Literature DB >> 27434138

Genic and Intergenic SSR Database Generation, SNPs Determination and Pathway Annotations, in Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.).

Morad M Mokhtar1, Sami S Adawy1, Salah El-Din S El-Assal2, Ebtissam H A Hussein1,2.   

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out aiming to use the bioinformatics tools in order to identify and characterize, simple sequence repeats within the third Version of the date palm genome and develop a new SSR primers database. In addition single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are located within the SSR flanking regions were recognized. Moreover, the pathways for the sequences assigned by SSR primers, the biological functions and gene interaction were determined. A total of 172,075 SSR motifs was identified on date palm genome sequence with a frequency of 450.97 SSRs per Mb. Out of these, 130,014 SSRs (75.6%) were located within the intergenic regions with a frequency of 499 SSRs per Mb. While, only 42,061 SSRs (24.4%) were located within the genic regions with a frequency of 347.5 SSRs per Mb. A total of 111,403 of SSR primer pairs were designed, that represents 291.9 SSR primers per Mb. Out of the 111,403, only 31,380 SSR primers were in the genic regions, while 80,023 primers were in the intergenic regions. A number of 250,507 SNPs were recognized in 84,172 SSR flanking regions, which represents 75.55% of the total SSR flanking regions. Out of 12,274 genes only 463 genes comprising 896 SSR primers were mapped onto 111 pathways using KEGG data base. The most abundant enzymes were identified in the pathway related to the biosynthesis of antibiotics. We tested 1031 SSR primers using both publicly available date palm genome sequences as templates in the in silico PCR reactions. Concerning in vitro validation, 31 SSR primers among those used in the in silico PCR were synthesized and tested for their ability to detect polymorphism among six Egyptian date palm cultivars. All tested primers have successfully amplified products, but only 18 primers detected polymorphic amplicons among the studied date palm cultivars.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27434138      PMCID: PMC4951042          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L., 2n = 36) [1] is one of the most economic important fruit trees in the Middle East and North Africa. It is a dioecious, cross pollinated, perennial monocotyledon and belongs of the order Arecaceae [2]. It has been cultivated in the Middle East from about 4000 B.C. [3]. There are over 2000 varieties that vary in shape, color, size, and weight [4]. Despite such a large number of varieties, for many years the detection of genetic variation in date palm was relying on the morphological variation between cultivars [5]. Morphological variations are uncertain and unstable because they could be affected by environmental factors, epistasis, pleiotropic effects and other factors. Therefore, as long as breeding programs depended on morphological markers alone, the pace of progress was bound to be slow. During the last few decades molecular markers were employed to detect the genetic polymorphism more accurately, and as useful tools in crop improvement and breeding programs. Among the most widely used molecular markers are amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) [6], simple sequence repeats (SSRs) [7], randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) [8]. Compared with other types of molecular markers, SSRs have many advantages, such as simplicity, effectiveness, abundance, hyper variability, reproducibility, co-dominant inheritance and extensive genomic coverage [9]. In recent years date palm has been subjected to intensive genome sequencing studies. Yang et al. [10] reported the complete chloroplast genome sequence. The mitochondrial genome was assembled by Fang et al. [11] with an approximate length of about 715,001 bp. While, the first nuclear genome sequence of date palm was published by Al-Dous et al. [12]. It covered ~60% of the genome which represent ~380 Mb (25,059 genes) out of the 658Mb estimated genome size. They recognized more than 3.5 million polymorphic sites among the nine investigated varieties of date palm. Also, Al-Mssallem et al. [13] reported the second nuclear genome assembly which is about 605.4 Mb and covers 90% of the date palm genome. Nowadays, the commonly published genome data and the availability of bioinformatics tools provide the scientists with tools to identify simple sequence repeats that could be used to develop useful SSR markers. Hamwieh et al. [7] surveyed the first Version (VS 01) of date palm genome and designed 1091 SSR primers. Zhao et al. [14] also successfully designed 4,967 EST-SSRs primers according to the available date palm expressed sequence tags (ESTs). The present investigation was carried out aiming to: 1) identify and characterize, simple sequence repeats within the third Version (VS 3.0) of the date palm genome; 2) comparatively analyze genic and intergenic SSR motifs and develop a new SSR primers database; 3) recognize all single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are located within the SSR flanking regions and 4) annotate the pathways for the sequences assigned by SSR primers and consequently determine the biological functions and gene interaction

Materials and Methods

Source of genomic sequences and SNPs Data

In this study, we used the Version 3.0 of the date palm draft genome sequence of Khalas female variety published by Al-Dous et al. [12]. It contains 57,277 scaffolds, about 381 Mb in length and covers about 60% of the genome sequence. Also, the 3,518,029 SNPs covering the whole genome were employed. All genome sequences and SNPs data were downloaded from http://qatar-weill.cornell.edu/research/datepalmGenome/download.html.

