Traumatic Spleen Injury (SPLENIQ Study): Protocol for an Observational Retrospective and Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Claudia Pam Raaijmakers; Paul Nm Lohle; Paul Lodder; Jolanda de Vries
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2019-04-26

5.  App-based maintenance treatment for alcohol use disorder after acute inpatient treatment: Study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sebastian Saur; Kiona K Weisel; Catharina Lang; Lukas M Fuhrmann; Sabine Steins-Loeber; Niklas Enewoldsen; Daniela Reichl; Mathias Zink; Fabian Jakobi; Melanie Rudolph; Andreas Ahnert; Wolf-Dietrich Braunwarth; Peter Falkai; Gabriele Koller; Nina Behle; Laura Hager; Thomas Hillemacher; Peter Heepe; Felix-Nicolai Müller; Thomas Kraus; Yaroslav Kiderman; Nicola Horn; Johannes Kornhuber; Stephan Lins; Philipp Spitzer; Dominikus Bönsch; Cyril Counot; Mark Stemmler; Anja Hildebrand; Volker Amelung; Linda Kerkemeyer; Matthias Berking
Journal:  Internet Interv       Date:  2022-02-23

6.  Validity, responsiveness and minimal important change of the EQ-5D-5L in patients after rotator cuff repair, shoulder arthroplasty or thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty.

Authors:  Miriam Marks; Cécile Grobet; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Association of psychological distress, quality of life and costs with carpal tunnel syndrome severity: a cross-sectional analysis of the PALMS cohort.

Authors:  Christina Jerosch-Herold; Julie Houghton; Julian Blake; Anum Shaikh; Edward Cf Wilson; Lee Shepstone
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.