Literature DB >> 27434476

Comparison of a microsliced modified chondroperichondrium shield graft and a temporalis fascia graft in primary type I tympanoplasty: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Shambhu Nath Bhattacharya1, Sudipta Pal, Somnath Saha, Prasanta Kumar Gure, Anupam Roy.   

Abstract

We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare outcomes in type I tympanoplasty patients who received an autologous microsliced modified cartilage perichondrium shield graft (cartilage group) and those who received an autologous temporalis muscle fascia graft (fascia group). Our three outcomes measures were (1) anatomic success rates at 3 months, (2) hearing results at 6 months, and (3) rates of morphologic success (i.e., the absence of reperforation, retraction, and graft displacement) at 2 years among those in each group who had an intact graft at 3 months. Of 56 patients who were initially enrolled and who underwent one of these type I tympanoplasty procedures, 51 completed the study-28 in the cartilage group and 23 in the fascia group. The former was made up of 11 males and 17 females, aged 15 to 48 years (mean: 27.4), and the latter included 9 males and 14 females, aged 15 to 52 years (mean: 31.7). The overall graft take rate at 3 months with respect to perforation closure (anatomic success) was 93.3% in the cartilage group and 91.7% in the fascia group, which was not a statistically significant difference. The mean hearing gain at 6 months was 11.7 ± 7.6 dB in the cartilage group and 12.6 ± 6.0 dB in the fascia group-again, not statistically significant. At 2 years, morphologic success rates were 92.3 and 81.0%, respectively-again, not statistically significant. We conclude that autologous microsliced modified cartilage perichondrium shield graft tympanoplasty is as effective as conventional temporalis fascia tympanoplasty in terms of graft take rates and functional results. Indeed, medium-term outcomes (2-yr follow-up) revealed that sustainable morphologic success was actually better with the cartilage technique than with the fascia technique because it was associated with fewer revision surgeries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27434476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J        ISSN: 0145-5613            Impact factor:   1.697


  5 in total

1.  Tympanic membrane perforations: a critical analysis of 1003 ears and proposal of a new classification based on pathogenesis.

Authors:  Fábio André Selaimen; Leticia Petersen Schmidt Rosito; Mauricio Noschang Lopes da Silva; Valentina de Souza Stanham; Neil Sperling; Sady Selaimen da Costa
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Endoscopic Cartilage Butterfly Tympanoplasty: A Two-Handed Technique with Endoscope Holder.

Authors:  Sapna R Parab; Mubarak M Khan; Asiya Zaidi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-05-08

3.  Butterfly Cartilage Tympanoplasty Long-term Results: Excellent Treatment Method in Small and Medium Sized Perforations.

Authors:  Isa Kaya; Murat Benzer; Mustafa Uslu; Cem Bilgen; Tayfun Kirazli
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 3.372

4.  Endoscopic myringoplasty: comparison of double layer cartilage-perichondrium graft and single fascia grafting.

Authors:  Zheng Cai Lou
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-06-22

5.  Type 1 tympanoplasty in patients with large perforations: Comparison of temporalis fascia, partial-thickness cartilage, and full-thickness cartilage.

Authors:  Caixia Xing; Hong Liu; Guodong Li; Jianfeng Li; Xin Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.671

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.