SSR motifs mining and primer design

The Perl script MISA (MIcroSAtellite identification tool; http://pgrc.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa) and primer3_core [15] were used. These were inserted in the pipeline tool developed by the research team to identify and design SSR primers and to link it to SNPs that are located within the SSR flanking regions. A total of 57,277 scaffolds containing ~381 Mb sequences were used to determine SSR motifs with the following criteria: the repeat number in mononucleotide (mono-) ≥ 10 (bp), in dinucleotide (di-) ≥ 6 bp, in trinucleotide (tri-), tetranucleotide (tetra-), pentanucleotide (penta-), and hexanucleotide (hexa-) ≥ 5 bp. The maximal number of bases interrupting two SSR motifs in a compound microsatellite was 100 bp. SSR primers were designed to satisfy the following criteria: an optimum primer length of 20 bp, the optimum melting temperature of 55°C, the product size range of 100–500 bp, and a 50% optimum G/C content. The presence of SSRs was investigated in the genic and intergenic regions. These regions were determined according to previous classification of the genome sequences by Al-Dous et al. [12].

Validation of the designed SSR primers

Two methods were used to validate our designed SSR primers. The first method was in silico validation by applying the bioinformatics tools to test 1031 SSR primer pairs using the primer search program:EMBOSS:6.5.7.0, among the two date palm genomes published by Al-Dous et al. [12] and Al-Mssallem et al. [13]. The first genome sequence was used to design our SSR primers which were given the name(PDK30 sequence) [12]. While, the second sequence is a whole genome shotgun sequence downloaded from the Genbank with BioProject: PRJNA83433 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and designated as (ATBV01 sequence) [13]. In vitro validation was used as the second method. This was performed through designing and testing 31 SSR primer pairs, randomly selected from the 1031 primers previously tested in silico. In vitro test was applied to investigate the polymorphism among six Egyptian date palm cultivars (Zaghloul, Hayany, Samany, Barhee, Sewi and Bartamoda). Total genomic DNA was extracted from date palm leaves, using the DNeasy Plant Kit (QIAGEN). The PCR amplification reaction was prepared in 25 μl containing 50 ng of DNA, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 5 μl 5X PCR buffer, 0.5 mM each SSR primer, 0.5U of GoTaq Flexi DNA Polymerase, and 2.5 mM dNTPs. The PCR temperature profile was 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 50 s, the annealing temperature for each SSR primer (shown on S1 & S2 Files) for 55 s, 72°C for 50 s, and the final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products were checked and visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel in TBE buffer at 100 W for 120 min.

Enzymes and pathways annotation

The Blast2GO program [16] was used to determine the enzyme codes (EC numbers) or enzyme annotations for 12,274 genes that contain 23,957 SSR primer pairs. The Blast2GO program provides EC annotation through the blast of all sequences against the NCBI database, then determine the gene ontology (GO) annotation. Consequently, the enzyme codes are highlighted on KEGG maps.

Results and Discussion

The present study was based on the date palm genome sequences data published by Al-Dous et al. [12] and Al-Mssallem et al. [13].

Distribution of the different SSR motifs in the date palm genome

Searching for SSRs in the PDK30 sequence [12] revealed that out of the examined 57,277 date palm scaffolds, 28,394 (49.5%) contain SSR repeats satisfying the chosen criteria for detecting SSRs. The number of identified SSR motifs was 172,075, with a frequency of 450.97 SSRs per Mb. The results of identified SSR motifs are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Summary of the identified SSR motifs on the date palm PDK30 genome sequence.

Searching itemResults
Total number of scaffolds examined57277
Total size of examined sequences (bp)381563256
Total number of identified SSRs172075
Number of SSR containing sequences28394
Number of sequences containing more than one SSR17237
Number of SSRs present in compound formation22432
The SSRs motifs were not equally distributed in the genic and intergenic regions. Out of the 172,075 SSR motifs, 130,014 SSRs (75.6%) were located within the intergenic regions with a frequency of 499 SSRs per Mb. While, 42,061 SSRs (24.4%) were located within the genic regions with a frequency of 347.5 SSRs per Mb. Interestingly, Zhang et al. [17] surveyed the full-length of 30,854 genes generated from (assembled ESTs) of date palm, and identified 2,043 SSRs motifs. This number is lower than the number of SSRs identified in the present study. This could be due to the different criteria and the use of the full genome sequence adopted in our investigation. Among the genic regions 1,785 SSRs were located in exons. This represents about 4.24% of the total genic regions (121018751 bp). However, 40,276 SSRs (95.76%) were located within the introns. The details of the identified SSRs in date palm are summarized in the S3 File. Our investigation of the different SSR motifs present in the intergenic region showed that the most abundant type was the mono- (63.6%), followed by the di- (27.8%), tri- (6.2%), tetra-(2%), penta- (0.3%) and hexa- (0.1%). However, in the introns of the genic regions the percentages of mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta- and hexa- repeats were 62.7%, 29.3%, 5.8%, 1.9%, 0.2% and 0.1% respectively. While in the exons, the most frequent type was the tri-, followed by the mono-, di-, hexa- and tetra- repeats (86.2%, 7.6%, 5.3%, 0.6% and 0.3%, respectively). The penta- repeat was not found in the exon regions (. Similarly, Zhao et al. [14] reported that the trinucleotide repeats were the most abundant in the exon regions. In general, the distribution of SSR motifs in the genic regions was consistent with Zhang et al. [17]. However, all the previous studies on date palm did not mention the presence of mononucleotide repeats [7,14,17]. To our knowledge this is the first investigation that shed light on the presence of the mononucleotide repeats in date palm. The total population of the detected SSRs across the genome was classified as non-triplet repeats (mono, di, tetra and penta) and triplet repeats (tri and hexa). The results are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. As shown in Table 2, the frequency of the different non-triplet types with different repeat number was variable in the genic and intergenic regions. In general, there was a negative correlation between the number of repeats and the number of detected nontriplet motifs. Concerning the penta repeats, although the number was considerably lower in the genic than intergenic regions, however, they were confined to the 5–9 number of repeats.
Table 2

