Literature DB >> 27435183

Age- and Sex-Related Normative Data for the Foot Function Index in a German-Speaking Cohort.

Wolfgang Schneider1, Stefan Jurenitsch2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing popularity of the Foot Function Index (FFI), normative values are still unavailable for this self-administered score. This study was designed to generate age- and sex-related normative values for the FFI-total and for both subscales FFI-pain and FFI-disability.
METHODS: We used the cross-cultural adapted and validated German version of the FFI to generate a data pool using the results of 625 individuals, including staff and visitors to our hospital and excluding persons scheduled for foot surgery or in after-treatment.
RESULTS: Mean values for FFI-total were calculated: 15.3 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.3-16.9), 14.9 points for FFI-pain (CI, 13.3-16.5), and 15.6 for FFI-disability (CI, 13.8-17.4). Results showed higher values for FFI-total, FFI-pain, and FFI-disability for individuals older than 40 years. In general, normative values showed a tendency for higher values with age. A slightly inconsistent distribution over different age groups with a peak for individuals in their 40s and 50s was observed, especially for FFI-pain. Men had better scores than women. Individuals with previous surgery showed lower scores in their respective score.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data calculated normative values for a German-speaking cohort for FFI-total as well as for both subscales FFI-pain and FFI-disability. Our data quantified the increase of FFI-total, FFI-pain, and FFI-disability normative values with age but also showed a slightly inconsistent distribution of normative values over all age groups. We demonstrated higher normative values for women and slightly higher normative values for individuals with previous foot or ankle surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective comparative study.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment; disability; pain; patient-reported outcome measure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27435183     DOI: 10.1177/1071100716659747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  5 in total

1.  Measurement properties of PROMIS short forms for pain and function in orthopedic foot and ankle surgery patients.

Authors:  Anika Stephan; Jens Mainzer; Danica Kümmel; Franco M Impellizzeri
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Patient Reported Outcome Measures in the Foot and Ankle: Normative Values Do Not Reflect 100% Full Function.

Authors:  Lauren M Matheny; Kevin Gittner; Justin Harding; Thomas O Clanton
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of the Foot Function Index in Patients with Foot Disorders.

Authors:  Alireza Mousavian; Ali Mohammadi; Seyed-Hadi Seyed-Hosseinian; Omid Shahpari; Nafiseh Elahpour; Arezoo Orooji; Mohammad H Ebrahimzadeh; Ali Moradi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-05

4.  Validity and reliability of the Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire Brazilian-Portuguese version.

Authors:  Bruna Reclusa Martinez; Isabela Maschk Staboli; Danilo Harudy Kamonseki; Elly Budiman-Mak; Liu Chiao Yi
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-10-18

5.  Normative data for the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS).

Authors:  Siem A Dingemans; Suzanne C Kleipool; Marjolein A M Mulders; Jasper Winkelhagen; Niels W L Schep; J Carel Goslings; Tim Schepers
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.