Literature DB >> 27434357

Validation of remote dielectric sensing (ReDS™) technology for quantification of lung fluid status: Comparison to high resolution chest computed tomography in patients with and without acute heart failure.

Offer Amir1, Zaher S Azzam2, Tamar Gaspar3, Suzan Faranesh-Abboud3, Nizar Andria2, Daniel Burkhoff4, Aharon Abbo5, William T Abraham6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary congestion is a common presentation of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). The ability to quantify increased pulmonary parenchymal water content in chest computed tomography (CCT) is well known. However, availability and radiation limitations make it unsuitable for serial assessment of lung fluid content. The ReDS™ technology allows quantification of lung fluid content.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work was to validate the ability of the ReDS™ technology to quantify total lung fluid when compared with CCT in ADHF and non-ADHF patients.
METHODS: Following CCT, ReDS measurements were obtained from consented subjects. ReDS measurements were then compared to the CCT using lung density analysis software. CCT results were converted from Hounsfield Units to percentage units, allowing comparison with the ReDS readings. The analyses, performed on 16 ADHF and 15 non-ADHF patients, were conducted by an independent observer blinded to ReDS outcomes.
RESULTS: The fluid content averages and standard deviations for the non-ADHF group were 28.7±5.9% and 27.3±6.6% and for the ADHF patients 40.7±8.8% and 39.8±6.8% (CCT and ReDS respectively). Intraclass correlation was found to be 0.90, 95% CI [0.8-0.95]. Regression analysis yielded a slope of 0.94 (95% confidence interval [0.77-1.12]) and intercept 3.10 (95% confidence interval of [-3.02-9.21]). The absolute mean difference between the quantification of the two methods was 3.75 [%] with SD of 2.22 [%].
CONCLUSION: Current findings show high correlation between the ReDS noninvasive system and CCT in both ADHF and non-ADHF patients. Remote patient monitoring using ReDS™ based system may help in the management of patients with heart failure.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diuretics; Fluid management; Heart failure; Telemonitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27434357     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  29 in total

1.  Classification of Decompensated Heart Failure From Clinical and Home Ballistocardiography.

Authors:  Varol Burak Aydemir; Supriya Nagesh; Md Mobashir Hasan Shandhi; Joanna Fan; Liviu Klein; Mozziyar Etemadi; James Alex Heller; Omer T Inan; James M Rehg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Assessment of pulmonary congestion is of prime importance.

Authors:  Go Hiasa; Hideki Okayama; Yukio Kazatani
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Cardio-Pulmonary Stethoscope: Clinical Validation With Heart Failure and Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Magdy F Iskander; Todd B Seto; Ruthsenne Rg Perron; Eunjung Lim; Farhan Qazi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Decoupling Between Diastolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure and Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure as a Prognostic Factor After Continuous Flow Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Ben Chung; Ann Nguyen; Daniel Rodgers; Gabriel Sayer; Sirtaz Adatya; Nitasha Sarswat; Gene Kim; Jayant Raikhelkar; Takeyohi Ota; Tae Song; Colleen Juricek; Viktoriya Kagan; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Mandeep Mehra; Daniel Burkhoff; Nir Uriel
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 5.  Congestion in heart failure: a contemporary look at physiology, diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Eva M Boorsma; Jozine M Ter Maaten; Kevin Damman; Wilfried Dinh; Finn Gustafsson; Steven Goldsmith; Daniel Burkhoff; Faiez Zannad; James E Udelson; Adriaan A Voors
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 6.  Wearable technology for cardiology: An update and framework for the future.

Authors:  Joshua M Pevnick; Kade Birkeland; Raymond Zimmer; Yaron Elad; Ilan Kedan
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 6.677

Review 7.  Clinical implications of hemodynamic assessment during left ventricular assist device therapy.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Ben Chung; Ann Nguyen; Gabriel Sayer; Nir Uriel
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Assessment of Thoracic Blood Volume by Computerized Tomography in Patients With Heart Failure and Periodic Breathing.

Authors:  Caitlin C Jorgenson; Steven C Chase; Lyle J Olson; Bruce D Johnson
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 5.712

9.  Lung water assessment: from gravimetry to wearables.

Authors:  Frederic Michard
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Dilemmas in the Dosing of Heart Failure Drugs: Titrating Diuretics in Chronic Heart Failure.

Authors:  David Pham; Justin L Grodin
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.