Comparison between non-triplet repeat types according to the number of repeats in both genic and intergenic regions.

Non-triplet
 Mono-Di-Tetra-Penta-
No. of RepeatGenicIntergenicGenicIntergenicGenicIntergenicGenicIntergenic
5–9--856322859726223475315
10–15229446836524085941215-1
16–2018106247647158413--
21–25433138718646025-1
26–301064333797-3--
31–35431521031-2--
36–45481555301-1-
46–551641911-4--
56–70624518-3-1
71–100-9123323--
101–15012214413--
151–200-11026----
201–350111613----
Total25408768171192931147735227576318
Table 3

Comparison between triplet repeat types according to the number of repeat in both genic and intergenic regions.

Triplet
 Tri-Hexa-
No. of RepeatGenicIntergenicGenicIntergenic
5–93745725949115
10–1575152-1
16–201221--
21–25410-1
26–30-4--
31–35-2--
36–451---
46–5523--
56–70351-
71–1004811
101–250166--
Total3862747051118
As shown in Table 3, the number of trinucleotide repeats decreased when the number of repeats increased from 5 to 35 repeats (from 3745 to 0 in the genic region and 7259 to 2 in the intergenic region). Afterwards these numbers started to increase but with very low frequency. While, the number of hexanucleotide repeats was considerably lower than all the other repeat types and they were confined to the 5 to 9 repeat number. The high appearance of tri repeats in coding regions was consistent with previous studies in plant genomes [18-24]. illustrates the mono, di and tri repeat sequences, number, and locations of the repeats whether in the genic or intergenic regions using the Circos software developed by Krzywinski et al. [25].

The comparison between mono, di and tri- repeats in both genic and intergenic regions.

The numbers in boxes (1, 2, and 3) and (4, 5 and 6) represent the repeat types in the genic and intergenic regions, respectively. Similar repeats in the genic and intergenic regions are labeled with the same color. Numbers with pink color represent the number of repeats in the genic regions, while those with blue color refer to the intergenic regions. The latter data are illustrated with the same colors as histograms. Concerning the other types of SSR repeats, 134 SSRs (tetra, penta and hexa) repeats were present in both genic and intergenic regions ( While, 48 repeats were discovered in the genic regions only and comprised 11 tetra, 9 penta and 28 hexa repeats. In addition, 236 repeats were unique to the intergenic regions. The latter comprised 63 tetra, 84 penta and 88 hexa repeats. The present study represents the first report concerning the comparison of these specific SSR motifs (mono, di, tri, tetra, penta and hexa) in both genic and intergenic regions in the date palm genome.

Comparison between tetra, penta and hexa- repeats in both genic and intergenic regions.

The outer most circle in blue colored letters represents the different types of repeats in the intergenic regions. While, the pink colored numbers refer to the number of their respective repeats. The middle circle in red colored letters illustrates the types of repeats present in both genic and intergenic regions. While, the number of each repeat was yellow colored for the genic and black colored for the intergenic regions. The inner most circle with green colored letters shows the repeats unique to the genic regions, and the dark red colored numbers reveal the respective number of repeats. The orange, blue and green rectangles refer to tetra, penta and hexa repeats, respectively. Among the tri repeats, 60 different repeat sequences were determined Fig 2. The tri repeats are of special importance, since some of these repeats could represent coding sequences for amino acids, start or stop codons. This has also been suggested by Pinto et al. [26] and Kaur et al. [27]. They explained that trinucleotide repeats, can be accommodated more readily within coding regions, as changes in their length simply result in gain or loss of a single amino acid from a protein sequence.
Fig 2

The comparison between mono, di and tri- repeats in both genic and intergenic regions.

The numbers in boxes (1, 2, and 3) and (4, 5 and 6) represent the repeat types in the genic and intergenic regions, respectively. Similar repeats in the genic and intergenic regions are labeled with the same color. Numbers with pink color represent the number of repeats in the genic regions, while those with blue color refer to the intergenic regions. The latter data are illustrated with the same colors as histograms.

In this context, Morgante et al. [20], Li et al. [28]and Kalia et al. [29] reported that in many species, triplet SSRs are the most abundant repeats in the exons. They claimed that this could be due to the suppression of non–trimeric SSRs in coding regions which could be the result of change in reading frame with increase or decrease in number of repeat units and the negative selection against frame shift mutations in coding regions. In the present study, the most frequent tri-repeat was AAG as its frequency was 261 in the coding regions. This finding is in good accordance with Li et al. [28].They mentioned that in plants, the most frequent triplet is AAG. However, [30-32]found that in cereals, the most common triplet is CCG. Moreover, [29,33]mentioned that dicots have more mononucleotide repeats and monocots have more trinucleotide repeats. In non-coding regions the rate of base substitution is high [29], however it could also occur in coding regions. Therefore, we surveyed all tri repeat types in the exons to detect probable substitutions that could convert an amino acid to a stop codon. Seventeen repeat sequences were detected Table 4.
Table 4

Different base substitution probabilities that may convert tri repeats in date palm exons to stop codons.

Amino acidRepeat SequenceStop CodonAmino acidRepeat SequenceStop Codon
ArginineCGATGACysteineTGTTGA
AGATGATGCTGA
GlycineGGATGATryptophanTGGTGA
GAGTAGGlutamineCAGTAG
LeucineTTATGACAATAA
TTGTAGLysineAAATAA
SerineTCATGAAAGTAG
TCGTAGTyrosineTACTAA
Glutamic acidGAATAATATTAA

SSR primers Design

A total of 111,403 SSR primer pairs were designed, that represents 291.9 SSR primers per Mb and covers the amplification of 22,652,015 bp (5.9%) of the total genome. Out of the 111,403, only 31,380 SSR primers were developed in the genic regions. These primers could amplify about 7,727,736 bp (6.38%) of the total genic regions. However, 80,023 primers covered the amplification of about 14924279 bp (5.72%) of the total intergenic regions (

Comparison between primers product length within genic and intergenic region on date palm genome.

The first column (left) represents the total genome length and total length of primers product, and the other two columns represent total length of primers product comparing to the total length of genic and intergenic regions. Using the Version 1.0 date palm genome, Hamwieh et al. [7] designed only 1091 SSR primers. However, in the present study, we used Version 3.0 of date palm genome and succeeded to design 111,403 SSR primers in both genic and intergenic regions. To distinguish between our SSRs and other SSR primers developed on date palm genome, such as those previous developed [14,34,35], we named the Genic and intergenic SSR primers as Pd_G_SSRx and Pd_IG_SSRx, respectively (where Pd_G_SSR refers to Phoenix dactylifera Genic SSR primers, and Pd_IG_SSR was refers to Phoenix dactylifera Intergenic SSR primers and x refers to serial number).

Determination and Distribution of SNPs located within SSRs flanking regions

SNPs data were downloaded from http://qatarweill.cornell.edu/research/datepalmGenome/download.html, and were subjected to Perl script developed by our research team to recognize all SNPs located in the SSR flanking regions. A total of 250,507 SNPs were determined in 84,172 SSR regions which represent 75.55% of the total SSR flanking regions. Therefore, the frequency of SNPs per SSR flanking region was 2.97. The distribution of these SNPs among the genome revealed that a number of 186,953 SNPs was located in 60,764 intergenic SSR flanking regions, while 63,554 SNPs were located in 23,408 genic SSR flanking regions ( Thus, the high range of variation among the date palm genotypes could be attributed to the high record of SNPs in the genic regions.

Development of date palm SSR primers database

The newly designed SSR primer pairs and related SNPs within the genic and intergenic regions were listed in the (S1 and S2 Files, respectively representing the two different databases). Each database contains information concerning the name of primers, repeats type, repeats sequence, repeats size, repeats start and end in the amplified sequences, forward and reverse primer sequences, primers annealing temperature, GC%, product size, corresponding genomic sequences, contig ID within date palm genome, gene product, gene ID (start and end on genome) and position of SNPs within SSRs flanking region. In addition, the gene product and SNPs location as designated by Al-Dous et al. [12] have been also incorporated in the developed database.

Detection of SSRs in disease resistance related genes

The developed genic database was exploited to recognize the designed SSR primer pairs within the disease resistance related genes. A total of 42 SSR primer pairs were located within 16 different genes related to disease resistance. These results are summarized in Table 5.
Table 5

SSR primers designed within disease resistance related genes.

Gene product 1contig ID 2Gene Start 3Gene End 3Primer name 4
Brown planthopper-induced resistance protein 1PDK_30s10537511204118193Pd_GSSR1733
PDK_30s116010166567974Pd_GSSR4967
CC-NBS-LRR resistance proteinPDK_30s77957113289575Pd_GSSR14611
PDK_30s107857127827044Pd_GSSR24273
PDK_30s7906417834086Pd_GSSR28574
PDK_30s1108901711610724Pd_GSSR3477
PDK_30s113095149009698Pd_GSSR4096
PDK_30s11593811841223365Pd_GSSR4958, Pd_GSSR4959
Disease resistance protein rps2PDK_30s6760211155115125Pd_GSSR8887
Enhanced disease resistance 1PDK_30s10650915219762496Pd_GSSR2000, Pd_GSSR2002
Mlo family proteinPDK_30s99845151510639Pd_GSSR31369
Mlo-like protein 14PDK_30s6655213324835690Pd_GSSR26227, Pd_GSSR26229
Natural resistance-associated macrophage proteinPDK_30s8530317867042Pd_GSSR17867, Pd_GSSR17868
NBS-LRR type resistance proteinPDK_30s74270117136858Pd_GSSR12867
PDK_30s66528187243102914Pd_GSSR8157, Pd_GSSR8161, Pd_GSSR26210,Pd_GSSR26212, Pd_GSSR26213
Non-race specific disease resistance 1PDK_30s9095214797523Pd_GSSR20333, Pd_GSSR20334
Protein kinase xa21PDK_30s866171212911697Pd_GSSR18479, Pd_GSSR18481, Pd_GSSR29704
PDK_30s981471973021118Pd_GSSR22786,Pd_GSSR22787, Pd_GSSR22790, Pd_GSSR22791
Rin13 (rpm1 interacting protein 13)PDK_30s103666112435906Pd_GSSR1055, Pd_GSSR1058, Pd_GSSR1061
Rpm1-interacting protein 4PDK_30s86679131827027Pd_GSSR29709
Rust resistance kinase lr10PDK_30s767921186922194251Pd_GSSR14032, Pd_GSSR14033, Pd_GSSR14034
Seven transmembrane protein mlo8 (mlo8)PDK_30s82729126006751Pd_GSSR16802
TIR-NBS resistance proteinPDK_30s10760915738460783Pd_GSSR2418
TIR-NBS-LRR type disease resistance proteinPDK_30s7162411127614302Pd_GSSR27256

disease resistance genes product,

contig ID in date palm genome,

gene start and end in date palm genome,

primer name in our data base.

disease resistance genes product, contig ID in date palm genome, gene start and end in date palm genome, primer name in our data base.

Validation of the designed primers

To validate our designed SSR primers, the first test was in silico PCR. We tested 1031 SSR primers using the primersearch program: EMBOSS: 6.5.7.0. Both publicly available date palm genome PDK Version 3.0 (PDK30) sequence [12] and ATBV01 sequence [13]were used as templates in the in silico PCR reactions. When using the date palm genome PDK30 sequence[12], all the 1031 SSR primer pairs successfully found 2450 complementary sequences with an average number of 2.37 alleles. However, only 903 SSR primers could successfully hit with 2774 complementary sequences in ATBV01 sequence [13] with an average number of 2.69 alleles. These results are summarized in (Table 6 and S4 File).
Table 6

Summary statistics of the in silico validated detected SSR in date palm genome sequences.

ItemsPDK30 sequence1ATBV01 sequence2
No. of tested primers10311031
No. of primers found hits in genome sequence1031903
No. of hit sequences in genome24502774
Total length of hit sequences in genome(bp)613364696699

1PDK30 sequence (Al-Dous et al [12])

2ATBV01 sequence (Al-Mssallem et al [13])

1PDK30 sequence (Al-Dous et al [12]) 2ATBV01 sequence (Al-Mssallem et al [13]) Concerning the in vitro validation, 31 SSR primers among those used in the in silico PCR were synthesized and tested for their ability to detect polymorphism among six Egyptian date palm cultivars. All tested primers have successfully amplified products, but only 18 primers detected polymorphic amplicons among the studied date palm cultivars ( The comparisons between the results of the in silico and in vitro PCR are summarized in Table 7. The results from both in silico and in vitro PCR were consistent in the number and length of alleles for some primers, while other primers recorded polymorphism in fragments sequence and differences in some alleles length. Moreover, some alleles could be detected in one genome and absent in other genome sequence. As shown in Table 7, out of the 104 alleles detected in vitro only 23 were consistent in both in silico and in vitro PCR.
Table 7

The comparison between the summarized results of the in silico and in vitro PCR.

In vitro PCRIn silico PCR
ZaghloulHayanySamanyBarheeSewiBartamodaKhalas (PDK30) ªKhalas (ATPV01)
Primer nameForward & Reverse primer sequenceNo. of allelesAllele length (bp)Allele length (bp)Allele length (bp)Allele length (bp)Allele length (bp)Allele length (bp)No. of alleleAllele length (bp)Allele length (bp)
Pd_GSSR14034CGCACTCTGGAATCAACTCACATCTGCCGACAGAGTCAAA1143 ª143ª143ª143ª143ª143ª2143ª142
Pd_GSSR18389AGGCAGAGAGATGTCCGTGTAAAAGTCTCCATGTCCGTGC1301ª301ª301ª301ª301ª301ª1301ª301
Pd_GSSR18525CATGCCTGCTATGATCGGTACAGGAAGATCCCAAATCGAA2200200/222200/222200200/222200/2222191244
Pd_GSSR18997GCCTGATGATAGTCTCGGCTGCGAACCATACGAAAGCAGT2173ª150173ªND173ª1502160/173ª160/173
Pd_GSSR19717CCATTTCGATGTCACCTCCTGCGAACCATACGAAAGCAGT1229ª229ª229ª229ª229ª229ª1229ª229
Pd_GSSR19798AGTCGTGGAGAGATTGCGTTGCCCATCTTGTAGGGAGACA3328/354328328328/3543153282333274
Pd_GSSR19852CGGAAGATGCTGAAGTCTCCGCCATAGGAGTTTCAGTCGG2220ª/434220ª220ª/434220ª220ª220ª/4341220 ª220
Pd_GSSR2002TTTGGGATGTTGAATGGGTTTCTTTGGTGGAAAAAGCCAG1340ª340ª340ª340ª340ª340ª2340ª/413340/413
Pd_GSSR20333AAGTTCATGGGATGGTCGAGGGCTTCAACAATATGCGACA8231/562/674239/674247/562/674239/562247/562/674243/6742225/227227
Pd_GSSR21118AGGTGGAGGCCTTCATAGGTTGAATTTGTGCTAGCGATGC1257ª257ª257ª257ª257ª257ª1257ª257
Pd_GSSR22331TACGTGGTCTTGCACGGTAATTAAGCTCGCACTCCTCGAT2213ª/238213ª/238213ª213ª213ª213ª/2381213ª213
Pd_GSSR2418ACTCCCATGTAAACCTCCCCATGTGGGTTGGGTTTGTTGT1237ª237ª237ª237ª237ª237ª3237ª236/613
Pd_GSSR3388TTCCAATGAAAGCCTTTTGGACCCGGAACAGGTTACTGAG41651651711711781782155152
Pd_GSSR3981TTCCTCCTGTTTTTCCCCTTCTCACCGGCTCTACCAGAAG1278ª278ª278ª278ª278ª278ª2278 ª277
Pd_GSSR4096CGCAATCATTAAGCTCAGTCAGTTGGGAATGGGTAAGGTCAA13153153153153153152329328
Pd_GSSR4657TTGATGAGCCTCCTCTTTGGGATGGTGAGAGTTGGGGAGA3333ª/740333ª/740333ª/740333ª/337/740333ª/740333ª/7401333ª333
Pd_GSSR4967TGGCCATCGAGTGCTACATAAGGCTTCGTTCCTCCAACTT2200/586200/586200/586200/586200/586200/5861189189
Pd_GSSR6184CCCCAGAAAATGCCTTAACAAAGAGCGTTGACTGCTACCAA1125ª125ª125ª125ª125ª125ª1125ª125
Pd_GSSR7241GATGCCAAGCACTGTGATGTTATCCTGCATGCACCAATGT1348ª348ª348ª348ª348ª348ª3229/348ª229/348/397
Pd_GSSR8157CAGCTCTCGGGAAATCTTTGTGCCACTGTTTTTGGATCAG2165ª165ª/186ª165ª165ª165ª165ª/186ª2165ª/186ª165/186
Pd_IG_SSR_123TTGCTAGAACCCTAACCCCCCCCAACCCGTTTAAGGAAAT7497/539488/5335054844844745284/388/420/714/769ND
Pd_IG_SSR_18GAAACGGGCCCCTAGAATTATCACTGTCTCCACCACCATC14198/282/329198/282188/352179/264/307171/220/252/331163/2483287214/291
Pd_IG_SSR_211TGGATGTTTCTGGTTACTGTTGTTAGGAACCCCCTTATCCCA4256ª278256ª278/253256ª2672356ª253
Pd_IG_SSR_289GGCACTCCATGACCTTTTGTAAACAAGCCGAAACCAACAG2225225240ª/225225225229/240ª3152/240 ª152/225
Pd_IG_SSR_343TGCAACAAAGAGATCTGCCAAGACAAAGGCTTCCCCAAAT6304ª282/304ª304ª274/316295282/3123195/231/304ª195/231
Pd_IG_SSR_38CGCGGTCACTGAAGTCAATAGGAAACCCATGGGAACATAA6224/295224/300290250/3092903091326ND
Pd_IG_SSR_500GCGGCATCCTCTTGAACTTATTTCCAATCCAACCTAGCAGTT7266266/319261254/280/314254254/319/3432271/333271
Pd_IG_SSR_539TGGTTCAGGAGAAGCATGTGGAAGAAATTGGGAGAATTAGGG2278/343278/343278/343278/343278/343278/3432258/357258
Pd_IG_SSR_619CTGCATGACTTGGCACCTTAAAGGCCTTAGCCCAAAGAAG6210/240ª/270210/265210/236/260210/240ª/265210/240ª/270210/2651240ªND
Pd_IG_SSR_65CCTCTTATCCTTCTCTTCGGGAACTTTCTTCTGCATTGCCA2354/428354/428354/428354/428354/428354/4281488ND
Pd_IG_SSR_660TAGATCCTCCCCTTTACCCGGTATACACACACACGCACGC8150ª/168150ª157/180159168/198168/1902150ª150/298

a The bands consistent with Khalas (PDK30 sequence) [12]

b The bands consistent with Khalas (ATPV01 sequence) [13], ND non detected.

a The bands consistent with Khalas (PDK30 sequence) [12] b The bands consistent with Khalas (ATPV01 sequence) [13], ND non detected.

Functional classification by KEGG pathway analyses

The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway database is a useful tool for understanding genes biological functions and their molecular interactions[36]. We used the Blast2GO program [16] to determine the Enzyme (EC numbers) or Enzyme annotations for 12,274 genes that contain 23,957 SSR primers. The Blast2GO program provides EC annotation through the blast of all sequences against the NCBI database, then determine the gene ontology (GO) annotation, consequently, the enzyme codes are highlighted on KEGG maps. Based on the basic parameters of the Blast2GO program, the blast results revealed that 3787 sequences were partial genes, thus, this number was excluded from the next steps of analysis. The remaining 8487 sequences showed blast result path to gene ontology (GO) annotation step. This step indicated 3201 sequences with no GO terms, while, 5286 sequences were assigned to 13554 GO terms, ranging from 1 to 45 GO terms per sequence. Sequences with GO terms were introduced into the EC number detect step. This analysis revealed only 463 unique sequences (genes), which encode an actual number of 258 enzymes distributed among 111 different pathways. These genes comprised 896 SSR primers because each gene sequence might contain more than one SSR primer. The sequences with blast results, GO terms and EC numbers were listed in S5 File and the position of these genes within the genome and the SSR primers name for each gene were listed in S6 File. The data for the pathways name, name of each enzyme and the position of their coding genes within the genome, in addition to the EC numbers for each enzyme were listed in S7 File.The most abundant enzymes were identified in the pathways related to: (1) the biosynthesis of antibiotics (63 enzymes encoded by 83 genes); (2) starch and sucrose metabolism (23 enzymes encoded by 57 genes); (3) glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis (18 enzymes encoded by 32 genes) and (4) amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism (16 enzymes encoded by 18 genes). While, only one enzyme encoded by one gene was identified in the pathway related to insect hormone biosynthesis. The detected pathways, the number of enzymes and number of genes encoding the enzymes represented as histograms, are illustrated in (

Pathways assigned using the designed SSR primers.

The middle part of the figure shows the pathways name. The outer part of the figure reveals the histogram, number of enzymes and number of genes encoding the enzymes in each pathway (where the purple color refers to the number of enzymes in the pathway and the blue color refers to the number of genes encoding the enzyme). To confirm the pathway annotation results, two pathways, i.e., the starch and sucrose metabolism and the amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism pathways were selected to apply the Blast2GO program. This program highlighted the identified Enzyme codes on the respective KEGG map as shown in Figs respectively.

The annotation of the 23 enzymes assigned using our SSR primers in the starch and sucrose metabolism pathway as revealed by the Blast2GO program.

Each enzyme code is highlighted with different color.

The annotation of the 16 enzymes assigned using our SSR primers in the amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism pathway as revealed by the Blast2GO program.

Each enzyme code is highlighted with different color.

Conclusion

This study extends the basic research on date palm in an attempt to promote applying genomics and bioinformatics to enhance breeding and improvement programs of this important crop. The comparative studies depending on SSR motifs are useful since they represent co-dominant markers, highly polymorphic regions and could be used in genetic diversity analysis and breeding programs through designing specific primers for these regions. Genic SSR primers are helpful to detect the polymorphism within functional regions. Therefore, the breeder can choose the appropriate primers according to their localization in the biological pathways related to the trait of interest. Moreover, SNPs in the SSR flanking regions could provide an additional advantage to the breeders. Furthermore, this investigation highlights the usefulness of the in silico PCR for testing the primers before their use in vitro, thus saving time, effort and cost.

The newly designed SSR primer pairs and related SNPs within the genic regions.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

The newly designed SSR primer pairs and related SNPs within the intergenic regions.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

The details of the identified SSRs in date palm genome.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

The summarized results from the in silico PCR reactions.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

List of the sequences with blast results, GO terms and EC numbers.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

The position of the genes that encoded to enzymes within the genome and the SSR primers name for each gene.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

The list of the data for the pathways name, name of each enzyme and the position of their coding genes within the genome, in addition to the EC numbers for each enzyme.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  25 in total

1.  KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.

Authors:  M Kanehisa; S Goto
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  In silico analysis on frequency and distribution of microsatellites in ESTs of some cereal species.

Authors:  Rajeev K Varshney; Thomas Thiel; Nils Stein; Peter Langridge; Andreas Graner
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol Lett       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.787

3.  Distribution of microsatellites in the genome of Medicago truncatula: a resource of genetic markers that integrate genetic and physical maps.

Authors:  Jeong-Hwan Mun; Dong-Jin Kim; Hong-Kyu Choi; John Gish; Frédéric Debellé; Joanne Mudge; Roxanne Denny; Gabriella Endré; Oliver Saurat; Anne-Marie Dudez; Gyorgy B Kiss; Bruce Roe; Nevin D Young; Douglas R Cook
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-02-19       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics.

Authors:  Martin Krzywinski; Jacqueline Schein; Inanç Birol; Joseph Connors; Randy Gascoyne; Doug Horsman; Steven J Jones; Marco A Marra
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Large-scale collection and annotation of gene models for date palm (Phoenix dactylifera, L.).

Authors:  Guangyu Zhang; Linlin Pan; Yuxin Yin; Wanfei Liu; Dawei Huang; Tongwu Zhang; Lei Wang; Chengqi Xin; Qiang Lin; Gaoyuan Sun; Mohammed M Ba Abdullah; Xiaowei Zhang; Songnian Hu; Ibrahim S Al-Mssallem; Jun Yu
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.076

6.  Survey in the sugarcane expressed sequence tag database (SUCEST) for simple sequence repeats.

Authors:  Luciana Rossini Pinto; Karine Miranda Oliveira; Eugênio César Ulian; Antonio Augusto Franco Garcia; Anete Pereira de Souza
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.166

7.  The complete chloroplast genome sequence of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.).

Authors:  Meng Yang; Xiaowei Zhang; Guiming Liu; Yuxin Yin; Kaifu Chen; Quanzheng Yun; Duojun Zhao; Ibrahim S Al-Mssallem; Jun Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Beginnings of fruit growing in the old world.

Authors:  D Zohary; P Spiegel-Roy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Characterization of the sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) global transcriptome using Illumina paired-end sequencing and development of EST-SSR markers.

Authors:  Wenliang Wei; Xiaoqiong Qi; Linhai Wang; Yanxin Zhang; Wei Hua; Donghua Li; Haixia Lv; Xiurong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Genome sequence of the date palm Phoenix dactylifera L.

Authors:  Ibrahim S Al-Mssallem; Songnian Hu; Xiaowei Zhang; Qiang Lin; Wanfei Liu; Jun Tan; Xiaoguang Yu; Jiucheng Liu; Linlin Pan; Tongwu Zhang; Yuxin Yin; Chengqi Xin; Hao Wu; Guangyu Zhang; Mohammed M Ba Abdullah; Dawei Huang; Yongjun Fang; Yasser O Alnakhli; Shangang Jia; An Yin; Eman M Alhuzimi; Burair A Alsaihati; Saad A Al-Owayyed; Duojun Zhao; Sun Zhang; Noha A Al-Otaibi; Gaoyuan Sun; Majed A Majrashi; Fusen Li; Jixiang Wang; Quanzheng Yun; Nafla A Alnassar; Lei Wang; Meng Yang; Rasha F Al-Jelaify; Kan Liu; Shenghan Gao; Kaifu Chen; Samiyah R Alkhaldi; Guiming Liu; Meng Zhang; Haiyan Guo; Jun Yu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  6 in total

1.  Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Doum Palm (Hyphaene compressa) Using Genotyping by Sequencing.

Authors:  Agnes Omire; Johnstone Neondo; Nancy L M Budambula; Laura Wangai; Stephen Ogada; Cecilia Mweu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 2.  CRISPR/Cas9: A Practical Approach in Date Palm Genome Editing.

Authors:  Muhammad N Sattar; Zafar Iqbal; Muhammad N Tahir; Muhammad S Shahid; Muhammad Khurshid; Abdullatif A Al-Khateeb; Suliman A Al-Khateeb
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  PlantPathMarks (PPMdb): an interactive hub for pathways-based markers in plant genomes.

Authors:  Morad M Mokhtar; Achraf El Allali; Mohamed-Elamir F Hegazy; Mohamed A M Atia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Common and novel metabolic pathways related ESTs were upregulated in three date palm cultivars to ameliorate drought stress.

Authors:  Mohammed Refdan Alhajhoj; Muhammad Munir; Balakrishnan Sudhakar; Hassan Muzzamil Ali-Dinar; Zafar Iqbal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  Recent advances in date palm genomics: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Hifzur Rahman; Prashant Vikram; Zied Hammami; Rakesh Kumar Singh
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  SSRome: an integrated database and pipelines for exploring microsatellites in all organisms.

Authors:  Morad M Mokhtar; Mohamed A M Atia
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.